Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Allman KC, Thomson LEJ (2001) Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Europ Heart J 3: F5–F7
Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Boersma E, Rahimtoola SH (2001) Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicitve Accuracies of Various Noninvasive Techniques for Detecting Hibernating Myocardium. Curr Probl Cardiol 26: 144–173
Bax JJ, Maddahi J, Poldermans D et al. (2003) Preoperative comparison of different noninvasive strategies for predicting improvement in left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 92: 1–4
Beller GA (1997) Selecting patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy for medical treatment, revascularization, or heart transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol 4: S152–S157
Beller GA (2001) The role of myocardial perfusion imaging in patient assessment after acute myocardial infarction. Europ Heart J 3: F8–F10
Bergmann SR, Herrero P, Markham J, Weinheimer CJ, Walsh MN (1989) Noninvasive quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with oxygen-15-labeled water and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 14: 639–652
Camici P, Ferrannini E, Opie LH (1989) Myocardial metabolism in ischemic heart disease: basic principles and application to imaging by positron emission tomography. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 32: 217–238
Cannon RO 3rd, Watson RM, Rosing DR, Epstein SE (1983) Angina caused by reduced vasodilator reserve of the small coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 1359–1373
Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA et al. (1989) Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. Circulation 79: 825–835
DePuey EG, Nichols K, Dobrinsky C (1993) Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed from gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Med 34: 1871–1876
Graf S, Khorsand A, Gwechenberger M et al. (2006) Myocardial perfusion in patients with typical chest pain and normal angiogram. Eur J Clin Invest 36: 326–332
Machecourt J, Vanzetto G (2001) Myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with known or suspected disease. Europ Heart J 3: F2–F4
Schwaiger M, Muzik O (1991) Assessment of myocardial perfusion by positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol 67: 35D–43D
Srinivasan G, Kitsiou AN, Bacharach SL, Bartlett ML, Miller-Davis C, Dilsizian V (1998) [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose single photon emission computed tomography: can it replace PET and thallium SPECT for the assessment of myocardial viability? Circulation 97: 843–850
Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, Beller GA, Latour Y, Reeves F (1997) Comparative diagnostic accuracy of TI-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 29: 69–77
Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M et al. (2004) Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31: 261–291
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Literatur. In: Pokan, R., et al. Kompendium der kardiologischen Prävention und Rehabilitation. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69390-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69390-2_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-29134-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-69390-2
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)