Skip to main content

Reappraisal of Concepts Underlying Reinforced-Concrete Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Compressive Force-Path Method

Part of the book series: Engineering Materials ((ENG.MAT.))

  • 1504 Accesses

Abstract

Since the mid-eighties, there has been an increasing amount of experimental evidence which shows that many of the concepts underlying current-code provisions for the design of reinforced-concrete (RC) structures are in conflict with fundamental properties of concrete at both the material and the structure levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kotsovos MD, Pavlovic MN (1999) Ultimate limit-state design of concrete structures: a new approach. Thomas Telford (London), p 164

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Concrete Institute (2002) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-02) and commentary (ACI 318R-02)

    Google Scholar 

  3. EN 1992-1, Eurocode 2 (2004) Design of concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings

    Google Scholar 

  4. EN 1998-1, Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kotsovos MD, Pavlovic MN (2001) The 7/9/99 Athens earthquake: causes of damage not predicted by structural-concrete design methods. J Struct Eng 79(15):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotsovos MD, Baka A, Vougioukas E (2003) Earthquake-resistant design of reinforced-concrete structures: shortcomings of current methods. ACI Struct J 100(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kotsovos GM, Zeris C, Pavlovic MN (2005) Improving RC seismic design through the CFP method. In: Proceedings of ICE, buildings and structures, vol 158(SB5), pp 291–302

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kotsovos GM, Zeris C, Pavlovic MN (2007) Earthquake-resistant design of indeterminate reinforced-concrete slender column elements. Eng Struct 29(2):163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jelic I, Pavlovic MN, Kotsovos MD (2004) Performance of structural-concrete members under sequential loading and exhibiting points of inflection. Comput Concr 1(1):99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter W (1899) Die Bauweise Hennebique. Schweisserische Bauzeitung, vol 33, pp 59–61

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morsch E (1902) Versuche uber Schubspannungen in Betoneisentragen. Beton und Eisen, Berlin, vol 2(4), pp 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barnard PR (1964) Researches into the complete stress-strain curve for concrete. Mag Concr Res 16(49):203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fenwick RC, Paulay T (1968) Mechanisms of shear resistance of concrete beams. J Struct Div. ASCE proceedings, vol 94(ST10), pp 2325–2350

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor HPJ (1974) The fundamental behaviour of reinforced concrete beams in bending and shear. Shear in reinforced concrete, ACI publication SP-42, American concrete institute, pp 43–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor HPJ (1969) Investigation of the dowel shear forces carried by tensile steel in reinforced concrete beams. Technical report 431 (publication 42.431), cement and concrete association, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collins MP, Mitchell D (1980) Shear and torsion design of prestressed and non-prestressed concrete beams. Prestressed Concr Inst 25(5):32–100

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schlaich J, Schafer K, Jennewein M (1987) Toward a consistent design of structural concrete. Prestressed Concr Inst 32(3):74–150

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kotsovos MD (1979) Fracture of concrete under generalised stress. Mater Struct RILEM 12(72):151–158

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kotsovos MD, Newman JB (1981) Fracture mechanics and concrete behaviour. Mag Concr Res 33(115):103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotsovos MD, Pavlovic MN (1995) Structural concrete: finite-element analysis for limit-state design. Thomas Telford, London, p 550

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotsovos MD (1987) Shear failure of reinforced concrete beams. Eng Struct 9(1):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotsovos MD (1987) Shear failure of RC beams: a reappraisal of current concepts. CEB Bull 178/179:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jelic I, Pavlovic MN, Kotsovos MD (1999) A study of dowel action in reinforced concrete beams. Mag Concr Res 51(2):131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhardt HW, Walraven JC (1982) Cracks in concrete subject to shear. J Struct Div, proceedings of the ASCE 108(ST1):207–224

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kotsovos MD (1984) Behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with a shear span to depth ratio between 1.0 and 2.5. ACI J. Proceedings 81(3):279–286. May–June 1984

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kotsovos MD (1986) Behaviour of RC beams with shear span to depth ratios greater than 2.5. ACI J. Proceedings 83(115):1026–1034. Nov–Dec 1986

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kotsovos MD, Bobrowski J, Eibl J (1987) Behaviour of RC T-beams in shear. Struct Eng 65B(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kotsovos G (2005) Improving RC seismic design through the CFP method. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, structures and buildings, vol 158(SB5), pp 291–302. Oct 2005

    Google Scholar 

  29. van Mier JGM, Shah SP, Arnaud M, Balayssac JP, Bascoul A, Choi S, Dasenbrock D, Ferrara G, French C, Gobbi ME, Karihaloo BL, Konig G, Kotsovos MD, Labuz J, Lange-Kornbak D, Markeset G, Pavlovic MN, Simsch G, Thienel K-C, Turatsinze A, Ulmer U, van Geel HJGM, van Vliet MRA, Zissopoulos D (1997) Strain-softening of concrete in uniaxial compression. Mater Struct RILEM 30(198):195–209. (Report of the round robin test carried out by RILEM TC 198-SSC: test methods for the strain-softening response of concrete.)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kotsovos MD (1983) Effect of testing techniques on the post-ultimate behaviour of concrete in compression. Mater Struct RILEM 16(91):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Mier JGM (1986) Multiaxial strain-softening of concrete. Mater Struct RILEM 19(111):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kotsovos MD (1982) A fundamental explanation of the behaviour of reinforced concrete beams in flexure based on the properties of concrete under multiaxial stress. Mater Struct RILEM 15(90):529–537

    Google Scholar 

  33. Collins MP, Vecchio FJ, Selby RG, Gupta PR (1997) The failure of an offshore platform. Concr Int 28–34. Aug 1997

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shock collapse sparks lift slab fears and safety experts urge car park review (1997) New civil engineer, pp 3–4. 27 Mar/3 April 1997

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kellermann JF (1997) Riper row car park, Wolverhampton: results of the investigation. Conference on concrete car parks: design and maintenance issues held at the Cavendish Centre, London, 29 Sept 1997, British Cement Association

    Google Scholar 

  36. Priestley MJN (1997) Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering: conflicts between design and reality. Concr Int 54–63. Feb 1997

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hansford M (2002) Seismic codes oversimplified and unsafe. New civil engineer, 8/15 Aug 2002, p 28. (Report on seminar by V. Bertero organised jointly by ICE society for earthquake and civil engineering dynamics and Wessex institute of technology

    Google Scholar 

  38. Priestley MJN Revisiting myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering, the ninth Mallet-Milne lecture organised by the society for earthquake and civil engineering dynamics

    Google Scholar 

  39. Carpaer KL (1998) Current structural safety topics in North America. Struct Eng 76(12):233–239

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kani GNJ (1964) The riddle of shear and its solution. J Am Concr Inst Proc 61(4):441–467

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bobrowski J, Bardham-Roy BK (1969) A method of calculating the ultimate strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams in combined flexure and shear. Struct Eng 47(5):197–209

    Google Scholar 

  42. The Institution of Structural Engineers (1978) Design and detailing of concrete structures for fire resistance, interim guidance by a joint committee of the institution of structural engineers and the concrete society, April 1978, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  43. Il≪Saddledome≫: stadio olimpico del ghiaccio a Calgary (Canada) (1984) Progetto strutturale: Jan Bobrowski and Partners Ltd. Progetto architettonico: Graham McCourt. L’ Industria Italiana del Cemento. No. 5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Kotsovos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotsovos, M.D. (2014). Reappraisal of Concepts Underlying Reinforced-Concrete Design. In: Compressive Force-Path Method. Engineering Materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00488-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00488-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00487-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00488-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics