Skip to main content

Abstract

It is widely recognized that expected returns and covariances are not sufficient to characterize the statistical properties of securities in the context of portfolio selection. Therefore different models have been proposed. On one side the Markowitz model has been extended to higher moments and on the other side, starting from Sharpe ratio, a great attention has been addressed to the correct choice of the risk (or joint risk-performance) indicator. One such indicator has been proposed recently in the financial literature: the so-called Omega Function, that considers all the moments of the return distribution and whose properties are being investigated thoroughly. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically, in an out-of-sample perspective, the portfolios obtained using higher moments and the Omega ratio. Moreover we analyze the impact of the target threshold (when the Omega Ratio is used) and the impact of different preferences for moments and comoments (when a higher-moments approach is used) on portfolio allocation. Our empirical analysis is based on a portfolio composed of 12 Hedge fund indexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We chose the rolling window strategy 48-3 as this is commonly used in real hedge fund world where the data are scarce.

  2. 2.

    Actually, the term “polynomial” refers to the formulation whereby the aspiration levels are determined, not to the objective function of the main program.

  3. 3.

    The data have been collected through the Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Index.

  4. 4.

    The complete results are available upon request.

  5. 5.

    For the Omega ratio we have reported only the out-of-sample performances for τ = 3%,7%,8% on annual basis.

  6. 6.

    Sharpe=\(\frac{{{\mu _p} - \tau }}{{{\sigma _p}}}.\)

  7. 7.

    Sortino=\(\frac{{{\mu _p} - \tau }}{{\sqrt {LP{M_2}(\tau )} }}.\)

References

  1. Athayde, G., Flores, R.G.: The portfolio frontier with higher moments: The undiscovered country. Computing in Economics and Finance 2002 209, Society for Computational Economics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernardo, A., Ledoit, O., Brennan, M., Grinblatt, M., Roll, R., Santa-clara, P., Vila, J.: Gain, loss and asset pricing (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies, R., Harry, M.K., Sa, L.: Fund of hedge funds portfolio selection: A multiple-objective approach. Journal of derivatives & Hadge Funds 15, 91–115 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowd, K.: Adjusting for risk: An improved sharpe ratio. International Review of Economics & Finance 9(3), 209–222 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farinelli, S., Tibiletti, L.: Sharpe thinking in asset ranking with one-sided measures. European Journal of Operational Research 185(3), 1542–1547 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilli, M., Schumann, E., Tollo, G., Cabej, G.: Constructing long/short portfolios with the omega ratio. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 08–34, Swiss Finance Institute

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hitaj, A., Mercuri, L.: Portfolio allocation using multivariate variance gamma. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 27(1), 65–99 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, M.C.: The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance 23, 389–416 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jondeau, E., Poon, S., Rockinger, M.: Financial modeling under non-gaussian distributions. Springer Finance. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kane, S.J., Bartholomew, M.C., Cross, M., Dewar, M.: Optimizing omega. Journal of Global Optimization, 153-167 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, P.D, Knowles, J.A.: Kappa: A generalized downside risk-adjusted performance measure. January (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keating, C, Shadwick, W.F.: A universal performance measure. Technical report, The Finance development center, London, May (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kendall, M.G., Hill, A., Bradford: The analysis of economic Time-Series part i: Prices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 116(1), 11–34 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martellini, L., Ziemann, V.: Improved estimates of higher-order comoments and implications for portfolio selection. Review of Financial Studies 23(4), 1467–1502 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rachev, S.T., Stoyanov, S., Fabozzi, F.J.: Advanced Stochastic Models, Risk Assessment, and Portfolio. John Wiley (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharpe, W.: Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business 39, 119 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sortino, F.A., Price, L.N.: Performance measurement in a downside risk framework. Journal of Investing 3(3), 59–64 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tibiletti, L., Farinelli, S.: Upside and downside risk with a benchmark. Atlantic Economic Journal 31(4), 387–387 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zakamouline, V., Koekebakker, S.: Portfolio performance evaluation with generalized sharpe ratios: Beyond the mean and variance. Journal of Banking & Finance 33(7), 1242–1254 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Zambruno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hitaj, A., Martinelli, F., Zambruno, G. (2014). Portfolio Allocation Using Omega Function: An Empirical Analysis. In: Corazza, M., Pizzi, C. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02499-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics