Skip to main content

An Image Segmentation Process Enhancement for Land Cover Mapping from Very High Resolution Remote Sensing Data Application in a Rural Area

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe a procedure for enhancing the automatic image segmentation for land cover mapping from Very High Resolution images. The increased need for large scale mapping (1:10000) for local territorial monitoring led to think about mapping production. Nowadays mapping production for land cover and land use (LUC) is mainly performed with human photo-interpretation. This approach can be extremely time consuming, expensive and tedious for data producers. This is confirmed from the evidence of rural areas where the use of the GIS database for LUC is less numerous than the GIS urban database. In the last decade, Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) has been developed by the image processing community. This new paradigm builds on theory, methods and tools for replicating the human photo-interpretation process from remote sensing data (Hay and Castilla 2008). However, the GEOBIA community is still fragile and suffers from a lack of protocols and standards for operational LUC mapping applications. Currently, human photo-interpretation seems a safer option. The objective of this research is to find an alternative to this time consuming and expensive use of human expertise. We explored the limits of GEOBIA to propose an automatic image segmentation enhancement for an operational mapping application. Questions behind this study were: What is a good segmentation? How can we obtain it?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arvor D, Durieux L, Andrés S, Laporte M-A (2013) Advances in geographic object-based image analysis with ontologies: a review of main contributions and limitations from a remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 82:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baatz M, Benz U, Dehghani S, Heynen M, Höltje A, Hofmann P, Lingenfelder I, Mimler M, Sohlbach M, Weber M (2004) eCognition professional user guide 4. Definiens Imaging, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for gis-ready information. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 58:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 65:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T, Strobl J (2001) What’s wrong with pixels? some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and gis. Interfacing Remote Sens GIS 6:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch I, Gousseau Y, Maître H, Matignon D, Pesquet-Popescu B, Schmitt F, Sigelle M, Tupin F (2004) Le traitement des images. Polycopié du cours ANIM, Département TSI-Télécom-París, p 370

    Google Scholar 

  • Caloz R, Collet C (2001) Traitements numériques d’images de télédétection. Précis de télédétection. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Agence universitaire de la Francophonie, Québec, Montréal, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilla G, Hay GJ (2008) Image objects and geographic objects. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ, (eds) Object-based image analysis. Springer, Berlin, p 91–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorren KKA, Maier B, Seijmonsbergen AC (2003) Improved landsat-based forest mapping in steep mountainous terrain using object-based classification. For Ecol Manage 183:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drǎgut L, Tiede D, Levick SR (2010) Esp: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24:859–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drǎgut L, Csillick O, Eisank C, Tiede D (2014) Automated parameterization for multi-scale image segmentation on multiple layers. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 88:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (1987) Spatial autocorrelation. Association of American Geographers, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3(6):610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay GJ, Castilla G (2008) Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): a new name for a new discipline. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ (eds) Object-based image analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp. 75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert P (2000) The segmentation procedure as a tool for discrete modeling of hydrometeorological regimes. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 14:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jappiot M, Philibert-Caillat C, Borgniet L, Dumas E, Alibert N (2003) Analyse spatiale des interfaces agriculture-forêt-urbain. Ingénieries Numéro Spécial, pp 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Madden M, Warner T (2008) Estimation of optimal image object size for the segmentation of forest stands with multispectral IKONOS imagery. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ (eds) Object-based image analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp. 291–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Madden M, Warner T (2009) Forest type mapping using object-specific texture measures from multispectral ikonos imagery: segmentation quality and image classification issues. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 75:819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre A, Corpetti T, Hubert-Moy L (2008), Object-oriented approach and texture analysis for change detection in very high resolution images. In: IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, IGARSS 2008, pp IV–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Marpu PR, Neubert M, Herold H, Niemeyer I (2009) Enhanced evaluation of image segmentation results. J Spat Sci 55:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinel G, Neubert M (2004) A comparison of segmentation programs for high resolution remote sensing data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens 35:1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert M, Herold H (2008), Assessment of remote sensing image segmentation quality. In Proceedings of the GEOBIA international archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial, information sciences, vol XXXVIII-4/C1

    Google Scholar 

  • Provencher L, Dubois J-MM (2007) Méthode de photointerprétation et d’interprétation d’image. Précis de télédétection. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Agence universitaire de la Francophonie, Québec, Montréal, p 504

    Google Scholar 

  • Santilli S (2013) On the fly simplification of topologically defined geometries. Strk’s Blog. http://strk.keybit.net/blog/

  • Schiewe J, Tufte L, Ehlers M (2001) Potential and problems of multi-scale segmentation methods in remote sensing. GeoBIT/GIS 6:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A (2005) Application de l’approche orientée-objet à l’extraction de fragments forestiers à partir de scènes Spot. DESS SIGMA, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock CE, Strahler AH (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 21:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Xiao P, Feng X (2012) An unsupervised evaluation method for remotely sensed imagery segmentation. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lette 9:156–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Vitter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vitter, M., Pluvinet, P., Vaudor, L., Jacqueminet, C., Martin, R., Etlicher, B. (2014). An Image Segmentation Process Enhancement for Land Cover Mapping from Very High Resolution Remote Sensing Data Application in a Rural Area. In: Huerta, J., Schade, S., Granell, C. (eds) Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03611-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics