Skip to main content

Evaluating the Seeding Genetic Algorithm

  • Conference paper
AI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8272))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we present new experimental results supporting the Seeding Genetic Algorithm (SGA). We evaluate the algorithm’s performance with various parameterisations, making comparisons to the Canonical Genetic Algorithm (CGA), and use these as guidelines as we establish reasonable parameters for the seeding algorithm. We present experimental results confirming aspects of the theoretical basis, such as the exclusion of the deleterious mutation operator from the new algorithm, and report results on GA-difficult problems which demonstrate the SGA’s ability to overcome local optima and systematic deception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Forrest, S., Mitchell, M.: Relative building-block fitness and the building-block hypothesis. In: Whitley, L. (ed.) Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, pp. 109–126 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner, C., Riddle, P.: Random search can outperform mutation. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Skinner, C.: On the discovery, selection and combination of building blocks in evolutionary algorithms. PhD thesis, Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meadows, B., Riddle, P., Skinner, C., Barley, M.: Evaluating the seeding genetic algorithm (2013), http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pat/AI2013-long.pdf

  5. De Jong, K.A.: Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. PhD thesis, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, M., Forrest, S.: B. 2.7. 5: Fitness landscapes: Royal road functions. Handbook of evolutionary computation (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Watson, R.A., Pollack, J.B.: Recombination without respect: Schema combination and disruption in genetic algorithm crossover. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pp. 112–119 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg, D.E.: Simple genetic algorithms and the minimal, deceptive problem. Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing 74 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, P., Kim, J.: A bootstrap test for comparing performance of programs when data are censored, and comparisons to Etzioni’s test. Technical report, University of Massachusetts (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meadows, B., Riddle, P., Skinner, C., Barley, M.M. (2013). Evaluating the Seeding Genetic Algorithm. In: Cranefield, S., Nayak, A. (eds) AI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8272. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03680-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03680-9_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03679-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03680-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics