Abstract
This paper starts by providing a succinct overview of the sensorimotor approach to phenomenal consciousness, describing its two parts: the part that concerns the quality of sensations, and the part that concerns whether or not such qualities are (consciously) experienced. The paper goes on to discuss the explanatory status of the approach, claiming that the approach does not simply “explain away” qualia, but that on the contrary, it provides a way of thinking about qualia that explains why they are the way they are, stimulates scientific paradigms and produces testable predictions. A final part of the paper examines the relation of the theory to radical enactivism, claiming that some kind of “higher order” cognitive mechanism similar to that used in Higher Order Thought theories of consciousness is needed to account for what is usually meant by being conscious of something.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
O’Regan, J.K.: Why red doesn’t sound like a bell: Understanding the feel of consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)
O’Regan, J.K., Noë, A.: A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24(5), 883–917 (2001)
Nagel, T.: What is it like to be a bat? Philos. Rev. 83, 435–456 (1974)
O’Regan, J.K., Myin, E., Noë, A.: Towards an analytic phenomenology: the concepts of ‘bodiliness’ and ‘grabbiness’. In: Carsetti, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Colloquium: Seeing and Thinking. Reflections on Kanizsa’s Studies in Visual Cognition, University Tor Vergata, Rome, June 8-9, pp. 103–114. Kluwer (2004)
Rosenthal, D.M.: From Rocco Gennaro (ed). In: Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness: An Anthology, pp. 17–44. Johns Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2004)
Carruthers, P.: Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition) (2011)
Ryle, G.: The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press (1949)
Hutto, D.D., Myin, E.: Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)
O’Regan, J.K., Block, N.: Discussion of J. Kevin O’Regan’s ‘Why Red Doesn’t Sound Like a Bell: Understanding the Feel of Consciousness’. Rev. Philos. Psychol., 1–20 (2012)
Gallagher, S.: Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 14–21 (2000)
Thompson, E.: Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind, vol. xiv. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Rosenthal, D.M.: Consciousness and mind. Oxford University Press (2005)
Clark, A.: A Case where Access Implies Qualia. Analysis 60(265), 30–37 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
O’Regan, J.K. (2014). The Explanatory Status of the Sensorimotor Approach to Phenomenal Consciousness, and Its Appeal to Cognition. In: Bishop, J., Martin, A. (eds) Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05106-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05107-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)