Skip to main content

SCAI: Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluation of Online Higher Education

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

  • 1172 Accesses

Abstract

After establishing the theoretical framework underlying the tool for the evaluation of e-teaching in HE put forward—SCAI—, its applicability was tested and validated through an empirical study. Thus, SCAI was applied, still in paper version, to two third cycle degree courses offered in b-learning (academic year 2009/2010), in Portugal. The study was restricted, in terms of timing, to the evaluation of e-teaching activities in every subject that took place in the first semester. In this Chapter, an analysis of the results obtained for these courses are put forward, namely, as to the Doctoral Program in the Ancient World (DPAW) of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities—University of Coimbra and the Doctoral Program in Multimedia in Education (DPME), Department of Education—University of Aveiro. Regarding the data gathered using the SCAI, both the teachers’ and students’ perspectives were considered; besides, the course coordinators were also asked to briefly describe the courses’ organization, the assumptions underpinning the course outline, as well as the reasons for choosing a b-learning modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A/C—as Authentic and Conceptual, +I/S—more Individual than Social, Int/Inst—as Integrated and Instrumental.

  2. 2.

    A/C—as Authentic and Conceptual, S/I—as Social and Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated and Instrumental.

  3. 3.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, S/I—as Social as Individual, +Inst/Int—more Instrumental than Integrated.

  4. 4.

    +C/A—more Conceptual than Authentic, S/I—as Social as Individual, +Inst/Int—more Instrumental than Integrated.

  5. 5.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, +I/S—more Individual than Social, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  6. 6.

    +C/A—more Conceptual than Authentic, S/I—more Social than Individual, +Inst/Int—as Instrumental as Integrated.

  7. 7.

    A/C—as Conceptual as Authentic, +I/S—more Individual than Social, +Int/Inst—more Integrated than Instrumental.

  8. 8.

    Please note this activity (Activity 3—Individual exercises) was not selected by the teachers in Subj2 and Subj3.

  9. 9.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, +I/S—more Individual than Social, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  10. 10.

    +C/A—more Conceptual than Authentic, +I/S—more Individual than Social, +Inst/Int—more Instrumental than Integrated.

  11. 11.

    Question 1, Part III of the questionnaire for teachers (document “Appendix I”).

  12. 12.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, S/I—as Social as Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  13. 13.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, S/I—as Social as Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  14. 14.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, S/I—as Social as Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  15. 15.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, +S/I—more Social than Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  16. 16.

    +C/A—more Conceptual than Authentic, S/I—as Social as Individual, Int/Inst—more Integrated than Instrumental.

  17. 17.

    A/C—as Authentic as Conceptual, +S/I—more Social than Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

  18. 18.

    +C/A – more Conceptual than Authentic, +S/I—more Social than Individual, Int/Inst—as Instrumental as Integrated.

  19. 19.

    +C/A—more Conceptual than Authentic, +S/I—more Social than Individual, Int/Inst—as Integrated as Instrumental.

References

  • Hayes, G. (2006). Virtual worlds, Web 3.0 and portable profiles. Retrieved February 3, 2009 from http://www.personalizemedia.com/virtual-worlds-web-30-and-portable-profiles/

  • Julien, H. (2008). Survey research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 846–848). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reding, V. (2006). The disruptive force of Web 2.0: How the new generation will define the future. (SPEECH/06/773). Retrieved March 16, 2009 from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleases Action.do?reference=SPEECH/06/773andformat=HTMLandaged=1andlanguage=ENandguiLanguage=pt

  • Rothbauer, P. (2008). Triangulation. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 892–894). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balula, A., Moreira, A. (2014). SCAI: Implementation. In: Evaluation of Online Higher Education. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05425-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics