Skip to main content

Adapting and Implementing a CDIO Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Engineering Education

Abstract

Adapting and implementing a CDIO approach can be of great value to educational programs and the students they serve. However, that means change—an inherently challenging endeavor, especially at a university. Program leaders are more likely to succeed in this change process if faculty are equipped with an understanding of how to bring about change and provided with relevant guidance and resources.

This chapter is written with the support of authors Daryl G. Boden and Nhut Tan Ho.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rudolph, F. (1990). The American college and university: A history. Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bush, V. (1945). Science the endless frontier. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gleicher, D., Beckhard, R., & Harris, R. (2014). Change model formula, 1987. Available at http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net. Accessed January 8, 2014.

  4. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, March-April.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eijkman, H., Kayali, O., & Yeomans, S. (2009). Using soft systems thinking to confront the politics of innovation in engineering education. In A. Patil & P. Gray (Eds.), Engineering education quality assurance: A global perspective (pp. 223–234). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolmos, A., & Graaf, E. (2007). Management of Change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Bologna Process. (2014). Available at http://www.ond.vlaanderon.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna. Accessed January 8, 2014.

  8. Wallace, K. (Ed.). (2005). Educating engineers in design: Lessons learnt from the visiting professors scheme. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London. Available at http://www.raeng.org.uk. Accessed January 8, 2014.

  9. Bonwell, C. C., & Sutherland, T. E. (1996). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, New Directions of Teaching and Learning, No. 67. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris R. Brodeur .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edström, K. (2014). Adapting and Implementing a CDIO Approach. In: Rethinking Engineering Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05560-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05561-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics