Skip to main content

Thermodynamic Properties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanofluidics

Abstract

The equilibrium thermodynamic properties of nanofluids are important variables that are used in all engineering applications. Since the nanofluids are mixtures of liquids and solid particles, the determination of their thermodynamic properties may be accomplished using the theory of heterogeneous mixtures and the corresponding properties of the constituent materials (The Collective Works of J. Willard Gibbs, Longmans, New York, NY, 1878). In this chapter we derive the functional form of several equilibrium thermodynamic properties of these heterogeneous mixtures. Pressure and temperature are intensive properties and do not depend on the mass or the volume of the system. Of the other properties, the extensive properties are proportional to the mass of the system. For every extensive property, one may define the relevant specific property, which is equal to the ratio of the corresponding extensive property and the mass of the system. The density of the system, which is the inverse of the specific volume, and its derivative properties are treated separately.

Intrinsic chemical reactions or other energy releases that may take place between the constituents of the nanofluid are taken into account in the derivation of the energy-related properties. Because certain inaccurate “alternative models” for well-defined properties have appeared in the nanofluids literature, the derivation of the thermodynamic properties of nanofluids is accomplished in detail using the methodology of thermodynamics and the applicable conservation principles. Two implicit assumptions in all the derivations of this chapter—as well as in the engineering uses of the equilibrium thermodynamic properties—are the following:

  1. (a)

    The system under observation is in local thermodynamic equilibrium.

  2. (b)

    The volume of the system is large enough to be treated as a continuum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following the thermodynamic convention, extensive properties are denoted with capital letters; specific properties with the corresponding low-case letter; and intensive properties (only P and T are of interest) with capital letters.

  2. 2.

    If the mass of the surfactants that are often used to stabilize the nanofluid is comparable to the mass of the nanoparticles, then the surfactant must also be taken into account in the calculation of the properties as a third component.

  3. 3.

    With specific heat capacity c = 3.58 kJ/kg K, lithium is the only solid element whose specific heat is significantly higher than that of several base fluids.

  4. 4.

    The motion and vibrations of molecules in the liquid state as well as for very dense gases are too complex for accurate, analytical expressions for the specific heat to be derived from first principles.

  5. 5.

    The situation is entirely different for gases, where the significant differences between enthalpy and internal energy changes are reflected in the significant differences of the two specific heats for ideal gases: c p  − c v = R.

References

  • Agwa-Nnanna, A. G. (2007). Experimental model of temperature driven nanofluid. Journal of Heat Transfer, 129, 697–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan, A. (2006). Advanced engineering thermodynamics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, T. L. (2009). Effect of reduced specific heats of nanofluids on single phase, laminar internal forced convection. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 52, 1240–1244.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, E. R. G., & Drake, R. M. (1972). Analysis of heat and mass transfer. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. W. (1878). On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. In The collective works of J. Willard Gibbs. New York, NY: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin, L., & da Silva, A. K. (2004). Combined “heat transfer and power dissipation” optimization of nanofluid flows. Applied Physics Letters, 85, 4160–4162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. L. (1986). An introduction to statistical thermodynamics. New York, NY: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. J., Liu, W. K., Chang, Y. S., & Lin, C. C. (2010). Natural convection heat transfer of alumina–water nanofluid in vertical square enclosures: An experimental study. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 49, 1345–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incropera, F. P., & DeWitt, D. P. (2000). Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kestin, J. (1978). A course in thermodynamics (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanafer, K., & Vafai, K. (2011). A critical synthesis of thermophysical characteristics of nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 54, 4410–4428.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Mudawar, I. (2007). Assessment of the effectiveness of nanofluids for single phase and two-phase heat transfer in micro-channels. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 50, 452–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. F., Sears, F. W., & Turcotte, D. L. (1963). Statistical thermodynamics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelides, E. E. (2013a). Transport properties of nanofluids—A critical review. Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 38, 1–79.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelides, E. E. (2013b). Variation of the expansion coefficient of nanofluids with temperature—A correction for conductivity data. Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine, 3, 44502-1–44502-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. J., & Shapiro, H. N. (2008). Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanley, H., Buongiorno, J., McKrell, T., & Ho, L. (2012). Measurement and model validation of nanofluid specific heat capacity with differential scanning calorimetry. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. doi:10.1155/2012/181079.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, I. C., Banerjee, D., & Rengasamy, P. (2009). Flow loop experiments using polyalphaolefin nanofluids. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 23(4), 752–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pak, B. C., & Cho, Y. (1998). Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental Heat Transfer, 11, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm, S. J., Roy, G., & Nguyen, C. T. (2006). Heat transfer enhancement with the use of nanofluids in radial flow cooling systems considering temperature-dependent properties. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26, 2209–2218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polidori, G., Fohanno, S., & Nguyen, C. T. (2007). A note on heat transfer modeling of Newtonian nanofluids in laminar free convection. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46, 739744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D., & Banerjee, D. (2010). Effects of silica nanoparticles on enhancing the specific heat capacity of carbonate salt eutectic. International Journal of Structural Changes in Solids, 2, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D., & Banerjee, D. (2011). Enhancement of specific heat capacity of high-temperature silica-nanofluids synthesized in alkali chloride salt eutectics for solar thermal-energy storage applications. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 54, 1064–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M., Van Ness, H. C., & Abbott, M. M. (2005). Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, T. P., & Hung, Y. H. (2012). Estimation and experimental study of the density and specific heat for alumina nanofluid. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, 1–12. doi:10.1080/17458080.2012.696219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, C. L., & Lienhard, J. H. (1979). Statistical thermodynamics (revised printing). New York, NY: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B. X., Zhou, L. P., & Peng, X. F. (2006). Surface and size effects on the specific heat capacity of nanoparticles. International Journal of Thermophysics, 27, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, S. Q., & Ni, R. (2008). Measurement of the specific heat capacity of water-based Al2O3 nanofluid. Applied Physics Letters, 92, 093123-1–093123-3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Specific Heat Differences for Liquids and Solids

Appendix: Specific Heat Differences for Liquids and Solids

Consider the Gibbs equations for internal energy and enthalpy :

$$ \mathrm{d}u=T\mathrm{d}s-P\mathrm{d}v $$
(3.58)

and

$$ \mathrm{d}h=T\mathrm{d}s-v\mathrm{d}P. $$
(3.59)

One may use these differentials to obtain two expressions for the specific heats in terms of the entropy function as follows:

$$ {c}_v={\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial T}\right)}_v=T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial T}\right)}_v $$
(3.60)

and

$$ {c}_P={\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)}_P=T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial T}\right)}_P, $$
(3.61)

Because entropy is a thermodynamic property, for homogeneous substances it may be expressed in terms of any two independent variables. Using the functional forms for entropy, s = s(T, v) and s = s(T, P), we obtain the following two expressions for the differential ds:

$$ \mathrm{d}s={\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial T}\right)}_v\mathrm{d}T+{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial v}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}v=\frac{c_v}{T}\mathrm{d}T+{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial v}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}v $$
(3.62)

and

$$ \mathrm{d}s={\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial T}\right)}_P\mathrm{d}T+{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}P=\frac{c_P}{T}\mathrm{d}T+{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}P. $$
(3.63)

Since the l.h.s. of Eqs. (3.62) and (3.63) are identical, we may use the equality of the r.h.s. of these equations to obtain the following expression for the difference of the two specific heats:

$$ \left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)\mathrm{d}T=T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial v}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}v-T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}P. $$
(3.64)

Now we use the functional form of the equation of state P = (T, v) to obtain the following expression for the differential dP:

$$ \mathrm{d}P={\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}T}\right)}_v\mathrm{d}T+{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}v}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}v. $$
(3.65)

Substitution of the dP term in Eq. (3.64) from Eq. (3.65) yields

$$ \left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)\mathrm{d}T=T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial v}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}v-T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T\left[{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}T}\right)}_v\mathrm{d}T+{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}v}\right)}_T\mathrm{d}v\right] $$
(3.66)

or

$$ \left[\left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)+T{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}T}\right)}_v\right]\mathrm{d}T=T\left[{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial v}\right)}_T-{\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}v}\right)}_T\right]\mathrm{d}v. $$
(3.67)

The partial derivatives of the entropy function may be expressed in terms of derivatives involving the variables, P, v, and T, using the two Maxwell’s equations:

$$ {\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial P}\right)}_T=-{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\kern0.5em {\left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial v}\right)}_T={\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)}_v. $$
(3.68)

Substituting the expression from Eq. (3.68) into Eq. (3.67) yields

$$ \left[\left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)-T{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}T}\right)}_v\right]\mathrm{d}T=T\left[{\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)}_v+{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}v}\right)}_T\right]\mathrm{d}v. $$
(3.69)

The variables T and v are independent variables in all substances—homogeneous and nonhomogeneous—and may vary independently. Therefore, the terms in square brackets must vanish for the equation to hold. This yields the following expression for the difference of the two specific heats:

$$ \left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)=T{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}P}{\mathrm{d}T}\right)}_v. $$
(3.70)

The last equation expresses the difference of the two specific heats in terms of the measurable P, v, and T variables. It is apparent that for incompressible substances (v = constant) the difference of the two specific heats vanishes, that is,

$$ {c}_P={c}_v=c. $$
(3.71)

Liquid water and other commonly used base fluids are not exactly incompressible substances: their specific volume is a weak function of pressure and temperature. The effect of the pressure and temperature on the specific heats of all the materials may be calculated using the two expansion coefficients, β and κ T , which are defined as

$$ {\beta}_P\equiv \frac{1}{v}{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\kern0.5em {\kappa}_T\equiv -\frac{1}{v}{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial P}\right)}_T. $$
(3.72)

From the functional form of the equation of state for any substance, P = (T, v), we obtain the identity

$$ {\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)}_v{\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial v}\right)}_P{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial P}\right)}_T\equiv -1\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\kern0.5em {\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)}_v\equiv -{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P{\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial v}\right)}_T. $$
(3.73)

Equation (3.70) may now be transformed into the following form in terms of the variables P, v, and T and the two expansion coefficients:

$$ \left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)=-\frac{T{\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)}_P^2}{{\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}v}{\mathrm{d}P}\right)}_T}\Rightarrow \left({c}_P-{c}_v\right)= Tv\frac{\beta_P^2}{\kappa_T}. $$
(3.74)

For liquid water in the range of 0–100 °C (273–373 K), v ≈ 0.001 m3/kg, β P  ≈ 3 × 10−7 K−1, and κ T  ≈ 4 × 10−12 Pa−1. Then the last equation gives for the difference of the two specific heats as c P  − c v  ≈ 0.007 J/kg K. Given that the value of c P for water is approximately 4,180 J/kg K, this difference is negligible and the approximation of Eq. (3.71) is accurate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michaelides, E.E.(. (2014). Thermodynamic Properties. In: Nanofluidics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05621-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05621-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05620-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05621-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics