Abstract
Automatic methods of ontology alignment are essential for establishing interoperability across web services. These methods are needed to measure semantic similarity between two ontologies’ entities to discover reliable correspondences. While existing similarity measures suffer from some difficulties, semantic relatedness measures tend to yield better results; even though they are not completely appropriate for the ‘equivalence’ relationship (e.g. “blood” and “bleeding” related but not similar). We attempt to adapt Gloss Vector relatedness measure for similarity estimation. Generally, Gloss Vector uses angles between entities’ gloss vectors for relatedness calculation. After employing Pearson’s chi-squared test for statistical elimination of insignificant features to optimize entities’ gloss vectors, by considering concepts’ taxonomy, we enrich them for better similarity measurement. Discussed measures get evaluated in the biomedical domain using MeSH, MEDLINE and dataset of 301 concept pairs. We conclude Adapted Gloss Vector similarity results are more correlated with human judgment of similarity compared to other measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Muthaiyah, S., Kerschberg, L.: A hybrid ontology mediation approach for the semantic web. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. 4, 79–91 (2008)
Chen, B., Foster, G., Kuhn, R.: Bilingual sense similarity for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the ACL, pp. 834–843 (2010)
Pesaranghader, A., Mustapha, N., Pesaranghader, A.: Applying semantic similarity measures to enhance topic-specific web crawling. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA’13), pp. 205–212 (2013)
Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43, 907–928 (1995)
Firth, J.R.: A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In: Firth, J.R. (ed.) Studies in Linguistic Analysis, pp. 1–32. Blackwell, Oxford (1957)
Lesk, M.: Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice-cream cone. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation, New York, USA, pp. 24–26 (1986)
Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T.: An adapted Lesk algorithm for word sense disambiguation using WordNet. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2002. LNCS, vol. 2276, pp. 136–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Patwardhan, S., Pedersen, T: Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2006 Workshop (2006)
Liu, Y., McInnes, B.T., Pedersen, T., Melton-Meaux, G., Pakhomov. S.: Semantic relatedness study using second order co-occurrence vectors computed from biomedical corpora, UMLS and WordNet. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT IHI (2012)
Pesaranghader, A., Pesaranghader, A., Rezaei, A.: Applying latent semantic analysis to optimize second-order co-occurrence vectors for semantic relatedness measurement. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration (MIKE’13), pp. 588–599 (2013)
Pesaranghader, A., Pesaranghader, A., Rezaei, A.: Augmenting concept definition in gloss vector semantic relatedness measure using Wikipedia articles. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Data Engineering (DeEng-2013), pp. 623–630 (2014)
Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19, 17–30 (1989)
Caviedes, J., Cimino, J.: Towards the development of a conceptual distance metric for the UMLS. J. Biomed. Inf. 372, 77–85 (2004)
Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantics and lexical selections. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (1994)
Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 265–283. MIT press, Cambridge (1998)
Zhong, J., Zhu, H., Li, J., Yu, Y.: Conceptual graph matching for semantic search. In: Priss, U., Corbett, D.R., Angelova, G. (eds.) ICCS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2393, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Nguyen, H.A., Al-Mubaid, H.: New ontology-based semantic similarity measure for the biomedical domain. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing GrC’06, pp. 623–628 (2006)
Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)
Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics (1997)
Lin, D.: An Information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, USA, (1998)
Pesaranghader, A., Muthaiyah, S.: Definition-based information content vectors for semantic similarity measurement. In: Noah, S.A., Abdullah, A., Arshad, H., Abu Bakar, A., Othman, Z.A., Sahran, S., Omar, N., Othman, Z. (eds.) M-CAIT 2013. CCIS, vol. 378, pp. 268–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Pakhomov, S., McInnes, B., Adam, T., Liu, Y., Pedersen, T., Melton, G.: Semantic similarity and relatedness between clinical terms: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of AMIA, pp. 572–576 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pesaranghader, A., Rezaei, A., Pesaranghader, A. (2014). Adapting Gloss Vector Semantic Relatedness Measure for Semantic Similarity Estimation: An Evaluation in the Biomedical Domain. In: Kim, W., Ding, Y., Kim, HG. (eds) Semantic Technology. JIST 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06826-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06826-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06825-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06826-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)