Skip to main content

How to Evaluate Employer Brands: A Monetary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Resource Management Practices

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

The attraction and retention of superior talents is increasingly becoming a key challenge for many organizations. To cope with the ongoing shortage of talented people, academics and practitioners agree on the pivotal role of an attractive employer brand to succeed in the persistent war for talent. The evaluation of employer brands is therefore of critical importance for human resource managers to assess their potential to attract talents and to benchmark the effectiveness of their employer branding activities. However, appropriate key figures to evaluate employer brands are scarce. In light of this shortcoming, the chapter presents a monetary approach to evaluate employer brands. Moreover, this study investigates the impact of relevant employer branding factors on the monetary evaluation of employer brands. The presented employer brand value score model provides a monetary key figure that allows a detailed and monetary evaluation of employer brands in comparison to relevant competitors and with respect to different target groups. Results of the empirical study support the validity of the model to capture the evaluation of employer brands in a monetary key figure and highlight the importance of a segmented approach to employer branding.

Parts of this chapter are based on the work of Güntürkün et al. (2012). The authors would like to thank Sven Mikolon for his helpful comments and Roland Kassemeier for his formatting assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For aggregated data, however, the MEBS can also take values below zero. Nevertheless, the interpretation remains the same, as lower MEBS are generally associated with more attractive employer brands.

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. The Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185–206. doi:10.1057/bm.1996.42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(4/5), 501–517. doi:10.1108/13620430410550754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, S., & Mosley, R. (2005). The employer brand. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttger, E. (2012). Employer branding. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2009). Leader-follower values congruence: Are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 478–490. doi:10.1037/a0014069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). The value of organizational image in the recruitment context: A brand equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2244–2266. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01883.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, E. G., Fouldon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michaels, E. G., III. (1998). The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 928–944. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIPD. (2009). Employer branding: Maintaining momentum in a recession. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) guide. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. J., & Stevens, C. K. (2002). The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: A brand equity approach to recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1121–1133. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission, E. (2011). Demography report 2010 – Older, more numerous and diverse Europeans. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, D., Ainspan, N., Bodenberg, T., Troy, K., & Hickey, J. (2001). Engaging employees through your brand (Research Report 1288-01-RR). New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. R. (2010). An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory. Personnel Review, 39(1–2), 5–23. doi:10.1108/00483481011012809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, P. H. (1989). Managing brand equity. Marketing Research, 1(3), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güntürkün, P., Haumann, T., Koch, H., & Lukasczyk, A. (2012). Ein monetärer Ansatz zur ganzheitlichen Erfassung des Employer Brandings. Personal Quarterly, 64(4), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltrop, J. M. (1999). The quest for the best: Human resource practices to attract and retain talent. European Management Journal, 17(4), 422–430. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00022-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 75–102. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00144.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. S., & Triest, R. K. (2001). The impact of demographic change on U.S. labor markets. In J. S. Little & R. K. Triest (Eds.), Conference series 46: Seismic shifts: The economic impact of demographic change (pp. 131–167). Boston: Boston Federal Reserve Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S. (2002). Branding from the inside out. BRW, 24(10), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasczyk, A. (2012). Vom Personalmarketing zum Employer Branding. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Personalführung e.V. (Ed.), Employer Branding: Die Arbeitsmarke gestalten und im Personalmarketing umsetzen (pp. 11–19). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G., & Beaumont, P. (2003). Branding and people management. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) research report. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J., & Hamm, S. (2008). Davos special report: Managing the global workforce. Business Week, 28(1), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minchington, B. (2011). 2011 employer branding global research study. Torrensville: Collective Learning Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture – A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516. doi:10.2307/256404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 271–288. doi:10.2307/3152199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. Unleashing the power of the work force. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, P. (2012). Interviewed by Olivia Stern. Rotterdam: Bloomberg television. http://wapo.st/w65aH5. Accessed 04 November 2013.

  • Posner, B. Z. (1981). Comparing recruiter, student, and faculty perceptions of important applicant and job characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 34(2), 329–339. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb00946.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resick, C. J., Baltes, B. B., & Shantz, C. W. (2007). Person–organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1446–1455. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yapp, M. (2009). Measuring the ROI of talent management. Strategic HR Review, 8(4), 5–10. doi:10.1108/14754390910963856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Güntürkün .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Güntürkün, P., Haumann, T., Lukasczyk, A. (2015). How to Evaluate Employer Brands: A Monetary Approach. In: Andresen, M., Nowak, C. (eds) Human Resource Management Practices. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08186-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics