Abstract
Though the use of multifocal intraocular lenses is rapidly increasing, in some cases special considerations about the efficacy, safeness, and patient’s well-being should be taken into account. Using these lenses in children can be of benefit because of the possibility for rapid rehabilitation of far, intermediate, and near vision; improved chance of binocularity; reduced risk of amblyopia; no need for bifocals; and a better self-estimation of the child. On the other hand, implanting multifocal intraocular lenses, we might reduce contrast sensitivity and intermediate vision and exacerbate amblyopia. Another special case is when treating glaucoma patients. Glaucoma patients, with no or slight visual field damage and controlled intraocular tension, may be also considered today as candidates for multifocal intraocular lens implant. However, patients with advanced glaucoma, significant visual field defects, or uncontrolled intraocular tension as well as patients with a glaucomatous damage in the other eye are not adequate candidates for this operation. As with glaucoma patients, patients that suffer from maculopathy should be carefully selected and preoperative assessed for multifocal intraocular lens implant. Some of these patients, dependent on their retinal status, will benefit from multifocal intraocular lenses. In patients that suffer from amblyopia, implanting multifocal intraocular lenses does not exacerbate amblyopia though there is a reduction in contrast sensitivity. Another situation to consider is the ocular surface health and integrity as well as the function of the lacrimal system and all its components. A healthy ocular surface is a key factor in achieving a successful result in multifocal intraocular lenses implant. Since the corneal tear film is actually the first refractive plane of the eye, its healthiness and integrity is important in reaching the aim of having the light rays uninterrupted focusing on the retina. Dry eye and ocular surface problems should be diagnosed and treated preoperatively but should not prevent multifocal intraocular lens implant and the patients to benefit from it. In treating unilateral cataract, some difficulties may arise, though bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses implant is favorable; in cases of unilateral cataract, patients gain more from these lenses compared to monofocal lenses, overcoming the reduction in contrast sensitivity. Though neuroadaptation might be more difficult or take longer even in unilateral cases, multifocal intraocular lenses implant is favorable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rychwalski PJ. Multifocal IOL implantation in children: is the future clear? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2019–21.
Hunter DG. Multifocal intraocular lenses in children. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1373–4.
Brown SM, Archer S, Del Monte MA. Stereopsis and binocular vision after surgery for unilateral infantile cataract. J AAPOS. 1999;3:109–13.
Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Burger BM. Eye growth in the second decade of life implications for the implantation of multifocal intraocular lens. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:120–4.
Cristobal JA, Ramon L, Del Buey MA, Montes-Mico R. Multifocal intraocular lenses for unilateral cataract in children. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2035–40.
Kameth GG, Prasad S, Danson A, Phillips RP. Visual outcome with the array multifocal intraocular lens in patients with concurrent eye disease. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:576–81.
Kumar BV, Phillips RP, Prasad S. Multifocal intraocular lenses in the setting of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:62–6.
Paletla Guedes RA, Paletla Guedes VM, Aptel F. Multifocal, toric and aspheric intraocular lenses for glaucoma patients. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2011;34(6):387–91.
Montes-Mico R, Espana E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(1):85–96.
Hawkins AS, Szlyk JP, Ardickas Z, Alexander KR, Wilensky JT. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:134–8.
Mainster MA, Turner PL. Multifocal IOLs and maculopathy – how much is too much? In: Chang DF, editor. Mastering refractive IOLs – the art and science. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2008. p. 389–94.
Gayton JL, Mackool RJ, Ernest PH, Seabolt RA, Dumont S. Implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses using a magnification strategy in cataractous eyes with age-related macular degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(3):415–8.
de Wit DW, Diaz JM, Moore TC, Moore JE. Refractive lens exchange for a multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section in mild to moderate anisometropic amblyopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(10):1796–801.
Petermeier K, Gekeler F, Messias A, Spitzer MS, Haigis W, Szurman P. Implantation of multifocal ReSTOR apodised diffractive intraocular lens in adults with mild to moderate amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(10):1296–301.
Reeves SW, Llndstrom RL. Optimizing the ocular surface preoperatively. In: Chang DF, editor. Mastering refractive IOLs – the art and science. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2008. p. 571–4.
Donnenfeld ED, Solomon R, Roberts CW, Wittpenn JR, McDonald MB, Perry HD. Cyclosporine 0.05 % to improve visual outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(7):1095–100.
Mino de Kaspar H, Shriver EM, Nguyen EV, Egbert PR, Singh K, Blumenkranz MS. Risk factors for antibiotic-resistant conjunctival bacterial flora in patients undergoing intraocular surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241(9):730–3.
Newman H, Gooding C. Viral ocular manifestations: a broad overview. Rev Med Virol. 2013;23(5):281–94.
Goldberg DF. Preoperative evaluation of patients before cataract and refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011;51(2):97–107.
Creuzot C, Passemard M, Viau S, Joffre C, Pouliquen P, Elena PP, Bron A, Brignole F. Improvement of dry eye symptoms with poly-unsaturated fatty acids. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2006;29(8):868–73.
McDonald II JE. Neuroadaptation to monovision. In: Chang DF, editor. Mastering refractive IOLs – the art and science. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2008. p. 295–301.
Mesci C, Erbil HH, Olgun A, Yaylali SA. Visual performance with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(5):609–18.
Cionni RJ, Osher RH, Snyder ME, Nordlund ML. Visual outcome comparison of unilateral versus bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction: prospective 6 month study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):1033–9.
Hyashi K, Manabe S, Yoshimura K, Hirata A. Binocular visual function with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens in patients with unilateral cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(6):851–8.
Compliance with Ethical Requirements
Jorge L. Alio & Joseph Pikkel declare that they have no conflict of interest.
No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alió, J.L., Pikkel, J. (2014). Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Special Cases. In: Alió, J., Pikkel, J. (eds) Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09218-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09219-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)