Abstract
A well designed peer review process in higher education subjects can lead to more confident and reflective learners who become skilled at making independent judgements of their own and others’ work; essential requirements for successful lifelong learning. The challenge for educators is to ensure their students gain these important graduate attributes within the constraints of a range of internal and external tensions currently facing higher education systems, including, respectively, the realities of large undergraduate Accounting subjects, culturally diverse and time-poor academics and students, and increased calls for public accountability of the Higher Education sector by groups such as the OECD. Innovative curriculum and assessment design and collaborative technologies have the capacity to simultaneously provide some measure of relief from these internal and external tensions and to position students as responsible partners in their own learning.
This chapter reports on a two phase implementation of an online peer review process as part of the assessment in a large, under-graduate, International Accounting class. Phase One did not include explicit reflective strategies within the process, and anonymous and voluntary student views served to clearly highlight that students were ‘confused’ and ‘hesitant’ about moving away from their own ideas; often mistrusting the conflicting advice received from multiple peer reviewers. A significant number of students also felt that they did not have the skills to constructively review the work of their peers. Phase Two consequently utilised the combined power of e-Technology, peer review feedback and carefully scaffolded and supported reflective practices from Ryan and Ryan’s Teaching and Assessing Reflective Learning (TARL) model (see Chap. 2). Students found the reflective skills support workshop introduced in Phase Two to be highly useful in maximising the benefits of the peer review process, with 83 % reporting it supported them in writing peer reviews, while 90 % of the respondents reporting the workshop supported them in utilising peer and staff feedback.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: theories and practicalities. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 34(3), 243–257.
Angelo, T. (1996). Transforming assessment: High standards for higher learning. AAHE Bulletin, April, 3–4.
Australian Government (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education: Discussion Paper. June, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Canberra.
Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton: Post Pressed.
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Berkshire: Open UniversityPress.
Ecclestone, K. (2001). I know a 2:I when I see it: understanding criteria for degree classification in franchised university programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25, 301–313.
Huijser, H., Kimmins, L., & Evans, P. (2008). Peer-assisted learning in fleximode: Developing an online learning community. Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 1, 51–60.
Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 241–257.
Mansell, W., James, M., & The Assessment Reform Group (2009). Assessment in schools. Fit for purpose? A Commentary by the teaching and learning research programme. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
Mezirow, J. (2006). An overview of transformative learning. In P. Sutherland & J. Crowther (Eds.), Lifelong learning. London: Routledge.
Mulder, R. A., & Pearce, J. M. (2007). PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore, 2007, 727–736.
O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 325–335.
Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains ‘untold’. Educational Research, 47(1), 25–44.
Pearce, J., Mulder, R., & Bail, C. (2010). “Involving students in peer review: Case studies and practical strategies for university teaching”, On-line Peer Review Guide, PRAZE website, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/. Accessed 15 Aug 2011.
Race, P. (2003). Why fix assessment? In L. Cooke & P. Smith (Eds), Seminar: reflections on learning and teaching in higher education. Buckinghamshire: Chilterns University College.
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.
Rust, C. (2007). Towards a scholarship of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 229–237.
Rust, C. (2009). Engaging students with assessment and feedback. Workshop, QUT, Monday, 30th November. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 147–164.
Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231–240.
Ryan, M. (2010). Improving reflective writing in higher education: A social semiotic perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 99–111.
Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2012a). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.661704.
Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2012b). Developing a systematic, cross-faculty approach to teaching and assessing reflection in higher education, Final Report 2012, Queensland University of Technology, for the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.
Taylor, S. (2011) Helping Undergraduate Students Across Disciplines and Cultures Actively Engage and Collaborate as Equal Members of a Community of Scholars: Peer Review within an E-Learning Environment. In ICERI 2011 Proceedings CD, International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED), Madrid, pp. 2609–2619.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) and the International Institute for Educational Planning (2006). Governance in Education: Transparency and Accountability. International Institute for Educational Planning: Paris.
Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, S., Ryan, M. (2015). Teaching Peer Review Reflective Processes in Accounting. In: Ryan, M. (eds) Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09271-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09271-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09270-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09271-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)