Skip to main content

New Approaches to Surface Cleaning of Unvarnished Contemporary Oil Paintings – Moist Sponges and Cloths

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint

Abstract

The properties and cleaning efficacy of five different sponges and two microfibre moistened cloths were studied on both naturally and artificially aged and soiled oil paint surfaces. The cleaning efficacy of the materials were compared to that of conventional cotton swab cleaning with water and saliva. All materials tested showed good performance in terms of cleaning compared to swab rolling with water or saliva. The tested moist isoprene make up sponge performed best of all materials on the artificeally aged and soiled surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Verbal communication with colleagues and conservators participating in the Dry Cleaning Workshops of January and June 2010, Instituut Collectie Nederland, Hobbemastraat 22, Amsterdam.

  2. 2.

    http://www.cultureelerfgoed.nl/sites/default/files/documenten/drycleaning%20table.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Hema is a department store and Etos is a drugstore. Both are chain stores in the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. There are new sponges on the market. ALthough most claim to be PU sponges testing is needed to determine any additives present.

  4. 4.

    By Polly Saltmarsh in 2008.

  5. 5.

    At the former ICN, Gabriël Metsustraat 8. Light microscopy and SEM showed that the dirt was mainly particulate inorganic matter conaining silica, calcium, sulphur and aluminium, indicating that much of the dust was related to cement and building material.

References

  • Daudin-Schotte M, Bisschoff M, Joosten I, van Keulen H, van den berg KJ (2011) Dry cleaning approaches for unvarnished paint surfaces, Post prints cleaning 2010. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Green T (1990) Surface dirt removal from unvarnished paint films. In: Hackney S, Townsend J, Eastaugh (eds) Dirt and pictures separated. The United Kingdom Institute of Conservation, London, pp 51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackney S (2010) The art and science of cleaning paintings. In: Laura F-L, Elena Charola A, Marion M, Teresa Doménech-Carbó M (eds) Cleaning 2010 new insights into the cleaning of paintings. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valência, pp 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills L et al (2008) Water sensitivity of modern artists’ oil paints. ICOM preprints of the 15th triennial meeting New Delhi, 22–26 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison R, Bagley-Young A, Burnstock A, van den Berg K, van Keulen H (2007) An investigation of parameters for the use of citrate solutions for surface cleaning unvarnished paintings. Stud Conserv 52:255–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nazaroff W, Ligocki M, Ma T, Cass G (1990) Particledeposition in musuems:comparison of modeling and measurments results. Aerosol Sci Tech 13:332–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen H, Kornum L, Säberg O (1978) Dirt retention on painted surfaces. J Coat Technol

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby B, Phenix A (2010) Artificial dirt recipe

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry R (1990) Problems of dirt accumulation and its removal from unvarnished paintings: a practical review. In: Hackney S, Townsend T, Eastaugh N. United Kingdom Institue for Conservation of historic and Artistic Works, London, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Phenix A, Burnstock A (1990) The deposition of dirt: a review of the literature, with scanning electron microscope studies of dirt on selected paintings. In: Hackney S, Townsend J, Eastaugh N (eds) Dirt and pictures separated. The United Kingdom Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbers R (2000) Cleaning painted surfaces aqueous methods. Archtype Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Beatriz Veríssimo Mendes or Klaas Jan van den Berg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veríssimo Mendes, B., van den Berg, K.J., Megens, L., Joosten, I., Daudin, M. (2014). New Approaches to Surface Cleaning of Unvarnished Contemporary Oil Paintings – Moist Sponges and Cloths. In: van den Berg, K., et al. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10100-2_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics