Skip to main content

Fusing Quantifiers and Connectives: Is Intuitionistic Logic Different?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 7))

  • 843 Accesses

Abstract

A paper by Dag Westerståhl and myself twenty years ago introduced operators that are both connectives and quantifiers. We introduced two binary operators that are classically interdefinable: one that fuses conjunction and existential quantification and one that fuses implication and universal quantification. We called the system PFO. A complete Gentzen-Prawitz style Natural Deduction axiomatization of classical PL was provided. For intuitionistic PL, however, it seemed that existential quantification should be fused with disjunction rather than with conjunction. Whether this was true, and if so why, were questions not answered at the time. Also, it seemed that there is no uniform definition of such a disjunctive-existential operator in classical PFO. This, too, remained a conjecture. In this paper, I return to these previously unresolved questions, and resolve them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This problem was introduced into the modern literature by Geach (1962).

  2. 2.

    It also turned out to be straightforward to extend the system to treating sub-sentential expression in a flexibly binding version of Montague Grammar. All that was needed was to subject the \(\lambda \) operator to the same binding principles. See Pagin and Westerståhl (1994).

  3. 3.

    The following observations are added in the present paper.

References

  • Geach, P. T. (1962). Reference and generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 39–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagin, P., & WesterstÃ¥hl, D. (1993). Predicate logic with flexibly binding operators and natural language semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2, 89–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagin, P & WesterstÃ¥hl, D. (1994). Flexible variable-binding and Montague grammar. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth Amsterdam Colloquium(pp. 519–525)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural deduction. A proof-theoretic study. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International. Republished by Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Pagin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pagin, P. (2015). Fusing Quantifiers and Connectives: Is Intuitionistic Logic Different? . In: Wansing, H. (eds) Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11041-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics