Skip to main content

Flexibly-Bounded Rationality in Interstate Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Rational Decision Making

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

This chapter applies the theory of flexibly bounded rationality to interstate conflict. Flexibly bounded rationality is a theory that states that the bounds prescribed by Herbert Simon in his theory of bounded rationality are flexible. On contextualizing the theory of flexibly bounded rationality, inference, the theory of rational expectation, the theory of rational choice and the theory of rational conterfactuals are described. The theory of flexibly bounded rationality is applied for decision making process. This is done by using a multi-layer perceptron network and particle swarm optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdella M, Marwala T (2006) The use of genetic algorithms and neural networks to approximate missing data in database. Comput Inform 24:1001–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams RM (1976) Motive utilitarianism. J Philos 73(14):467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed EA (2014) Bayesian estimation based on progressive type-II censoring from two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime model: an Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. J Appl Statist 41(4):752–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allingham M (2002) Choice theory: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anand P (1993) Foundations of rational choice under risk. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin D, Smith CH (1983) Inductive inference: theory and methods. Comput Surv 15(3):237–269

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2010) Correlates of war project. http://www.correlatesofwar.org/. Accessed 20 Sep 2010

  • Anscombe GEM (1958) Modern moral philosophy. Philos 33(124):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviad B, Roy G (2012) A decision support method, based on bounded rationality concepts, to reveal feature saliency in clustering problems. J Decis Support Syst 54(1):292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham J (2009) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (Dover Philosophical Classics). Dover Publications Inc. Mineola, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO (1980) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri C (1993) Rationality and coordination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume LE, Easley D (2008) Rationality. The new palgrave dictionary of economics 2nd edn. Abstract, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Choi J, Weiss BA, Stapleton L (2014) An empirical evaluation of mediation effect analysis with manifest and latent variables using Markov Chain Monte Carlo and alternative estimation methods. Struct Equ Model 21(2):253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot M (1970) Optimal statistical decision. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR, Kokko H (2009) The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour. Proc Biol Sci 276(1654):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gama J (2013) Data stream mining: the bounded rationality. Informatica 37(1):21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • GarÅ¡va G, Danenas P (2014) Particle swarm optimization for linear support vector machines based classifier selection. Nonlinear Anal Model Control 19(1):26–42

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grüne-Yanoff T (2012) Paradoxes of rational choice theory. In: Roeser S, Hillerbrand R, Sandin P, Peterson M (eds) Handbook of risk theory. Springer Netherlands, pp 499–516, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_19

    Google Scholar 

  • Günay M, Åžarer B, Kasap H (2014) The effect on radiation damage of structural material in a hybrid system by using a Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Ann Nucl Energy 63:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlalele N, Nelwamondo FV, Marwala T (2009) Imputation of missing data using PCA, neurofuzzy and genetic algorithms. 15th International Conference, ICONIP 2008, part 4, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5507, pp 485–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen MCW (1993) Microfoundations: a critical inquiry. Routledge, London. International library of critical writings in economics, vol. 19. Aldershot, Hants, Elgar. pp 3-23. ISBN 978-1-85278-572–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey RC (ed) (1979) Studies in inductive logic and probability. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R, Curotto E, Mella M (2013) Replica exchange with smart Monte Carlo and hybrid Monte Carlo in manifolds. Chem Phys Lett 590:214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Xie J, Wang N, Li J (2013) Evolution game analysis of water saving and pollution prevention for city user groups based on bounded rationality. Shuili Fadian Xuebao/J Hydroelectr Eng 32(1):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin C, Jin S-W, Tan H-Y (2013) Computer virus propagation model based on bounded rationality evolutionary game theory. Secur Commun Netw 6(2):210–218

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks IV. pp 1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kim G-H, Lee D (2014) Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo model for determining optimum tender price in multifamily housing projects. J Comput Civ Eng 28(3), (art. no. 06014001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagazio M, Marwala T (2005) Assessing different Bayesian neural network models for militarized interstate dispute. Soc Sci Comput Rev 24(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle DE (2006) The wider impact of Moore’s Law. Solid State Circuits Soc Newsl 11(5):28–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Ding G, Wang B (2014) Bare-bones particle swarm optimization with disruption operator. Appl Math Comput 238:106–122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lodhia HC (2005) The irrationality of rational expectations-an exploration into economic fallacy, 1st edn. Warwick University Press, Coventry

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay D (1991) Bayesian methods for adaptive models. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay DJC (1992) Bayesian methods for adaptive models. PhD thesis, 2nd edn California University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay DJC (2003) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 0-521-64298–64291

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marais E (2009) The soul of the white ant, 1937. First published as Die Siel van die Mier in 1925, the Philovox

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwala T (2006) Genetic approach to Bayesian training of neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, BC, Canada, pp 7013–7017

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwala T (2009) Computational intelligence for missing data imputation, estimation and management: knowledge optimization techniques. IGI Global, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marwala T (2013) Flexibly-bounded rationality and marginalization of irrationality theories for decision making. arXiv:1306.2025

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwala T (2014) Causality, correlation and artificial intelligence for rational decision making. World Scientific, Singapore (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwala T, Lagazio M (2011) Militarized conflict modeling using computational intelligence techniques. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (2011) A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive (Classic Reprint). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistry J, Nelwamondo FV, Marwala T (2006) Investigating demographic influences for HIV classification using Bayesian autoassociative neural networks. Lecture notes in computer science vol. 5507, pp 752–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GE (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8):114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mthembu L, Marwala T, Friswell MI, Adhikari S (2010) Finite element model selection using particle swarm optimization Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, 1, vol 13, Dynamics of Civil Structures, vol 4, Springer London, pp 41-52 Tom Proulx (ed), 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata A, Kubo S, Hata N (2012) Study on promotion of cooperative behavior in social dilemma situation by introduction of bounded rationality-Effects of group heuristics on cooperative behavior. Proceedings of the SICE annual conference, (art. no. 6318444), pp 261–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth JF (1961) Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29(3):315-335. doi:10.2307/1909635. Reprinted In: Hoover KD, (ed) (1992) The new classical macroeconomics, vol. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal RM (1992) Bayesian training of back-propagation networks by the hybrid Monte Carlo Method. Technical Report CRG-TR −92-1, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelwamondo FV, Marwala T (2007) Handling missing data from heteroskedastic and nonstationary data. Lecture notes in computer science vol 4491(1). Springer, Berlin, pp 1297–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (1993) The nature of rationality. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke P, Josephson J (eds) (1997) Automated abduction: inference to the best explanation. AAAI Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma G, Bia P, Mescia L, Yano T, Nazabal V, Taguchi J, Moréac A, Prudenzano F (2014) Design of fiber coupled Er3+ :chalcogenide microsphere amplifier via particle swarm optimization algorithm. Opt Eng 53(7), (art. no. 071805), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantanowitz A, Marwala T (2009) Evaluating the impact of missing data imputation. Advanced data mining and application 5th international conference, ADMA 2009, Lecture notes in computer science vol. 5678. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 577–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel P, Marwala T (2006) Neural networks, fuzzy inference systems and adaptive-neuro fuzzy inference systems for financial decision making. 13th international conference, ICONIP, Neural information processing, Lecture notes in computer science vol. 4234. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 430–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos S (2009) An explorer upon untrodden ground: peirce on abduction. In: Gabbay DM, Hartmann S, Woods J (eds) Handbook of the history of logic 10. Elsevier. pp 117–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell SJ, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi J, Sadeghi S, Niaki STA (2014) Optimizing a hybrid vendor-managed inventory and transportation problem with fuzzy demand: an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Inf Sci 272:126–144

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent TJ (1987) Rational expectations. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn, vol. 4. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin NE (1987) Rational expectations: econometric implications. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn, vol. 4. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2008) Rational behavior. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn, vol. 4. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1957) A behavioral model of rational choice. In: Models of man, social and rational: mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon B, Vane H, Wynarczyk P (1994) A modern guide to macroeconomics. An introduction to competing schools of thought. Cambridge, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp 236–279, ISBN: 1-85278-884-4 HB

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn W (2002) The many facets of the theory of rationality. Croat J Philos 2(3):247–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanciu-Viziteu LD (2012) The shark game: equilibrium with bounded rationality. Managing market complexity. The approach of artificial economics. Lecture notes in economics mathematical systems, vol. 662. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaishi T (2014) Bayesian estimation of realized stochastic volatility model by hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm. J Phys Conf Ser 490(1), (art. no. 012092), arXiv:1408.0981

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C (1996) Bounded rationality and economic evolution: a contribution to decision making, economics, and management. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang EPK (2008) Computational intelligence determines effective rationality. Intl J Autom Control 5(1):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez F, Melin P, Castillo O (2014) Modular neural networks architecture optimization with a new nature inspired method using a fuzzy combination of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms. Inf Sci 270:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyse SA (2000) Believing in magic: the psychology of superstition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Widom M, Huhn WP, Maiti S, Steurer W (2014) Hybrid Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics simulation of a refractory metal high entropy alloy. Metall Mater Trans 45(1):196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J, Li D (2013) Bounded rationality as a source of loss aversion and optimism: a study of psychological adaptation under incomplete information. J Econ Dyn Control 37(1):18–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tshilidzi Marwala .

Conclusions

Conclusions

This chapter applied the theory of flexibly bounded rationality to interstate conflict . Flexibly bounded rationality is a theory that observes that given the fact that missing information can be estimated to a certain extent, decision making processing power can be increased due to Moore’s Law and that decision making can be be enhanced using artificial intelligence methods, then the bounds of bounded rationality theory are flexible. This theory was successfully applied to the problem of interstate conflict.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marwala, T. (2014). Flexibly-Bounded Rationality in Interstate Conflict. In: Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Rational Decision Making. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11424-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11424-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11423-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11424-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics