Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health Impact Assessment: HIA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Systematic Review of Key Issues in Public Health

  • 1884 Accesses

Abstract

Health impact assessment (HIA) is a combination of procedures, methods and tools used in order to evaluate the potential effects of a policy or project on the health of a population. HIA, therefore, is a multidisciplinary and comprehensive governance tool used by decision-makers in order to build a healthy public policy and reduce health inequalities .

According to the moment in which the HIA is conducted, it is possible to identify three main models of HIA: prospective, concurrent and retrospective (before, during and after a policy is implemented). Alternatively, according to costs, resources, methodology and duration, a Mini, Standard or Maxi HIA can be defined.

HIA process includes five main steps: screening (determine whether an HIA is valuable and feasible), scoping (define what to do and how to do), appraisal (identify health hazards and consider evidence of impact), reporting (synthesize and communicate findings; develop recommendations) and monitoring (verify whether the HIA has influenced the decision-making process). All stakeholders take part in an HIA process.

In terms of effectiveness, it must be evaluated if HIA has contributed to a modification in the pending decision, and in terms of costs, there is no standard cost for conducting one HIA; nevertheless, costs can be estimated by dedicated calculators.

HIA encourages public participation in public policy issues and strategic planning and in a socioeconomic context of crisis and limited resources may maximize beneficial effects and minimize any harmful effect on health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Centre for Health Policy-WHO Regional Office for Europe (1999) Health Impact Assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quigley R, den Broeder L, Furu P et al (2006) Health Impact Assessment International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series Number 5, International Association for Impact Assessment: Fargo USA. http://iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/SP5.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kemm J (2008) Health impact assessment: an aid to political decision-making. Scand J Public Health 36(8):785–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stahl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K (2006) Health in all policies: prospects and potentials. Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO (2010) Why use HIA? Values. http://www.who.int/hia/about/why/en/index.html. Accessed 21 May 2013

  6. WHO (2010) Glossary of terms used. http://www.who.int/hia/about/glos/en/index.html. Accessed 21 May 2013

  7. Taylor L, Gorman N, Quigley R (2003) Evaluating health impact assessment: learning from practice bulletin. Health Development Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kemm J (ed) (2012). Health Impact Assessment: Past Achievement, Current Understanding, and Future Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Furber SE, Gray E, Harris-Roxas BF et al (2007) Rapid versus intermediate health impact assessment of foreshore development plans. NSW Public Health Bull 18(10):174–176. doi:10.1071/NB07076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chilaka MA (2010) Vital statistics relating to the practice of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in the United Kingdom. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30(2):116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. WHO (2010). Health Impact Assessment (HIA) tools and methods. http://www.who.int/hia/tools/en/. Accessed 21 May 2013

  12. Cole BL, Shimkhada R, Fielding JE, Kominski G, Morgenstern H (2005) Methodologies for realizing the potential of health impact assessment. Am J Prev Med 28(4):382–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhatia R (2010) A guide for health impact assessment. CDPH 10:17–20. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/pubsforms/Guidelines/Documents/HIA%20Guide%20FINAL%2010-19-10.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhatia R (2011) Health impact assessment: a guide for practice. Human Impact Partners, Oakland. http://www.humanimpact.org/component/jdownloads/finish/11/139/0. Accessed 5 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. SFPHES. http://www.sfphes.org/publications/HIA_Guide_for_Practice.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013

  16. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2007) The effectiveness of health impact assessment: scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. The Cromwell Press, Trowbridge. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/98283/E90794.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  17. Veerman JL, Barendregt JJ, Mackenbach JP (2005) Quantitative health impact assessment: current practice and future directions. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:361–370

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobson E, DeCoursey WJ, Rosenberg N (2011) The Health-Impact Assessment (HIA): a useful tool. Published as a supplement to Healthy Communities: a resource guide for Delaware municipalities, 2011. http://www.ipa.udel.edu/healthydetoolkit/docs/HIA_Web.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013

  19. Human Impact Organization FAQ. http://www.humanimpact.org/faq#howmuch. Accessed 6 June 2013

  20. Scott-Samuel A, Birley M, Ardern K (2001) The Merseyside guidelines for Health Impact Assessment, 2nd edn. IHIA Consortium, Liverpool. http://www.liv.ac.uk/ihia/IMPACT%20Reports/2001_merseyside_guidelines_31.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brodin H, Hodge S (2008) A guide to quantitative methods in Health Impact Assessment. Swedish National Institute of Public Health. http://www†.fhi.se/PageFiles†/6057/R2008-41-Quantitative-Methods-in-HIA.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatia R (2010) A guide for Health Impact Assessment. CDPH 10:40–41. http://www.cdph. ca.gov/pubsforms/Guidelines/Documents/HIA%20Guide%20FINAL%2010-19-10.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  23. United States Environmental Protection Agency–USEPA–(2000) Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/economic_research_unit/documents/ Section%202001%20ISOR%205%20EPA%20Guidelines%20for%20Preparing%20Economic% 20Analysis%20EE-0228C-07.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connell E, Hurley F (2009) A review of the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative methods used in health impact assessment. Public Health 123(4):306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Health Canada. EA within a Canadian context. In: Canadian handbook on health impact assessment. Ottawa: Health Canada, 1999:4-1–4-4. Available at: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/ Collection/H46-2-99-235E-1.pd

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stockholm County Council, Landstingsforbundet (2004). Examples of how to start up and implement health impact assessments (HIA). Stockholm County Council, Southwestern Health District. www.lf.svekom.se/artikel.asp%3FC=900%26A=1327. Accessed 9 June 2013

  27. Fehr R (1999) Environmental health impact assessmentevaluation of a ten-step model. Epidemiology 10:618–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Environmental Health Council (2000) Health Impact Assessment Implementation Guidelines, Consultation Draft 2000, Department for Health and Aged Care, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/strateg/envhlth/hia/. Accessed 7 June 2013

  29. Kjellstrom T, Hill S (2002) New Zealand evidence for health impacts of transport. A background paper prepared for the Public Health Advisory Committee. New Zealand National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability. http://nhc.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/health-impact-transport-phac.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  30. Acheson D (1998) Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report. Department of Health, England Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Heaton SK, Feldman JD, Rutt CD (2008) Use of health impact assessment in the U.S.: 27 case studies, 1999–2007. Am J Prev Med 34(3):241–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Health Impact Assessment Clearinghouse Learning and Information Center (2010). Completed HIAs. University of California, Los Angeles. http://www†.hiaguide.org/hias. Accessed 8 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts (2011) Health Impact Project 2011. http://www.healthimpactproject.org/. Accessed 8 June 2013

  34. Harris-Roxas B, Harris E (2011) Differing forms, differing purposes: a typology of health impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(4):396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. San Francisco Department of Public Health (2009) A health impact assessment of the healthy families act of 2009. Human Impact Partners, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  36. City of Pittsburg (2008) Railroad Avenue Specific Plan HIA. Human Impact Partners, 2008. http://www.hiaguide.org/sites/default/files/PittsburgRRAve.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo.go F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy

    Roberto Falvo

  2. Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia em Saúde, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, CEP 80215-901, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

    Marcia Regina Cubas

  3. Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark

    Gabriel Gulis

Authors
  1. Roberto Falvo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcia Regina Cubas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabriel Gulis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Falvo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Institute of Hygiene Faculty of Medicine, Rome, Italy

    Stefania Boccia

  2. Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Paolo Villari

  3. Institute of Hygiene,Faculty of Medicine Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

    Walter Ricciardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Falvo, R., Regina Cubas, M., Gulis, G. (2015). Health Impact Assessment: HIA. In: Boccia, S., Villari, P., Ricciardi, W. (eds) A Systematic Review of Key Issues in Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13620-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13620-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13619-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13620-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation