Skip to main content

Cui bono: Who Stands to Gain? Certification for Smallholder Tree-Farmers in Southeast Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Global Value Chains

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management in Transition ((NRMT,volume 2))

Abstract

The title of this chapter is “Cui bono: Who Stands to Gain?”. In the context of certification, the answer is “all participants in the value and supply chain”. However, currently not all do. If this outcome is to be achieved then a new approach within current systems is required, particularly for smallholder tree-farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data accessed at http://info.fsc.org/certificate.php#result and updated to July 2016.

  2. 2.

    Personal communication from a closely associated person to the authors.

  3. 3.

    For more details see https://au.fsc.org/en-au/newsroom/technical-news/id/318, last accessed 31 January 2019.

References

  • Auer MA (2012) Group Forest Certification for smallholders in Vietnam: an early test and future prospects. Hum Ecol 40(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beall E (ed) (2012) Smallholders in global bioenergy value chains and certification: evidence from three case studies. Environment and Natural Resources Management Working Paper 50. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2597e.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhojvaid PP (2009) Role of agroforests and small-scale production forestry in employment generation and environmental conservation. In: Leslie RN (ed) The future of forests in Asia and the Pacific: Outlook for 2020. RAP publication 2009/03. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, pp 235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulay A, Tacconi L, Kanowski P (2012) Drivers of adoption of eucalypt tree farming by smallholders in Thailand. Agrofor Syst 84(2):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen B (2015) Producer organizations and certification in Southeast Asia. In: Pasiecznik N, Savenjie H (eds) Effective Forest and Farm Producer Organizations. European Tropical Forest Research Network (ETFRN) News Issue 57, September 2015. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, pp 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramb R, McCarthy J (2016) Palm oil politics impede sustainability in Southeast Asia. https://theconversation.com/palm-oil-politics-impede-sustainability-in-southeast-asia-57647/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Ecolabel Index (2019) Ecolabel Index – The global directory of ecolabels. http://www.ecolabelindex.com/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Elson D, Unggul S (2015) How Indonesia’s best known forest cooperative lost its way. In: Pasiecznik N, Savenjie H (eds) Effective Forest and Farm Producer Organizations. European Tropical Forest Research Network (ETFRN) News Issue 57, September 2015. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, pp 206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans S, Nair L (2016) Introduction to the global rubber industry. International Rubber Study Group (IRSG) Focus Forum on Sustainability, Singapore 10–11 May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I, Chandrasekharan C (2005) Paths and pitfalls of decentralization for sustainable forest management: experiences of the Asia Pacific Region. In: Colfer CJP, Capistrano D (eds) The politics of decentralization: forests, power and people. Earthscan, London, pp 63–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan A, Laity R (2015) Over-regulated and under marketed: challenges in supporting feasible verification processes in Lao PDR. Discussion paper completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 “Enhancing Key Elements of the Value Chains for Plantation Grown Wood in Lao PDR”

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood CE, Nambiar EKS (2014) Sustainable plantation forestry in South-East Asia, Technical Report No 084. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles T (2011) Financial modelling and analysis of FSC certified rattan in Lao PDR. Final report prepared for the WWF Greater Mekong Lao Country Programme, October 2011. http://www.ecolarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/WWF-rattan-FSC-analysis-and-modelling-Lao-PDR-FINAL-Amended.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Kuit M, Waarts Y (2014) Small-scale farmers, certification schemes and private standards: is there a business case? Costs and benefits of certification and verification systems for small-scale producers in cocoa, coffee, cotton, fruit and vegetable sectors. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen. https://publications.cta.int/media/publications/downloads/1823_PDF.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Laity R, Flanagan A, Ho H, Nga H, Ho VC (2016) Leveraging sustainability with profitability: verification mechanisms for smallholder plantations in Vietnam. A contribution to ACIAR project FST/2008/039 “Enhancement of production of acacia and eucalyptus peeled and sliced veneer products in Vietnam and Australia”

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal P (2016) Holistic development of agroforestry plantations in India. In: Tewari S, Sha VK, Lavania SK (eds) Holistic development of agroforestry. Jaya Publishing House, Delhi, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschke M, Wilkings A (2014) Is certification a viable option for small producer fish farmers in the global south? Insights from Vietnam. Mar Policy 50(Part A):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Dörnberg J, Karmann M (2016) FSC certification solutions for smallholders and community managed forests. In: Pasiecznik N, Savenjie H (eds) Effective Forest and Farm Producer Organizations. European Tropical Forest Research Network (ETFRN) News Issue 57, September 2015. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, pp 164–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley SJ, Stevens PR, Flanagan AC, Ha TN (2016) The promise and reality of private-sector adoption of forest certification for smallholders in Vietnam, Thailand and Lao PDR. Commissioned report to the Program for Endorsement of Forest Certification, Second Draft, 19 October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Naturally:Wood (2010) Third Party Forest Certification in British Columbia. British Columbia Forest Facts, August 2010. http://www.sfiprogram.org/files/pdf/third-party-certification-aug-2010pdf/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Nguyen VQ, To XP, Nguyen TQ, Cao TC (2017) Linkage between woodworking companies and forest plantation households: upgrade value chain for wood industry. Forest Trends (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  • Northway S, Bull GQ (2007) Policy solutions to illegal logging: a forest sector model analysis. In: Leslie RN (ed) The future of forests in Asia and the Pacific: Outlook for 2020. RAP publication 2009/03. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, pp 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynton S (2015) Beyond Certification. Dō Sustainability, Oxford. http://www.scottpoynton.com/beyond-certification. Accessed 30 Aug 2019

  • Rietberg P, Slingerland M (2016) Barriers to smallholder RSPO certification: a science-for-policy paper by the SEnSOR programme. http://www.sensorproject.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Barriers-to-smallholder-RSPO-certification-Sep16_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Tamanaha BZ (2004) On the rule of law: history, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • TFT (2016) Luang Prabang update. Working beyond certification: Luang Prabang Teak Program FSC certificate will not be extended. http://www.tft-earth.org/stories/news/beyond-certification-luang-prabang/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • van Opijnen M, Brinkmann A, Meekers P (2013) Lessons learned on RSPO smallholder certification in Indonesia. CREM report no. C84. CREM BV, Amsterdam. https://crem.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1310_Report_lessons_learned_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest P, Unno A (2012) A new extraterritoriality? Aquaculture certification, sovereignty, and empire. Polit Geogr 31(6):358–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aidan C. Flanagan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Flanagan, A.C., Stevens, P.R., Midgley, S.J. (2019). Cui bono: Who Stands to Gain? Certification for Smallholder Tree-Farmers in Southeast Asia. In: Schmidt, M., Giovannucci, D., Palekhov, D., Hansmann, B. (eds) Sustainable Global Value Chains. Natural Resource Management in Transition, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14877-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14877-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14876-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14877-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics