Skip to main content

How Social Responsibility Influences Innovation of Service Firms: An Investigation of Mediating Factors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Exploring Services Science (IESS 2015)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to extend research on corporate social responsibility and to emphasise the role of this concept on innovation performance of service firms using mediators such as customer collaboration, employee collaboration, and business partners’ collaboration. This will help identifying the opportunities to improve the innovation capacity of firms. The results indicate that collaboration relationships played a partially mediating role. It acts as significant intermediate variables between social responsibility and innovation performance of service firms. The findings fill a gap in the literature by demonstrating how social responsibility initiatives influence the collaboration mechanisms of the firms through its positive effects on the collaboration between customers, employees, and business partners. They could also lead to the increase of their innovation potential. The managers of the firms using limited resources can stimulate indirectly the innovation by stimulating social responsibility initiatives because these have a multiplicative role in increasing the service firms’ innovation potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A.: What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J. Manag. 38(4), 932–968 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.: Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. J. Manag. 37(5), 1480–1495 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg. Manag. J. 21, 603–608 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.: Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(1), 17–40 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, G.G., Oppenheimer, R.J., Bastien, A.: Trust deterioration in an international buyer-supplier relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 36(1/2), 65–78 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., Barney, J.B.: Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 817–835 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, D., Friesen, P.H.: Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg. Manag. J. 4(3), 221–235 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron, D.: Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. J. Econ. Manag. Strateg. 10(1), 7–45 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B.: Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Mark. 70(4), 1–18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Melton, H.L., Hartline, D.M.: Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. J. Serv. Res. 13(4), 411–425 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Demirel, P., Mazzucato, M.: Innovation and firm growth: is R&D worth it? Ind. Innov. 19(1), 45–62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Godfrey, P.C.: The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30(4), 777–798 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murtha, T.P., Lenway, S.A., Bagozzi, R.P.: Global mind-sets and cognitive shift in a complex multinational corporation. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(2), 97–114 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peloza, J.: Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. Calif. Manag. Rev. 48(2), 52–72 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharya, C.B., Sankar, S.: Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumer relationships with companies. J. Mark. 67(2), 76–88 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, M.T., Birkinshaw, J.: The innovation value chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(6), 121–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, S.P., Menor, L.J., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B.: A critical evaluation of the new service development process. In: Fitzsimmons, Fitzsimmons (ed.) New Service Development, pp. 1–32. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J., Gremler, D.D.: Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alam, I.: An exploratory investigation of user innovation in new service development. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(3), 250–261 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chesbrough, H.: Managing open innovation. Res. Technol. Manag. 47(1), 23–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vargo, S.L., Lush, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68(1), 1–17 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Urban, G.L., John, R.H., William, J.Q., Bruce, D.W., Jonathan, D.B., Roberta, A.C.: Information acceleration: validation and lessons from the field. J. Mark. Res. 34(1), 143–153 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Agarwal, S., Erramilli, M.K., Dev, C.S.: Market orientation and performance in service firms: Role of innovation. J. Serv. Mark. 17(1), 68–82 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaiser, H.F.: An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1), 31–36 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B., Hansen, M.J.: The relationship between corporation social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strateg. Manag. J. 30(4), 425–445 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dakhli, M., De Clercq, D.: Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepreneurship Reg. Dev. 16(2), 107–128 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B.: Does doing good always lead to doing better? consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 38(2), 225–244 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook, J., Wall, T.: New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. J. Occup. Psychol. 53, 39–52 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S.: Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(2), 242–266 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Turban, D.B., Greening, D.W.: Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Manag. J. 40(3), 658–672 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rothaermel, F.T.: Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(6), 687–699 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moran, P.: Structural versus relational embeddedness: social capital and management performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 26(12), 1129–1151 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D.: Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(1), 273–292 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. De Luca, L., Atuahene-Gima, K.: Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance. J. Mark. 71(1), 95–112 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., Zeithaml, V.A.: Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J. Retail. 67(4), 420–450 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tuli, K.R., Ajay, K.K., Sundar, G.B.: Rethinking customer solutions: from product bundles to relational processes. J. Mark. 71(3), 1–17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hurley, R.F., Hult, G.T.M.: Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J. Mark. 62(3), 42–54 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Garcia-Morales, V.J., Llorens-Montes, F.J., Verdu-Jover, A.J.: The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. Br. J. Manag. 19(4), 299–319 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, T.J., Dacin, P.A.: The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J. Mark. 61(1), 68–84 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gruner, K.E., Homburg, C.: Does customer interaction enhance new product success? J. Bus. Res. 49(1), 1–14 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A.: Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. J. Serv. Res. 14(1), 3–23 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li, T., Calantone, R.J.: The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. J. Mark. 62(4), 13–29 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bryant, S.E.: The role of transformational and transactional leadership in creating, sharing and exploiting organizational knowledge. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 9(4), 32–44 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hair Jr., J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., Page, M.: Research Methods for Business. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Holmbeck, G.N.: Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and paediatric psychology literatures. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 65(4), 599–610 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411–423 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kelloway, E.K.: Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modelling: A Researcher’s Guide. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Bruton, G., Li, W.: Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41(3), 419–436 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M.: Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Barret, P.: Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Pers. Individ. Differ. 42(5), 815–824 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Drăgoicea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Militaru, G., Purcărea, AA., Borangiu, T., Drăgoicea, M., Negoiţă, O.D. (2015). How Social Responsibility Influences Innovation of Service Firms: An Investigation of Mediating Factors. In: Nóvoa, H., Drăgoicea, M. (eds) Exploring Services Science. IESS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14980-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14980-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14979-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14980-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics