Skip to main content

Fresh Produce Regulation and Private Standards in Turkey: Implications for Export Markets

  • Chapter
Food Safety, Market Organization, Trade and Development

Abstract

During the last several decades, increased concerns on food contaminants urged policy makers to take precautionary measures in order to protect domestic markets from imported foods with unwanted residues and additives, and ensure food safety. Given their potential importance to impede international trade, it is much debated whether the standards are imposed on health protection grounds or may be abused to serve as non-tariff trade barriers, especially against the exports of developing countries. Introduction of ISO 22000, besides public and private standards, may be considered as a strategic step towards solidification of diverse international food safety regulations on a voluntary basis for producers. ISO 22000 also stands as a rather less expensive and more attainable alternative for most smallholders of developing countries in agricultural production. Using a gravity model, this research aims to assess the effect of ISO 22000 diffusion on fresh produce exports by developing countries with a specific focus on the Turkish case. A panel dataset is constructed for 22 importing and 24 exporting countries over the period 2007–2011. Exporting countries are selected from the class of developing countries that has more than 10 % of their GDP value added from agricultural sector and on the basis of data availability. Within the exporting countries, there are major exporters of fresh produce as well as those that are listed at the bottom of the world exporters of fresh produce, but all countries are assumed to have a potential for agriculture since they have at least 10 % of their GDP from agricultural sector. Findings reveal that ISO 22000 certification in developing countries has a profound impact on their export performance of vegetables and fruits. Diffusion of ISO 22000 certification in developing countries tends to increase their exports of vegetables and fruits by 37 % and 53 %, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    HACCP stands for hazard analysis and critical points.

  2. 2.

    See Table 12.2 for more details on the data sources.

  3. 3.

    Exporting countries are Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Bosnia, China, Egypt, El Salvador, Fiji, Georgia, Ghana, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, and Uruguay. Importing countries are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States.

References

  • Alpay S, Yalçın I, Dölekoğlu T (2001) Avrupa Birliği Kalite ve Sağlık Standartlarının Türk Gıda Sanayi Sektörü Rekabet Gücü Üzerine Etkisi, Proje Raporu, Yayın No. 59, Nisan, 2001, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders S, Caswell JA (2009) Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts: assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on U.S. seafood imports. Am J Agric Econ 91(2):310–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind K (2001) The impacts of innovation and standards on trade of measurement and testing products: empirical results of Switzerland’s bilateral trade flows with Germany, France and the United Kingdom. Inf Econ Policy 13(4):439–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind K (2004) The economics of standards: theory, evidence, policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind K, Jungmittag A (2008) The impact of standards on macroeconomic growth: a panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors. J Prod Anal 29(1):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clougherty JA, Grajek M (2008) The impact of ISO9000 diffusion on trade and FDI: a new institutional analysis. J Int Bus Stud 39(4):613–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czubala W, Shepher B, Wilson JS (2009) Help or hindrance? The impact of harmonised standards on African exports. J Afr Econ 18(5):711–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Benedictis L, Taglioni D (2011) The gravity model in international trade. In: de Benedictis L, Salvatici L (eds) The trade impact of European Union preferential policies: an analysis through gravity models. Springer, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton J, Kortum SS (2002) Technology, geography and trade. Econometrica 70(5):1741–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2010) Agricultural statistics, farm structure. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/agriculture/introduction (accessed June 2013)

  • FAO (2003) Important commodities in agricultural trade: fruit and vegetables. Support to the WTO negotiations. Economic and Social Development Department. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4852e/y4852e13.htm (accessed September 2014)

  • Garcia Martinez M, Poole N (2004) The development of private fresh produce safety standards: implications for developing Mediterranean exporting countries. Food Policy 29(3):229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensel P (2009) Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) home page. University of North Texas, Denton, TX. http://www.paulhensel.org/icowcites.html

  • Henson S, Humphrey J (2010) Understanding the complexities of private standards in global agri-food chains as they impact developing countries. J Dev Stud 46(9):1628–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson SJ, Northen JR (1998) Economic determinants of food safety controls in the supply of retailer own-branded products in the UK. Agribusiness 14(2):113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson S, Masakure O, Cranfield J (2011) Do fresh produce exporters in sub-saharan Africa benefit from globalGAP certification? World Dev 39(3):375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs JE (2010) Public and private standards for food safety and quality: international trade implications. Estey J Int Law Trade Policy 11(1):136–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda K, Otsaki T, Wilson J (2015) Food safety standards and international trade: the impact on developing countries’ export performance. In: Hammoudi A, Grazia C, Surry Y, Traversac J-B (eds) Food safety, market organization, trade and development. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Koç AA, Aşçı S, Alpas S, Giray FH, Gay SH (2011) Food quality assurance schemes in Turkey. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. JRC European Commission, Seville, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland HE (1979) Quacks, lemons, and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. J Polit Econ 87(6):1328–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenius J (2004) Information versus product adaptation: the role of standards in trade. International Business and Markets Research Center Working Paper, Kellogg School of Management Working Paper, Northwestern University, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuki T, Wilson JS, Sewadeh M (2001) What price precaution? European harmonisation of afltoxin regulations and African groundnut exports. Eur Rev Agric Econ 28(2):263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T, Codron JM, Busch L, Bingen J, Harris C (1999) Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. Int Food Agribus Manage Rev 2(3/4):421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AK, van Wincoop E (2001) National money as a barrier to international trade: the real case for currency union. Am Econ Rev 91(2):386–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayın C, Mencet MN, Taşçıoğlu Y (2004) AvrupaBirliği’nde EUREPGAP Uygulamaları ve YaşMeyve ve SebzeTicaretimizeOlasıEtkileri, Türkiye IV. Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi, Tokat

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster M, Maertens M (2015) The impact of private food standards on trade and development: evidence from asparagus exports from Peru. In: Hammoudi A, Grazia C, Surry Y, Traversac J-B (eds) Food safety, market organization, trade and development. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd B (2010) Geographical diversification of developing country exports. World Dev 38(9):1217–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann GMP (2010) International standards and trade: a review of the empirical literature. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, No. 97. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann GMP, Temple P, Shurmer M (1996) Standards and trade performance: the British experience. Econ J 106:1297–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassey G (2000) Standardization in technology-based markets. Res Policy 29(4–5):587–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telllioğlu I (2011) Implications of food safety and quality standards: insights from Turkish tomato exports, Ph.D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy, suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • TUIK (2006) Agricultural enterprise structure survey. Turkish Statistical Institute. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed June 2013)

  • Wilson JS, Otsuki T (2003) Food safety and trade: winners and losers in a non-harmonized world. J Econ Integration 18(2):266–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JS, Otsuki T, Majumdar B (2003) Balancing food safety and risk: do drug residue limits affect international trade in beef? J Int Trade Econ Dev 12(4):377–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burçak Müge Tunaer Vural .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tunaer Vural, B.M., Akgüngör, S. (2015). Fresh Produce Regulation and Private Standards in Turkey: Implications for Export Markets. In: Hammoudi, A., Grazia, C., Surry, Y., Traversac, JB. (eds) Food Safety, Market Organization, Trade and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15227-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics