Skip to main content

Estimation of Torsional Compliance (Stiffness) from Free-Free FRF Measurements: eRCF Theory

  • Conference paper
Experimental Techniques, Rotating Machinery, and Acoustics, Volume 8

Abstract

The enhanced rotational compliance function (eRCF) is a useful concept for estimation of static torsional compliance/stiffness of a structure using measured frequency response functions (FRFs) from a structural system with free-free boundary conditions. The eRCF is estimated using FRF measurements involving impact testing in which a four by four (4x4) FRF matrix is acquired at four separate, symmetric locations on a structure. This is in contrast to a traditional, static torsion test that involves constraints applied to two of these four locations and a static torque applied to the other two of these four locations. The traditional, static torsion test requires extensive instrumentation and a two day test procedure while the eRCF method involves minimal instrumentation over several hours. Added masses can be utilized to acquire additional statistical data that estimates the same compliance (stiffness). The theoretical background is presented along with both modeling and experimental cases involving a rectangular plate structure

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Symbol:

Description

σ :

Standard deviation

\(\Delta \) :

Static deflection (in)

\(\Theta \) :

Angular deflection (rad)

f max :

Maximum frequency of the stiffness parameter estimation band (Hz)

f min :

Minimum frequency of the stiffness parameter estimation band (Hz)

L f :

Front spacing (in)

L r :

Rear spacing (in)

F :

Generalized force magnitude (lb f)

M :

Generalized moment magnitude (lb f in)

\(\left [\mathsf{H}(\omega )\right ]\) :

FRF matrix (\(\mathsf{\frac{X} {F} }\))

K T :

Static torsional stiffness (lb f in∕deg)

{V} :

Moment scaling vector

DOF 1:

Left front DOF, z direction

DOF 2:

Right front DOF, z direction

DOF 3:

Left rear DOF, z direction

DOF 4:

Right rear DOF, z direction

DOF 5:

Left mid-span DOF, z direction

DOF 6:

Right mid-span DOF, z direction

eRCF(ω):

Enhanced Rotational Compliance Function

eFRF(ω):

Enhanced Frequency Response Function

References

  1. Rediers B, Yang B, Juneja V (1998) Static and dynamic stiffness–one test, both results. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC) XVI–a conference and exposition on structural dynamics

    Google Scholar 

  2. Griffiths D, Aubert A, Green ER, Ding J (2003) A technique for relating vehicle structural modes to stiffness as determined in static determinate tests. SAE Technical Paper Series (2003-01-1716)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deleener J, Mas P, Cremers L, Poland J (2010) Extraction of static car body stiffness from dynamic measurements. SAE Technical Paper Series (2010-01-0228)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allemang RJ, Phillips AW (2012) Static stiffness from dynamic measurements. University of Cincinnati–Structural Dynamics Research Lab (UC-SDRL) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allemang RJ, Phillips AW (2012) Alternative methods for determining painted body stiffness. University of Cincinnati–Structural Dynamics Research Lab (UC-SDRL) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beer FP, Johnston Jr ER, DeWolf J, Mazurek D (2011) Mechanics of materials. McGraw Hill Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pasha HG (2014) Estimation of Static Stiffnesses from Free Boundary Dynamic (FRF) Measurements. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pasha HG, Allemang RJ, Brown DL, Phillips AW (2014) Static torsional stiffness from dynamic measurements using impedance modeling technique. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC) XXXII–a conference and exposition on structural dynamics

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pasha HG, Allemang RJ, Brown DL, Phillips AW, Kohli K (2014) Support systems for developing system models. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC) XXXII–a conference and exposition on structural dynamics

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pasha HG, Allemang RJ, Phillips AW (2014) Techniques for synthesizing frfs from analytical models. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC) XXXII–A conference and exposition on structural dynamics

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions and support from Helmut Schneeweiss and Luc Cremers of BMW AG, München, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pasha, H.G., Allemang, R.J., Phillips, A.W., Young, A., Poland, J. (2015). Estimation of Torsional Compliance (Stiffness) from Free-Free FRF Measurements: eRCF Theory. In: De Clerck, J. (eds) Experimental Techniques, Rotating Machinery, and Acoustics, Volume 8. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15236-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15236-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15235-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15236-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics