Skip to main content

Comparing Closed Loop Control Models and Mass-Spring-Damper Models for Human Structure Interaction Problems

  • Conference paper
Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2

Abstract

The interaction between human and structure can produce significant dynamic effects. This has been demonstrated in several occasions including the closing of the Millennium bridge in London shortly after being open to traffic. Models based on springs, dampers and lumped masses have been widely accepted by the scientific community to model the human in human-structure interaction (HSI) problems. Recently, models of the human body based on control theory have been proposed. This paper provides a comparison between two traditional models using spring, dampers and lumped masses and those using control theory. The models are updated in a probabilistic sense using Bayesian inference. The experimental data used for the comparison is obtained from a laboratory test structure specially designed for HSI studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agu E, Kaspersky M (2011) Influence of the random dynamic parameters of the human body on the dynamic characteristics of the coupled system of structure-crowd. J Sound Vib 330:431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto Y, Griffin M (2003) Mathematical models for the apparent masses of standings subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib 260:431–451

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Wei L, Griffin M (1998) Mathematical models for the apparent mass of the seated human body exposed to vertical vibration. J Sound Vib 212:855–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mansfield N, Griffin M (2000) Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. J Biomech 33:933–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sim L, Blackeborough A, Williams M (2007) Modelling of joint crowd structure system using equivalent reduced-dof system. Shock Vib 14:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sachse R, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2002) The influence of a group of humans on modal properties of a structure. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on structural dynamics, vol 2. Pitman, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ortiz-Lasprilla AR, Caicedo JM, Ospina GA (2014) Modeling human-structure interaction using a closed loop control system. In: Proceedings of the XXXII international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogata K (2002) Modern control engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zivanovic S, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2005) Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation: a literature review. J Sound Vib 279:1–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jone C, Reynolds P, Pavic A (2011) Vibration serviceability of stadia structures subjected to dynamic crowd loads: a literature review. J Sound Vib 330:1531–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Venuti F, Bruno L (2009) Crowd-structure interaction in lively footbridges under synchronous lateral excitation: a literature review. Phys Life Rev 6:176–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ingólfsson E, Georgakis C, Jönsson J (2012) Pedestrian-induced lateral vibrations of footbridges: a literature review. Eng Struct 45:21–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Medical Association (2013) Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association Inc., Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  14. Falati S (1999) The contribution of non-structural components to the overall dynamic behaviour of concrete floor slabs. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salyards K, Noss N (2013) Experimental results from a laboratory test program to examine human-structure interaction. In: Proceedings of the XXXII international modal analysis conference, Garden Grove, CA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Brownjohn J (1999) Energy dissipation in one-way slabs with human participation. In: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific vibration conference 99, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO (1981) Vibration and shock: mechanical driving point impedance of the human body. International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beck J, Katafygiotis LS (2009) Updating models and their uncertainties i: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech 124:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung SH, Beck J (2009) Bayesian model updating using hybrid monte carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with uncertain parameters. J Eng Mech 135:243–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brownjohn J (2005) Vibration serviceability of footbridges. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international modal analysis conference, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert C, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.CMMI-0846258

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert R. Ortiz-Lasprilla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ortiz-Lasprilla, A.R., Caicedo, J.M. (2015). Comparing Closed Loop Control Models and Mass-Spring-Damper Models for Human Structure Interaction Problems. In: Caicedo, J., Pakzad, S. (eds) Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15248-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15248-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15247-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15248-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics