Abstract
The interaction between human and structure can produce significant dynamic effects. This has been demonstrated in several occasions including the closing of the Millennium bridge in London shortly after being open to traffic. Models based on springs, dampers and lumped masses have been widely accepted by the scientific community to model the human in human-structure interaction (HSI) problems. Recently, models of the human body based on control theory have been proposed. This paper provides a comparison between two traditional models using spring, dampers and lumped masses and those using control theory. The models are updated in a probabilistic sense using Bayesian inference. The experimental data used for the comparison is obtained from a laboratory test structure specially designed for HSI studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agu E, Kaspersky M (2011) Influence of the random dynamic parameters of the human body on the dynamic characteristics of the coupled system of structure-crowd. J Sound Vib 330:431–444
Matsumoto Y, Griffin M (2003) Mathematical models for the apparent masses of standings subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib 260:431–451
Wei L, Griffin M (1998) Mathematical models for the apparent mass of the seated human body exposed to vertical vibration. J Sound Vib 212:855–874
Mansfield N, Griffin M (2000) Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. J Biomech 33:933–941
Sim L, Blackeborough A, Williams M (2007) Modelling of joint crowd structure system using equivalent reduced-dof system. Shock Vib 14:261–270
Sachse R, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2002) The influence of a group of humans on modal properties of a structure. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on structural dynamics, vol 2. Pitman, Munich
Ortiz-Lasprilla AR, Caicedo JM, Ospina GA (2014) Modeling human-structure interaction using a closed loop control system. In: Proceedings of the XXXII international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL
Ogata K (2002) Modern control engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Zivanovic S, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2005) Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation: a literature review. J Sound Vib 279:1–74
Jone C, Reynolds P, Pavic A (2011) Vibration serviceability of stadia structures subjected to dynamic crowd loads: a literature review. J Sound Vib 330:1531–1566
Venuti F, Bruno L (2009) Crowd-structure interaction in lively footbridges under synchronous lateral excitation: a literature review. Phys Life Rev 6:176–206
Ingólfsson E, Georgakis C, Jönsson J (2012) Pedestrian-induced lateral vibrations of footbridges: a literature review. Eng Struct 45:21–52
World Medical Association (2013) Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association Inc., Helsinki
Falati S (1999) The contribution of non-structural components to the overall dynamic behaviour of concrete floor slabs. University of Oxford, Oxford
Salyards K, Noss N (2013) Experimental results from a laboratory test program to examine human-structure interaction. In: Proceedings of the XXXII international modal analysis conference, Garden Grove, CA
Brownjohn J (1999) Energy dissipation in one-way slabs with human participation. In: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific vibration conference 99, Singapore
ISO (1981) Vibration and shock: mechanical driving point impedance of the human body. International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Beck J, Katafygiotis LS (2009) Updating models and their uncertainties i: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech 124:455–461
Cheung SH, Beck J (2009) Bayesian model updating using hybrid monte carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with uncertain parameters. J Eng Mech 135:243–225
Brownjohn J (2005) Vibration serviceability of footbridges. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international modal analysis conference, Springer
Robert C, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.CMMI-0846258
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ortiz-Lasprilla, A.R., Caicedo, J.M. (2015). Comparing Closed Loop Control Models and Mass-Spring-Damper Models for Human Structure Interaction Problems. In: Caicedo, J., Pakzad, S. (eds) Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15248-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15248-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15247-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15248-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)