Skip to main content

Scleral Lenses in the Management of Ocular Surface Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ocular Surface Disease

Abstract

Scleral devices can play a vital role in the treatment of ocular surface disease, both as an adjunct to traditional therapy and as an alternative when traditional therapies fail. With proper utilization, gas-permeable scleral lenses can promote healing of the ocular surface and improve debilitating symptoms related to severe dry eye syndrome secondary to conditions such as GVHD or Sjogren’s syndrome as well as persistent epithelial defects. Scleral lenses can also provide a safer alternative to surgery for patients with corneal irregularity who can no longer tolerate traditional gas-permeable corneal lenses. Scleral lenses and PROSE devices should be considered in all of these situations when traditional treatment modalities have failed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jacobs DS, Rosenthal P. Boston scleral lens prosthetic device for treatment of severe dry eye in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Cornea. 2007;26(10):1195–9. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318155743d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schornack MM, Baratz KH, Patel SV, Maguire LJ. Jupiter scleral lenses in the management of chronic graft versus host disease. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(6):302–5. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318188e205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers MED. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9(4):215–33. doi:10.1053/bbmt.2003.50026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin X, Cavanagh H. Ocular manifestations of graft-versus-host disease: 10 years’ experience. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1209–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Westeneng AC, Hettinga Y, Lokhorst H, Verdonck L, van Dorp S, Rothova A. Ocular graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Cornea. 2010;29(7):758–63. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca321c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Allan EJ, Flowers MED, Lin MP, Bensinger RE, Martin PJ, Wu MC. Visual acuity and anterior segment findings in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Cornea. 2011;30:1392–7. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820ce6d0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nassar A, Tabbara KF, Aljurf M. Ocular manifestations of graft-versus-host disease. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013;27(3):215–22. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schornack MM, Pyle J, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the management of ocular surface disease. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1398–405. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russo PA, Bouchard CS, Galasso JM. Extended-wear silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses in the management of moderate to severe dry eye signs and symptoms secondary to graft-versus-host disease. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(3):144–7. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000244154.76214.2d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inamoto Y, Sun Y-C, Flowers MED, et al. Bandage soft contact lenses for ocular graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(11):2002–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo S-E, Lee D-C, Chang M-H. The effect of low-dose doxycycline therapy in chronic meibomian gland dysfunction. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005;19:258–63. doi:10.3341/kjo.2005.19.4.258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foulks GN, Borchman D, Yappert MC, Kakar S. Topical azithromycin and oral doxycycline therapy of meibomian gland dysfunction: a comparative clinical and spectroscopic pilot study. Cornea. 2013;32(1):44–53. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318254205f.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Luchs J. Efficacy of topical azithromycin ophthalmic solution 1% in the treatment of posterior blepharitis. Adv Ther. 2008;25(9):858–70. doi:10.1007/s12325-008-0096-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schornack MM, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the management of keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36(1):39–44. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181c786a6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JC, Chiu GB, Bach D, Bababeygy SR, Irvine J, Heur M. Functional and visual improvement with prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem scleral lenses for irregular corneas. Cornea. 2013;32:1540–3. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a73802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLoss KS, Fatteh NH, Hood CT. Prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) scleral device compared to keratoplasty for the treatment of corneal ectasia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(5):974–982.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pecego M, Barnett M, Mannis MJ, Durbin-Johnson B. Jupiter scleral lenses: the UC Davis eye center experience. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(3):179–82. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31824daa5e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baran I, Bradley JA, Alipour F, Rosenthal P, Le HG, Jacobs DS. PROSE treatment of corneal ectasia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35(5):222–7. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katzman LR, Jeng BH. Management strategies for persistent epithelial defects of the cornea. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014;28(3):168–72. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciralsky JB, Chapman KO, Rosenblatt MI, et al. Treatment of refractory persistent corneal epithelial defects: a standardized approach using continuous wear PROSE therapy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2014;23(3):219–24. doi:10.3109/09273948.2014.894084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim P, Ridges R, Jacobs DS, Rosenthal P. Treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defect with overnight wear of a prosthetic device for the ocular surface. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(6):1095–101. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial Disclosures: None of the authors have any financial disclosures regarding the contents discussed in this manuscript. Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest with the contents discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Shorter OD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shorter, E., Butcko, V. (2018). Scleral Lenses in the Management of Ocular Surface Disease. In: Djalilian, A. (eds) Ocular Surface Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15823-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15823-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15822-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15823-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics