Skip to main content

A Proposal to Measure the Functional Efficiency of Futures Markets

  • Conference paper
Dynamics, Games and Science

Part of the book series: CIM Series in Mathematical Sciences ((CIMSMS,volume 1))

  • 828 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a method to measure the functional efficiency of futures markets in terms of social welfare using a standard futures market structural model. Employing the concept of social surplus, it can be shown that the error committed when using futures prices to estimate spot prices in the future results in a welfare loss caused by the erroneous allocation of resources. Therefore, the social welfare associated with the presence of futures markets can be measured using a social loss (SL) statistic and its components. The results confirm the consistency and robustness of the method. Finally, several practical uses for the SL statistic are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The crude oil price is that of West Texas Intermediate traded on the New York mercantile exchange.

  2. 2.

    Inefficient in the sense of the EMH.

  3. 3.

    r is the correlation between the price of the commodity relevant for the commercial firm and the price of the standardized commodity defined in the futures contract.

  4. 4.

    Futures prices collect the intertemporal allocation of resources for production and not for consumption, but welfare in the model does not vary significantly.

  5. 5.

    Note that these two variables are different from those that determine the quality of the hedging instrument in the basic model.

References

  1. Avsar, S.G., Goss, B.A.: Forecast errors and efficiency in the us electricity futures market. Aust. Econ. Pap. 40(4), 479–499 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baffes, J., Dennis, A.: Long-term drivers of food prices. Policy Research Working Paper, vol. 6455, pp. 1–35 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bond, G.E.: The effects of supply and interest rate shocks in commodity futures markets. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66(3), 294–301 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks, R.D.: A social loss approach to testing the efficiency of Australian financial futures. Monash University Department of Economics, Working Paper (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chari, V.V., Jagannathan, R.: The simple analytics of commodity futures markets: do they stabilize prices? Do they raise welfare? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Q. Rev. 14, 1–13 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chowdhury, A.R.: Futures market efficiency: evidence from cointegration tests. J. Futur. Mark. 11(5), 577–589 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Verdugo, J., Consuegra, M.: Estimating functional efficiency in energy futures markets. Econ. Bus. Lett. 2(3), 105–115 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong, B.G.: Speculation and market performance. Ph.D. thesis, Brown University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kawai, M.: Spot and futures prices of nonstorable commodities under rational expectations. Q. J. Econ. 98(2), 235–254 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawamoto, K., Hamori, S.: Market efficiency among futures with different maturities: evidence from the crude oil futures. J. Futur. Mark. 31(5), 487–501 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, M.S.: Forecasting accuracy of crude oil futures prices. International Monetary Fund Working Paper (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, C.W.: Forecasting efficiency of energy futures prices. J. Futur. Mark. 5, 393–419 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maslyuk, S., Smyth, R.: Cointegration between oil spot and futures prices of the same and different grades in the presence of structural change. Energy Policy 37, 1687–1693 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKenzie, A.M., Holt, M.T.: Market efficiency in agricultural futures markets. Appl. Econ. 34(12), 1519–1532 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pennings, J.M., Garcia, P.: Risk and hedging behavior: the role and determinants of latent heterogeneity. J. Financ. Res. XXXIII(4), 373–401 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peroni, E., McNown, R.: Noninformative and informative tests of efficiency in three energy futures markets. J. Futur. Mark. 18(8), 939–964 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pindick, R.S., Rotemberg, J.J.: The excess co-movement of commodity prices. NBER Working Paper Series, vol. 2671 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stein, J.: The simultaneous determination of spot and futures prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 51, 1012–1025 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stein, J.: Spot, forward and futures. Res. Financ. 1, 225–310 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stein, J.: Speculative price: Economic welfare and the idiot of chance. Rev. Econ. Stat. 63(2), 565–583 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stein, J.: The Economics of Futures Markets. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stein, J.: An evaluation of the performance of speculative markets. Commodity Futures Financ. Mark. 21, 153–178 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens, J.: Testing the efficiency of futures market for crude oil using weighted least squares. Appl. Econ. Lett. 20(18), 1611–1613 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Switzer, L.N., El-Khoury, M.: Extreme volatility, speculative efficiency, and the hedging effectiveness of the oil futures markets. J. Futur. Mark. 27, 61–84 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Timmermann, A., Granger, C.W.: Efficient market hypothesis and forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 20, 15–27 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Turnovsky, S.J.: The determinants of spot and futures prices with storable commodities. Econometrica 51, 1363–1387 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, H.H., Ke, B.: Efficiency tests of agricultural commodity futures markets in China. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 49, 125–141 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meliyara Consuegra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Consuegra, M., GarcĂ­a-Verdugo, J. (2015). A Proposal to Measure the Functional Efficiency of Futures Markets. In: Bourguignon, JP., Jeltsch, R., Pinto, A., Viana, M. (eds) Dynamics, Games and Science. CIM Series in Mathematical Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16118-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics