Abstract
A successful software project is the result of a complex process involving, above all, people. Developers are the key factors for the success of a software development process and the Agile philosophy is developer-centred. Developers are not merely executors of tasks, but actually the protagonists and core of the whole development process. This paper aims to investigate social aspects among developers working together and the appeal of a software project developed with the support of Agile tools such as Agile boards. We studied 14 open source software projects developed using the Agile board of the JIRA repository. We analysed all the comments committed by the developers involved in the projects and we studied whether the politeness of the comments affected the number of developers involved over the years and the time required to fix any given issue. Our results show that the level of politeness in the communication process among developers does have an effect on the time required to fix issues and, in the majority of the analysed projects, it has a positive correlation with attractiveness of the project to both active and potential developers. The more polite developers were, the less time it took to fix an issue, and, in the majority of the analysed cases, the more the developers wanted to be part of project, the more they were willing to continue working on the project over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sudhof, M., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., Potts., C.: A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. In: Proceedings of ACL (2013)
Gupta, S., Walker, M.A., Romano, D.M.: How rude are you?: Evaluating politeness and affect in interaction, pp. 203–217 (2007)
Korkala, M., Abrahamsson, P., Kyllonen, P.: A case study on the impact of customer communication on defects in agile software development. In: Agile Conference, 2006, p. 11. IEEE (2006)
Murgia, A., Concas, G., Tonelli, R., Ortu, M., Demeyer, S., Marchesi, M.: On the influence of maintenance activity types on the issue resolution time. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, pp. 12–21. ACM (2014)
Murgia, A., Tourani, P., Adams, B., Ortu, M.: Do developers feel emotions? an exploratory analysis of emotions in software artifacts. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 262–271. ACM (2014)
Novielli, N., Calefato, F., Lanubile, F.: Towards discovering the role of emotions in stack overflow. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering, pp. 33–36. ACM (2014)
Perry, T.: Drifting toward invisibility: The transition to the electronic task board. In: Agile Conference, AGILE 2008, pp. 496–500. IEEE (2008)
Pikkarainen, M., Haikara, J., Salo, O., Abrahamsson, P., Still, J.: The impact of agile practices on communication in software development. Empirical Software Engineering 13(3), 303–337 (2008)
Siegel, S.: Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (1956)
Tan S., Howard-Jones P.: Rude or polite: do personality and emotion in an artificial pedagogical agent affect task performance? In: 2014 Global Conference on Teaching and Learning with Technology (CTLT 2014) Conference Proceedings, p. 41 (2014)
Tsay, J., Dabbish, L., Herbsleb, J.: Lets talk about it: Evaluating contributions through discussion in: github. FSE. ACM (2014)
Weiss, C., Premraj, R., Zimmermann, T., Zeller, A.: How long will it take to fix this bug? In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, p. 1. IEEE Computer Society (2007)
Wilcoxon, F. Wilcox, R.A.: Some rapid approximate statistical procedures. Lederle Laboratories (1964)
Winschiers, H., Paterson, B.: Sustainable software development. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries, pp. 274–278. South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (2004)
Yamashita, K., McIntosh, S., Kamei, Y., Ubayashi, N.: Magnet or sticky? an oss project-by-project typology. In: MSR, pp. 344–347 (2014)
Zhang, H, Gong, L., Versteeg, S.: Predicting bug-fixing time: an empirical study of commercial software projects. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 1042–1051. IEEE Press (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ortu, M., Destefanis, G., Kassab, M., Counsell, S., Marchesi, M., Tonelli, R. (2015). Would you mind fixing this issue?. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18611-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18612-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)