Skip to main content

Effects of Small Group Discussion: Case Study of Community Disaster Risk Management in Japan

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN 2015)

Abstract

Community governance needs a small group discussion among community people to identify their concerns, to share them each other and to generate better alternatives for solving problems. A planner should manage the discussion to achieve these objectives. This study analyzed the small group discussion in the community disaster risk management by using text mining. Correspondence analysis was applied to the text data of the discussion. Analytical results revealed the characteristics and effects of small group discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bowles, S., Gintis, H.: Social capital and community governance. Econ. J. 112(483), 419–436 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan: Disaster Management in Japan. http://www.bousai.go.jp/1info/pdf/saigaipanf_e.pdf (2011)

  3. Chosokabe, M., Takeyoshi, H., Sakakibara, H.: Study on temporal change of social context: in the case of bicycle riding issue in Japan. In: GDN Proceedings, LNBIP, vol. 180, pp. 315–322 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, M., Stewart, J.: The local authority and the new community governance. Reg. Stud. 28(2), 201–219 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, M., Stewart, J.: Handling the wicked issues: a challenge for government. Discussion paper, Birmingham, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenacre, M., Blasius, J.: Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. Academic Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ishikawa, S., Maeda, T., Yamazaki, M. (eds.): Statistics guide for language study. Kuroshio, Tokyo (2010). (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fishkin, J.S.: When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Somerville, P.: Community governance and democracy. Policy Polit. 33(1), 117–144 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madoka Chosokabe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chosokabe, M. et al. (2015). Effects of Small Group Discussion: Case Study of Community Disaster Risk Management in Japan. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G., Szapiro, T. (eds) Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation. GDN 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19514-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19515-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics