Skip to main content

Deciphering Review Comments: Identifying Suggestions, Appreciations and Complaints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9103))

Abstract

The problem of classifying sentences into various categories, arises frequently in text mining applications. One of the most important categorization of sentences observed in product reviews, movie reviews, blogs, customer feedbacks is - Suggestions, Appreciations and Complaints. We observed that the document classification techniques do not perform well for these three non-topical sentence classes. We propose to solve this problem using a supervised approach based on Dependency-based Word Subsequence Kernel and its variations. We compare the performance of our approach with the state-of-the-art short text classification techniques on 2 different datasets - Performance Appraisal comments and Product Reviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the Stanford Dependency Parser for the typed dependencies [17].

  2. 2.

    To obtain the datasets, please contact the authors.

References

  1. Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z.A., O’shea, J.D., Crockett, K.: Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18, 1138–1150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoo, A., Marom, Y., Albrecht, D.: Experiments with sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Australasian Language Technology Workshop, pp. 18–25 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kate, R.J.: A dependency-based word subsequence kernel. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 400–409. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deshpande, S., Palshikar, G.K., Athiappan, G.: An unsupervised approach to sentence classification. In: COMAD, p. 88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg, A.B., Fillmore, N., Andrzejewski, D., Xu, Z., Gibson, B., Zhu, X.: May all your wishes come true: a study of wishes and how to recognize them. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 263–271. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pan, F.: Multi-dimensional Fragment Classification in Biomedical Text. Queen’s University, Kingston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mukherjee, A., Liu, B.: Modeling review comments. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers, vol. 1, pp. 320–329. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sudhof, M., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., Potts, C.: A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.6078 (2013)

  9. Wiebe, J., Riloff, E.: Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2005. LNCS, vol. 3406, pp. 486–497. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner, J., Foster, J., van Genabith, J.: Judging grammaticality: experiments in sentence classification. CALICO J. 26, 474–490 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kadoya, Y., Morita, K., Fuketa, M., Oono, M., Atlam, E.S., Sumitomo, T., Aoe, J.I.: A sentence classification technique using intention association expressions. Int. J. Comput. Math. 82, 777–792 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto, Y., Takagi, T.: A sentence classification system for multi biomedical literature summarization. In: 21st International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, pp. 1163–1163. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. He, Q., Chang, K., Lim, E.P.: Anticipatory event detection via sentence classification. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC 2006, vol. 2, pp. 1143–1148. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hachey, B., Grover, C.: Sequence modelling for sentence classification in a legal summarisation system. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 292–296. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification, pp. 1746–1751 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., Zanchetta, E.: The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Lang. Resour. Eval. 43, 209–226 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Marneffe, M.C., MacCartney, B., Manning, C.D., et al.: Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In: Proceedings of LREC, vol. 6, pp. 449–454 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McAuley, J., Leskovec, J.: Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pp. 165–172. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: Libsvm: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2, 27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, H., Ho, C., Juan, Y., Lin, C.: Libshorttext: a library for short-text classification and analysis. Technical report (2013). http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/libshorttext.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin Pawar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pawar, S., Ramrakhiyani, N., Palshikar, G.K., Hingmire, S. (2015). Deciphering Review Comments: Identifying Suggestions, Appreciations and Complaints. In: Biemann, C., Handschuh, S., Freitas, A., Meziane, F., Métais, E. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19581-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19581-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19580-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19581-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics