Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering ((BIOMEDICAL))

Abstract

By the early 1900s proteins had been studied for more than a hundred years. Chemists had begun to extract proteins such as albumin and wheat gluten from animals and plants at the beginning of the previous century. The Dutch chemist Gerardus Johannes Mulder (1802–1880) had found that each one of these proteins had nearly the same composition. He thought that all were variations on a single primordial substance composed of carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen with variable amounts of sulfur and phosphorus. In 1838, the Swedish chemist Jöns Jacob Berzelius (1779–1848) coined the name “protein” for this universal substance. These events were followed by groundbreaking investigations carried out in the later 1850s and 1860s by August Kekulé (1829–1896) that helped lay the foundations for structural chemistry and protein science. In his studies, Kekulé uncovered the tetravalent character of carbon, proposed its ability to bond to other carbons in long chains, and discovered the ring structure of benzene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Denaturation and Heat Coagulation

  • Anson, M. L., & Mirsky, A. E. (1934). The equilibrium between active native trypsin and inactive denatured trypsin. The Journal of General Physiology, 17, 393–398.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astbury, W. T., Dickinson, S., & Bailey, K. (1935). The X-ray interpretation of denaturation and the structure of the seed globulins. The Biochemical Journal, 29, 2351–2360.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chick, H., & Martin, C. J. (1910). On the “heat coagulation” of proteins. The Journal of Physiology, 40, 404–430.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirsky, A. E., & Pauling, L. (1936). On the structure of native, denatured, and coagulated proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 22, 439–447.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. (1931). Studies on denaturation of proteins. XIII. A theory of denaturation. The Chinese Journal of Physiology, 5, 321–344.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

The Alpha Helix and Beta-Pleated Sheet

  • Lovell, S. C. (2003). Structure validation by Cα geometry: φ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 50, 437–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauling, L., & Corey, R. B. (1951). The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 37, 251–256.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauling, L., Corey, R. B., & Branson, H. R. (1951). The structure of proteins: Two hydrogen bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 37, 205–210.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, G. N., Ramakrishnan, C., & Sasisekharan, V. (1963). Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. Journal of Molecular Biology, 7, 95–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

The First Protein Structures

  • Bragg, W. L. (1912). The diffraction of short electromagnetic waves by a crystal. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, XVII(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrew, J. C., Bodo, G., Dintzis, H. M., Parrish, R. C., Wyckoff, H., & Phillips, D. C. (1958). A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature, 181, 662–666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perutz, M. F. (1956). Isomorphous replacement and phase determination in non-centrosymmetric space groups. Acta Crystallographica, 9, 867–873.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perutz, M. F., Rossmann, M. G., Cullis, A. F., Muirhead, H., Will, G., & North, A. C. T. (1960). Structure of haemoglobin. A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 5.5-Å resolution, obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature, 185, 416–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Protein Folding and the Thermodynamic Hypothesis

  • Anfinsen, B. C. (1973). Principles that guide the folding of protein chains. Science, 181, 223–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutte, B., & Merrifield, R. B. (1969). The total synthesis of an enzyme with ribonuclease A activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 91, 501–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, R., et al. (1969). Studies on the total synthesis of an enzyme. V. The preparation of enzymatically active material. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 91, 507–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, C. (1968). Are there pathways for protein folding? Extrait du Journal de Chimie Physique, 65, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

Protein Anatomy and Protein Folding Hierarchy

  • Lindorff-Larsen, K., Røgen, P., Paci, E., Vendruscolo, M., & Dobson, C. M. (2005). Protein folding and the organization of the protein topology universe. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 30, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. S. (1981). The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 34, 167–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hydrophobic Forces

  • Chandler, D. (2005). Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature, 437, 640–647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauzmann, W. (1959). Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 14, 1–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. N., Shirley, B. A., McNutt, M., & Gajiwala, K. (1996). Forces contributing to the conformational stability of proteins. The FASEB Journal, 10, 75–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanford, C. (1962). Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to the stability of the globular conformation of proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 84, 4240–4247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Two-State Folding

  • Ansari, A., Jones, C. M., Henri, E. R., Hofrichter, J., & Eaton, W. A. (1992). The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational change. Science, 256, 1796–1798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Best, R. B., & Hummer, G. (2010). Coordinate-dependent diffusion in protein folding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1088–1093.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fersht, A. R., & Daggett, V. (2002). Protein folding and unfolding at atomic resolution. Cell, 108, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramers, H. A. (1940). Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica, 7, 284–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Folding of Alpha Helices and Beta-Hairpins

  • Blanco, F. J., Rivas, G., & Serrano, L. (1994). A short linear peptide that folds in a native stable β-hairpin in aqueous solution. Nature Structural Biology, 1, 584–590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubelka, J., Hofrichter, J., & Eaton, W. A. (2004). The protein folding ‘speed limit’. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 14, 76–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lifson, S., & Roig, A. (1961). On the theory of helix-coil transition in polypeptides. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 34, 1963–1974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, V., Thompson, P. A., Hofrichter, J., & Eaton, W. A. (1997). Folding dynamics and mechanism of β-hairpin formation. Nature, 390, 196–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaxco, K. W., Simons, K. T., & Baker, D. (1998). Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 277, 985–994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimm, B. H., & Bragg, J. K. (1959). Theory of the phase transition between helix and random coil in polypeptide chains. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 31, 526–535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Strategies and Models

  • Aurora, R., & Rose, G. D. (1998). Helix capping. Protein Science, 7, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, A. G., Skelton, N. J., & Starovasnik, M. A. (2001). Tryptophan zippers: Stable, monomeric β-hairpins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 5578–5583.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, K. A., Fiebig, K. M., & Chan, H. S. (1993). Cooperativity in protein folding kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90, 1942–1946.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fersht, A. R. (1997). Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 7, 3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E., & Fersht, A. R. (1995). The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analyzed by protein engineering methods: Evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. Journal of Molecular Biology, 254, 260–288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, M., & Weaver, D. L. (1976). Protein folding dynamics. Science, 260, 404–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, M., & Weaver, D. L. (1994). Protein folding dynamics: The diffusion-collision model and experimental data. Protein Science, 3, 650–668.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. S., & Baldwin, R. L. (1982). Specific intermediates in the folding reactions of small proteins and the mechanism of protein folding. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 51, 459–489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan, S. B., Wu, G. A., Chodera, J. D., & Dill, K. A. (2007). Protein folding by zipping and assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 11987–11992.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. N., et al. (2011). Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability. Journal of Molecular Biology, 408, 514–528.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ptitsyn, O. B. (1987). Protein folding: Hypothesis and experiments. Journal of Protein Chemistry, 6, 273–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetlaufer, D. B. (1973). Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70, 697–701.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix 1. X-Ray Crystallography

Appendix 1. X-Ray Crystallography

In their work, the Bragg’s noted that a three-dimensional crystal could be viewed as a set of equidistant parallel planes. In these situations, the conditions for maximal constructive interference are twofold. First the scattering from each plane must be a specular, or mirror, that is, reflection in which the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. This situation is depicted in Fig. 2.13. Second the X-ray wavelength λ, distance between parallel planes d, and angle of reflection θ obey the relationship known as Bragg’s law:

Fig. 2.13
figure 13

The arrangement of crystal planes and the geometry in Bragg’s law

$$ 2d \sin \theta =n\lambda $$
(2.7)

In Eq. (2.7), n is an integer that can take on the values 1, 2, 3, and so on. When n = 1, the spots of light are known as first order reflections, and when n = 2, they are called second order reflections. First order reflections are more intense than second order reflections, and similarly for third and higher order contributions.

In more detail, x-rays are produced whenever swiftly moving electrons strike a solid target. In an X-ray tube, a beam of electrons is generated that strikes a metallic anode (typically copper) to produce an X-ray beam. The X-rays in the beam are scattered by the electron clouds of atoms, particularly by tightly bound electrons near the center of the atoms. Light scattered from single atoms is too weak to observe, but the amount of light can be amplified using purified crystals. In a crystal, large numbers of identical molecules are arranged in a regular lattice. Light passing through a crystal will be scattered in a variety of directions. Spherical wavelets scattered by different atoms will interfere, some constructively and some destructively. For certain wavelengths and scattering directions, the wavelets will be in phase to produce strong constructive interference. Constructive interference taking place between light waves scattered off of the atoms serves to amplify the light, producing a characteristic pattern of light spots and dark areas, a diffraction pattern that can be seen and analyzed to yield information on how the atoms are arranged.

The light spots are produced when the light waves arrive at the detector in phase with one another and thus constructively interfere. In an X-ray diffraction experiment, the intensities and positions of the light spots are recorded. The diffraction patterns are converted into electron density maps through application of a mathematical operation known as a Fourier transform. Several tens of thousands of reflections are collected in a typical X-ray diffraction experiment. Computer programs, taking as input the resulting electron density map and knowledge of the primary sequence, are used to deduce the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms in the protein (Fig. 2.14).

Fig. 2.14
figure 14

Schematic depictions of the steps in X-ray crystallography in which an incident X-ray beam is directed at a crystal containing an array of unit cells, each cell containing the protein of interest. The two-dimensional diffraction pattern (here shown in 1D form with its peaks and valleys) is then Fourier-transformed (once the phase problem is solved). The resulting electron density map is further analyzed to produce the 3D protein structure

Today, once they are discovered, the three-dimensional coordinates (x, y, z) for each atom in a protein are routinely deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and made available to the research community. The PDB repository was established at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Long Island, and at several mirror sites throughout the world. Of the more than 84,000 structures for proteins and peptides that have been deposited in the PDB to-date, 75,000 were determined using X-ray crystallography and 9000 using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (to be discussed in Chap. 3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckerman, M. (2015). Protein Folding: Part I—Basic Principles. In: Fundamentals of Neurodegeneration and Protein Misfolding Disorders. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22117-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics