Skip to main content

Why It Is Worth and What Is the Key to Support a Desired Corporate Reputation: A Review

  • Conference paper
Business Challenges in the Changing Economic Landscape - Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 2/2))

  • 965 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze and systematize different approaches to corporate reputation and its support, highlighting the value of corporate reputation, assessing the problem of stakeholder heterogeneous perception of corporate reputation and identifying key dimensions of supporting a high corporate reputation. In this paper we have revealed that there is worth to support a high reputation because of the economic value, the relationship value and the value related to competitive advantage. To support a high reputation, an organization must define this construct and understand how it can be perceived by various stakeholders. We propose a definition which compounds the support of high corporate reputation. Nevertheless, this paper reviews that reputation can be supported with regard to key dimensions of corporate reputation, treating them as basic tools and considering communication as the most important one. The paper proposes an integrated view to corporate reputation and highlights new insights to communication while supporting a high corporate reputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abratt, R., & Kleyn, N. (2012). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate reputations. Reconciliation and integration. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 1048–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S. A. (2006). Corporate marketing. Integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 730–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benthaus, J., Pahlke, I., Beck, R., & Seebach, C. (2013). Improving sensing and seizing capabilities of a firm by measuring corporate reputation based on social media data. In ECIS 2013: 21st European Conference on Information Systems, 2013, June 5–8 (pp. 1–12). Netherlands: Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N., Booker, L., & Serenko, A. (2007). The mediating effect of organizational reputation on customer loyalty and service recommendation in the banking industry. Management Decisions, 45(9), 1426–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (2002). Comparing corporate reputations: League tables, quotients, benchmarks, or case studies? Corporate Reputation Review, 5(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A. (1997). Corporate reputation: Concept and measurement. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(2), 109–118.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91–109.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, K., Oliver, E. G., & Ramamoorti, S. (2003). The reputation index: Measuring and managing corporate reputation. European Management Journal, 21(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V., & Roper, S. (2003). Corporate reputation and competitiveness. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(4), 368–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castro, G. M., Lopez, J. E. N., & Lopez Saez, P. (2006). Business and social reputation: Exploring the concept and main dimensions of corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. D. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolphin, R. R. (2004). Corporate reputation—A value creation strategy. Corporate Governance, 4(3), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R. (2004). Journalists’ evaluation of corporate reputations. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(2), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R. (2006a). Communicating corporate reputation through stories. California Management Review, 49(1), 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R. (2006b). How good corporate reputations create corporate value. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnley, M. (1993). Corporate reputation: The wasted asset. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 11(11), 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, P. M., Bahamonde, R. A., & Bellido, I. V. (2014). A new approach for measuring corporate reputation. Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 54(1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, L., & Kirchgeorg, M. (2007). The role concept in corporate branding and stakeholder management reconsidered: Are stakeholder groups really different? Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firestein, P. J. (2006). Building and protecting corporate reputation. Strategy & Leadership, 34(4), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realising value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(12), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (2004). Managing your company’s most valuable asset: Its reputation. Critical Eye, (September–October), 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, J., & Argenti, P. A. (2005). How corporate communication influences strategy implementation, reputation and corporate brand: An exploratory qualitative study. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaultier-Gaillard, S., & Louisot, J. P. (2006). Risks to reputation: A global approach. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice, 31(3), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goergen, M. (2013). Corporate stakeholders and trust. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 11, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guru, B. P. M., Sanjeevaraja, C., Gopala, N., & Parashivamurthy, M. (2013). Essentials of corporate communication for reputation management: An overview. Global Journal of Commerce & Management Perspective, 2(4), 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S. (2007). One reputation or many? Comparing stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(3), 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, P., & Milewicz, J. (1995). To be or not to be, credible that is? A model of reputation and credibility among competing firms. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 13(6), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2009). Segmenting stakeholders in terms of corporate responsibility: implications for reputation management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keh, H. T., & Xie, Y. (2009). Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 732–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. H. (1977). Nurturing corporate images: Total communication or ego trip? European Journal of Marketing, 11(3), 120–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., Li, D., & Huang, W. (2003). Reputation, reputation system and reputation distribution—An explanatory study in online consumer-to-consumer auctions. In R. Azari (Ed.), Current security management and ethical issues of information technology (pp. 249–266). USA: Idea Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maden, C., Arikan, A., Telci, E. E., & Kantur, D. (2012). Linking corporate social responsibility to corporate reputation: A study on understanding behavioral consequences. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markwick, N., & Fill, C. (1997). Towards a framework for managing corporate identity. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6), 396–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola, P., Ravasi, D., & Gabbioneta, C. (2006). How to build reputation in financial markets. Long Range Planning, 39, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E., & Halinen, A. (2013). Customer participation and value creation: A systematic review and research implications. Managing Service Quality, 23(4), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olegario, R., & McKenna, C. (2013). Introduction: Corporate reputation in historical perspective. Business History Review, 87, 643–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmedo-Cifuentes, I., Martinez-Leon, I. M., & Davies, G. (2014). Managing internal stakeholders’ views of corporate reputation. Service Business, 8, 83–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omar, M., Williams, R. L., Jr., & Lingelbach, D. (2009). Global brand market-entry strategy to manage corporate reputation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(3), 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Lee, H., & Kim, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 67, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., Loock, M., Cerruti, J., & Muyot, M. (2012). Sustainability: How stakeholder perceptions differ from corporate reality. California Management Review, 55(1), 74–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrokaite, K., & Stravinskiene, J. (2013). Corporate reputation management decisions: Customer’s perspective. Engineering Economics, 24(5), 496–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podnar, K., TuÅ¡kej, U., & Golob, U. (2012). Mapping semantic meaning of corporate reputation in global economic crisis context: A Slovenian study. Public Relations Review, 38, 906–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Phillips, D. J. (1996). The dynamics of organizational status. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przepiorka, W. (2013). Buyers pay for and sellers invest in a good reputation: More evidence from eBay. Journal of Socio-Economics, 42, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puncheva, P. (2008). The role of corporate reputation in the stakeholder decision—Making process. Business & Society, 47(3), 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puncheva-Mitchelotti, P., & Mitchelotti, M. (2010). The role of the stakeholder perspective in measuring corporate reputation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(3), 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regester, M., & Larkin, J. (2005). Risk issues and crisis management: A casebook of best practice. London: Chartered Institute of Public Relations, Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V. P. (1997). The image cascade and the formation of corporate reputations. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1/2), 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaiger, M. (2004). Components and parameters of corporate reputation—An empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 46–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semons, A. (1998). Reputation management: The Shandwick way. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(4), 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamma, H. M., & Hassan, S. S. (2009). Customer and non-customer perspectives for examining corporate reputation. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 18(5), 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siano, A., Kitchen, P. J., & Confetto, M. G. (2010). Financial resources and corporate reputation. Toward common management principles for managing corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siano, A., Vollero, A., & Siglioccolo, M. (2007). Corporate reputation management: A set of drivers in the governance-structure-system model. Empirical evidences from crisis communication. In 11th International Conference on Reputation, Brand, Identity and Competitiveness, 2007, May 31–June 3 (pp. 1–32). Norway: BI Norwegian School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaiziene, I., & Jucevicius, R. (2009). Corporate reputation: Multidisciplinary richness and search for a relevant definition. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 2, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varey, R. J. (2002). Marketing communication. Principles and practice. London and New York [online]. Accessed November 4, 2014, from http://www.google.lt/books?hl=en&lr=&id=I3PXBiTNy-kC&oi=fnd&pg=PA96&dq=marketing+communication+book&ots=-xYjE-Ene_&sig=pytq-bnWxXxJCtK36WxO4SehAWM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=marketing%20communication%20book&f=false

  • Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Migle Matuleviciene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matuleviciene, M., Stravinskiene, J. (2016). Why It Is Worth and What Is the Key to Support a Desired Corporate Reputation: A Review. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Business Challenges in the Changing Economic Landscape - Vol. 2. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 2/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22593-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics