Skip to main content

Epistemic Politics at Work: National Policy, an Upstate New York Synchrotron, and the Rise of Protein Crystallography

  • Chapter
The Local Configuration of New Research Fields

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook ((SOSC,volume 29))

Abstract

This chapter explores the linkage of local and trans-local forces in the rise of synchrotron x-ray protein crystallography. In considering how a new kind of laboratory organization, whose purpose was to spur the growth of synchrotron x-ray protein crystallography in the U.S., played a crucial role as an incubator and proving ground for experimental techniques and methods that spread throughout the burgeoning field, the chapter describes the national and regional forces involved in the birth and growth of the organization, local actions and conceptions at the laboratory, and the ‘epistemic politics’ that operationalized these factors into successful change. The chapter shows how a renegotiation of the relationship between authority, control, and knowledge production – the epistemic politics – at the lab was the crucial mechanism by which the dialectic of larger forces and local work was engaged as an ‘agent’ of growth for this emerging field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The descriptions of the episodes are drawn from participant observation and interviews from 1993 to 1999 (Doing 2009).

References

  • BioSync. 1997. Structural biology and synchrotron radiation: Evaluation of resources and needs, Report of BioSync – the structural biology synchrotron users organization. Stanford: SSRL, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESR. 1977. Proposal to establish a high-energy synchrotron radiation laboratory associated with the Cornell 8 GeV storage ring, Submitted to the National Science Foundation, 30 Sept 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. 1985. Changing order: Replication and induction in laboratory practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crease, R. 2008. Recombinant science: The birth of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38(4): 535–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doing, P. 2004. “Lab hands” and the “Scarlet O”: Epistemic politics and (scientific) labor. Social Studies of Science 34(3): 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doing, P. 2009. Velvet revolution at the synchrotron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1986. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California-Berkeley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. 1993. Riding the action/structure pendulum with those swinging sociologists of science. In The outlook for STS: Report on an STS symposium and workshop, ed. Jasanoff, S. Ithaca: Department of Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, E. 2005. Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 787–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallonsten, O. 2011. Growing big science in a small country: MAX-Lab and the Swedish Research Policy System. Historical Studies of the Natural Sciences 41(2): 179–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallonsten, O., and T. Heinze. 2012. Institutional persistence through gradual organizational adaptation: Analysis of national laboratories in the USA and Germany. Science and Public Policy 39: 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallonsten, O., and T. Heinze. 2013. From particle physics to photon science: Multi-dimensional and multi-level renewal at DESY and SLAC. Science and Public Policy 40(5): 591–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D.P. 1992. SLAC sees writing on the wall. Science 24: 432–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. 1996. Resource sharing in biomedical research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. 1977. The essential tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. 1985. Art and artifact in laboratory science. Boston: Routledge and Keegan Paul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. 1973. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, M. 2010. Reinventing a laboratory: Nanotechnology as a resource for organizational change. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 27: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. 1976. Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information 15(4): 637–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J. 2001. Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. American Sociological Review 66(3): 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. 1986. Confronting nature: The sociology of solar neutrino detection. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, B. 1999. Concrete practices: Testing in an earthquake-engineering laboratory. Social Studies of Science 29(4): 483–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford News Service. 1993. News Release, October 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M.A. 1993. State struggles to retain its Allure as Science Center: Technology officials hope to locate an antimatter lab at Stanford, helping rebuild California’s research base, Los Angeles Times, 29 July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinck, D. 2007. Back to the laboratory as a knowledge production space. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances 1(2): 160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, C. 2012. Institutional persistence and the material transformation of the US national labs: The curious story of the advent of the advanced photon source. Science and Public Policy 39: 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R., J. Gläser, and L. Engwall (eds.). 2010. Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaris, L. 1993. LBL Newsletter, October 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Park Doing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doing, P. (2016). Epistemic Politics at Work: National Policy, an Upstate New York Synchrotron, and the Rise of Protein Crystallography. In: Merz, M., Sormani, P. (eds) The Local Configuration of New Research Fields. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22683-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22683-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22682-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22683-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics