Skip to main content

Abstract

During the past three decades, major changes have occurred in the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. For many years, open CBD exploration was the gold standard for managing choledocholithiasis. However, the advent of endoscopy and minimally invasive surgery, with considerably lower morbidity and mortality, has replaced open surgery as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, an understanding of the potential complications is essential for treatment planning and postoperative care. The most common complications of laparoscopic and open approaches to CBD exploration are retained and recurrent CBD stones, bile leak, bile duct injury, abscess/cholangitis, and pancreatitis. This chapter reviews these potential complications of and discusses the management of major intraoperative, postoperative, and delayed complications related to surgical treatment of CBD stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(11):1705–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Rosenthal R, Liberman M, Fallas M. Update on transcystic exploration of the bile duct. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6(6):453–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G. Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 1998;228(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorman JP, Franklin ME, Glass JL. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy. An effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(7):926–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, Guillon F, Rodier JG, Fingerhut A. One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(1):12–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Papalezova K, Clary B. Blumgart’s surgery of the liver, pancreas and biliary tract. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grubnik VV, Tkachenko AI, Ilyashenko VV, Vorotyntseva KO. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2165–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lau WY, Fan ST, Yip WC, Poon GP, Wong KK. Optimal irrigation pressures in operative choledochoscopy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1988;58(1):63–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orenstein SB, Marks JM, Hardacre JM. Technical aspects of bile duct evaluation and exploration. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(2):281–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters JH, Ollila D, Nichols KE, Gibbons GD, Davanzo MA, Miller J, Front ME, Innes JT, Ellison EC. Diagnosis and management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(3):163–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Tsalis K, Kanellos I, Demetriades H, Betsis D. The endoscopic management of persistent bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(5):843–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baron TH. Endoscopic management of biliary disorders: diagnostic and therapeutic. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(2):395–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomson BNJ, Parks RW, Madhavan KK, Wigmore SJ, Garden OJ. Early specialist repair of biliary injury. Br J Surg. 2006;93(2):216–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lillemoe KD, Martin SA, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Talamini MA, Kaushal S, Coleman J, Venbrux AC, Savader SJ, Osterman FA, Pitt HA. Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):459–68. discussion 468–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercado MA, Chan C, Jacinto JC, Sanchez N, Barajas A. Voluntary and involuntary ligature of the bile duct in iatrogenic injuries: a nonadvisable approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(6):1029–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Misra S, Melton GB, Geschwind JF, Venbrux AC, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD. Percutaneous management of bile duct strictures and injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decade of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(2):218–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brittain RS, Marchioro TL, Hermann G, Waddell WR, Starzl TE. Accidental hepatic artery ligation in humans. Am J Surg. 1964;107:822–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Koffron A, Ferrario M, Parsons W, Nemcek A, Saker M, Abecassis M. Failed primary management of iatrogenic biliary injury: incidence and significance of concomitant hepatic arterial disruption. Surgery. 2001;130(4):722–8. discussion 728–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Girard RM, Legros G. Retained and recurrent bile duct stones. Surgical or nonsurgical removal? Ann Surg. 1981;193(2):150–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, Ghafouri A, Soroush A, Hedayat A, Kaveie E. Outcome of common bile duct exploration without intraoperative cholangiography: a case series and review of literature. Acad J Surg. 2014;1(2):30–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR. T-tube drainage versus primary closure after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6, CD005640.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang W-J, Xu G-F, Wu G-Z, Li J-M, Dong Z-T, Mo X-D. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res. 2009;157(1):e1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. ElGeidie AA. Single-session minimally invasive management of common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(41):15144–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hameed K, Azami R, Jaffery W, Hameed T. Retained stones in the common bile duct: results of management. J Pak Med Assoc. 1993;43(5):90–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiappetta Porras LT, Nápoli ED, Canullán CM, Quesada BM, Petracchi JE, Oría AS. Laparoscopic bile duct reexploration for retained duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(9):1518–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Escarce JJ, Shea JA, Chen W, Qian Z, Schwartz JS. Outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the elderly: a longitudinal analysis of 21,000 cases in the prelaparoscopic era. Surgery. 1995;117(2):156–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sheridan WG, Williams HO, Lewis MH. Morbidity and mortality of common bile duct exploration. Br J Surg. 1987;74(12):1095–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Lezoche E. Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):705–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK. Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Deutsch AA, Nudelman I, Gutman H, Reiss R. Choledochoduodenostomy an important surgical tool in the management of common bile duct stones. A review of 126 cases. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(9):531–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Strasberg SM, Picus DD, Drebin JA. Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided component. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5(3):266–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mercado MA, Orozco H, de la Garza L, López-Martínez LM, Contreras A, Guillén-Navarro E. Biliary duct injury: partial segment IV resection for intrahepatic reconstruction of biliary lesions. Arch Surg. 1999;134(9):1008–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Cameron JL. Postoperative bile duct strictures. Surg Clin North Am. 1990;70(6):1355–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. de Reuver PR, Grossmann I, Busch OR, Obertop H, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ. Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):763–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C, Kalia A, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4164–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg. 2010;145(8):757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, Brown N. Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery. 2007;142(4):450–6. discussion 456–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Monteiro da Cunha JE, Machado MC, Herman P, Bacchella T, Abdo EE, Penteado S, Jukemura J, Montagnini A, Machado MA, Pinotti HW. Surgical treatment of cicatricial biliary strictures. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45(23):1452–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fujii T, Kato H, Suzaki M, Noguchi T, Isaji S. Is it possible to predict the development of an incisional surgical site infection and its severity after biliary tract surgery for benign disease? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19(4):389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mohammed S, Evans C, VanBuren G, Hodges SE, Silberfein E, Artinyan A, Mo Q, Issazadeh M, McElhany AL, Fisher WE. Treatment of bacteriobilia decreases wound infection rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(6):592–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sourrouille I, Gaujoux S, Lacave G, Bert F, Dokmak S, Belghiti J, Paugam-Burtz C, Sauvanet A. Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(6):473–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Malik AA, Bari SU, Rouf KA, Wani KA. Pyogenic liver abscess: changing patterns in approach. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2(12):395–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ochsner A, DeBakey M, Murray S. Pyogenic abscess of the liver. Am J Surg. 1938;40(1):292–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bari S, Sheikh KA, Malik AA, Wani RA, Naqash SH. Percutaneous aspiration versus open drainage of liver abscess in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(1):69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hunt DR, Blumgart LH. Iatrogenic choledochoduodenal fistula: an unsuspected cause of post-cholecystectomy symptoms. Br J Surg. 1980;67(1):10–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(1):80–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, Minoli G, Crosta C, Comin U, Fertitta A, Prada A, Rubis Passoni G, Testoni PA. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(2):417–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jeurnink SM, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, Dees J, Poley JW, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognostic model for early discharge. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2892–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCK, Wong RCK, Ferrari AP, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Ruymann FW, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke DL. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):652–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilcox CM, Canakis J, Mönkemüller KE, Bondora AW, Geels W. Patterns of bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy, the subsequent risk of bleeding, and the role of epinephrine injection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(2):244–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ferreira LEVVC, Baron TH. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding: who, what, when, and how. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(12):2850–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shah JN, Marson F, Binmoeller KF. Temporary self-expandable metal stent placement for treatment of post-sphincterotomy bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(6):1274–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Aslinia F, Hawkins L, Darwin P, Goldberg E. Temporary placement of a fully covered metal stent to tamponade bleeding from endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(4):911–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mutignani M, Seerden T, Tringali A, Feisal D, Perri V, Familiari P, Costamagna G. Endoscopic hemostasis with fibrin glue for refractory postsphincterotomy and postpapillectomy bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(4):856–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Saeed M, Kadir S, Kaufman SL, Murray RR, Milligan F, Cotton PB. Bleeding following endoscopic sphincterotomy: angiographic management by transcatheter embolization. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35(4):300–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jersek M, Vracko J. Sphincterotomy of Oddi’s muscle through posterior distal duodenum: a modified technique with low morbidity and mortality. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43(8):377–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Makary MA, Elariny HA. Laparoscopic transduodenal sphincteroplasty. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16(6):629–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sulkowski U, Kautz G, Nottberg H, Förster E. [Surgical therapy of hemorrhage after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Indications and technique]. Chirurg. 1996;67(1):26–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, Garry D. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232(2):191–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Assalia A, Suissa A, Ilivitzki A, Mahajna A, Yassin K, Hashmonai M, Krausz MM. Validity of clinical criteria in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related duodenal perforations. Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1059–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, Jacob KM, Helzberg JH. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(5):1267–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Pannu HK, Fishman EK. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of abnormalities demonstrated with CT. Radiographics. 2001;21(6):1441–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP. 2012;13(1):18–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, Voli J, Leitman IM. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(4):833–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Preetha M, Chung Y-FA, Chan W-H, Ong H-S, Chow PKH, Wong W-K, Ooi LLPJ, Soo K-C. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(12):1011–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR, Sutherland FR. Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(5):393–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC, Shah RJ, Shaw RJ, Chen YK, Brown WR, Stiegmann G. Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg. 2008;196(6):975–81. discussion 981–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Warren J, Hardy D, MacFadyen Jr B. Management of endoscopic complications. In: Principles of flexible endoscopy for surgeons. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 227.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  71. Fukino N, Oida T, Kawasaki A, Mimatsu K, Kuboi Y, Kano H, Amano S. Impaction of a lithotripsy basket during endoscopic lithotomy of a common bile duct stone. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(22):2832–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Cid JA, Lobo DN. Impacted biliary basket. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(1):110–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Schutz SM, Chinea C, Friedrichs P. Successful endoscopic removal of a severed, impacted Dormia basket. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(4):679–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Attila T, May GR, Kortan P. Nonsurgical management of an impacted mechanical lithotriptor with fractured traction wires: endoscopic intracorporeal electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy followed by extra-endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22(8):699–702.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Pruitt A, Schutz SM, Baron T, McClendon D, Lang KA. Fractured hydrophilic guidewire during ERCP: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(1):77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Subramaniam N, Kudari AK, Naik BM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography requiring surgical intervention: one-year experience in a tertiary care centre. J Surg. 2015;3(1):12–6.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Silviera ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, Prosciak MP, Doraiswamy VA, Wang CF, Lorenzo M, Truitt M, Biboa J, Jarvis AM, Narula VK, Steinberg SM, Stawicki SP. Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009;18(1):73–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence Jackson M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khadra, H., Jackson, T., Marks, J. (2016). Management of Surgical Complications. In: Hazey, J., Conwell, D., Guy, G. (eds) Multidisciplinary Management of Common Bile Duct Stones. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22765-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22765-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22764-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22765-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics