Skip to main content

New Competences to Develop in Students to Help Them Get Involved in Sustainable Development While They Learn Through Inquiry Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Developments in Science and Technology Education

Part of the book series: Innovations in Science Education and Technology ((ISET,volume 23))

  • 1151 Accesses

Abstract

The sustainability competences field was established because of current complex problems: climate change, desertification, pandemics… These interdependent, contradictory and urgent problems do not have immediate solutions. To solve problems, to take advantage of opportunities, to become agents of change and managers of a society in transition, learners should develop key competences in sustainability. In sustainability science, researchers recommend the development of many key competences linked to complex problems analysis and societal transformation.

The analysis of the Canadian science and technology curricula highlights two common pedagogical approaches: inquiry and technological problem solving. Some sustainability competences feature among the analyzed science programs’ objectives: problem solving, critical thinking and creativity. Other competences could advantageously be added: strategic action; systemic, design and futures thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breiting, S., Hedegaard, K., Mogensen, F., Nielsen, K., & Schnack, K. (2009). Action competence, conflicting interests and environmental education. Copenhagen: Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. http://itsisu.concord.org/share/Bybee_21st_Century_Paper.pdf. Visited 8-Jan-2014.

  4. Crofton, F. (2000). Educating for sustainability: Opportunities in undergraduate engineering. Journal of Clean Production, 8(5), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daly, H. E. (1993). Sustainable growth: An impossible theorem. In H. E. Daly & K. E. Townsend (Eds.), Valuing the earth: Economics, ecology, ethics (pp. 267–273). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK «21» programme in Germany: A «Gestaltungskompetenz»-based model for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrenfeld, J. (2008). Sustainability by design: A subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erickson, H. L. (2007). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grunwald, A. (2007). Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. Journal of Environmental Policy Plan, 9(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hampson, G. P. (2012). Ecological education for the long emergency. Futures, 44, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hicks, D. (2006). Lessons for the future: The missing dimension of education. Victoria: Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inayatullah, S. (2007). Questioning the future: Methods and tools for organizational and societal transformation. Tamsui/Taipei: Tamkang University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jonnaert, P., Barrette, J., Boufrahi, S., & Masciotra, D. (2004). Contribution critique au développement des programmes d’études : compétences, constructivisme et interdisciplinarité. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30, 667–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kearins, K., & Springett, D. (2003). Educating for sustainability: Developing critical skills. Journal of Management Education, 27, 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerry, J., Pruneau, D., Blain, S., et al. (2012). Human competences that facilitate adaptation to climate change: A research in progress. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 4, 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lockwood, T. (2010). Design thinking. New York: Alworth Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meadows, D., & Randers, J. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mochizuki, Y., & Fadeeva, Z. (2010). Competences for sustainable development and sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Montuori, A. (2012). Creative inquiry: Confronting the challenges of scholarship in the 21st century. Futures, 44, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Norberg, J., & Cumming, G. S. (2008). Complexity theory for a sustainable future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OCDE). Building the right skills and turning them into better jobs and better lives. http://skills.oecd.org. Visited 21-Oct-2013.

  22. Parkin, S., Johnston, A., Buckland, H., & White, E. Learning and skills for sustainable development: Developing a sustainability literate society. Guidance for Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability and Forum for the Future. http://www.forumforthefuture.org.org.uk. Visited 8-Jul-2005.

  23. Porter, T., & Cordoba, J. (2009). Three views of systems theories and their implications for sustainability education. Journal of Management Education, 33, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pruneau, D., Kerry, J., & Langis, J. (2013). Étude des compétences propices au soin et à la transformation de l’environnement. Vertigo, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pruneau, D., Kerry, M., Langis, J., & Léger, M. L. (2013). De nouvelles compétences ΰ développer chez les élèves du primaire en sciences et technologies: pratiques et possibilités. Rapport de synthèse de connaissances. Moncton: Université de Moncton, Groupe de recherche Littoral et vie.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rieckman, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rockstrom, J., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sterling, S. (1996). Education in change. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling (Eds.), Education for sustainability (pp. 18–39). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sterling, S., & Maiteny, P. (2005). Linking thinking. Perthshire: World Wildlife Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sterling, S., & Thomas, I. (2006). Education for sustainability : The role of capabilities in guiding university curricula. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Teaching for wisdom, intelligence, creativity, and success. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Utzschneider, A., & Pruneau, D. (2011). La prise de décision en environnement: théorie et perspectives pédagogiques. The Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wals, A. (2010). Mirroring, Gestaltswitching, and transformative social learning: Stepping stones for developing sustainability competence. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11, 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Withycombe, L., & Wiek, A. (2010). Anticipatory competence as a key competence in sustainability (Working Paper). School of Sustainability, Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  36. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) for contributing to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Pruneau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pruneau, D., Kerry, J., Langis, J. (2016). New Competences to Develop in Students to Help Them Get Involved in Sustainable Development While They Learn Through Inquiry Methods. In: Riopel, M., Smyrnaiou, Z. (eds) New Developments in Science and Technology Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22933-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22933-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22932-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22933-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics