Skip to main content

Verification and Arms Control Treaties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism in the Post-9/11 World
  • 1031 Accesses

Abstract

Super-power leaders, Regan and Gorbachev, had just signed the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in Washington. Signing INF marked the beginning of the end of the Cold War, two years before the November 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall, 3 years before the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty (CFE) was signed in 1990 and 5 years before the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) was signed.

Trust, but verify.

[President Ronald Reagan to General-Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev, 8 Dec. 1987]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pifer (2010).

  2. 2.

    Collina (2012).

Bibliography

  • Cahn, A. (1998). Killing detente: The right attacks the CIA. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collina, T. (2012, September). Cartwright urges nuclear spending cuts. Arms Control Today, 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, J., et al. (2011). Detect and deter: Can countries verify the nuclear test ban. NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drell, S., & Purifoy, R. (1994). Technical issues of a nuclear test ban. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 44, 285–327.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Drell, S., & Schultz, G. (2007). Implications of the Reykjavik summit on its 20th anniversary. Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. (1980). Arms control verification and on-site inspection. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elachi, C. (1987). Introduction to the physics and techniques of remote sensing. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiveson, H., et al. (2015). Unmaking the bomb. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, S. (1988). Towards a comprehensive test ban. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T. (2002). Disarmament sketches: Three decades of arms control international law. Seattle, WA: U. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafemeister, D. (1997). Reflections on the GAO report on the nuclear triad. SAGS, 6, 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafemeister, D. (2005). Presidential report: Net benefit analysis of US/Soviet arms control. SAGS, 13, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafemeister, D. (2007). Progress in CTBT monitoring. Science Global Security, 15(3), 151–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafemeister, D. (2014). Physics of societal issues. NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, S. (1991). The Sampson option. NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanloz, R. (2000). Science-based stockpile stewardship. Physics Today, 53(12), 44–50.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2014). Open skies. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A. (2012 April 5). The mysterious end of the Soviet Union. NY Review of Books, 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krass, A. (1997). The United States and arms control. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krepon, M., & Caldwell, D. (1991). Politics of arms control treaty ratification. NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krepon, M., & Umberger, M. (1988). Verification and compliance. Westport, CT: Ballinger.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, H., Meunier, R., & Ritson, D. (1989). Some technical issues in arms control. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 39, 151–182.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, M. (2000). The scientific community and intelligence collection. Physics Today, 53(12), 51–56.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy Sciences. (2002). Technical issues related to the comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty. Washington, DC: NAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy Sciences. (2005). Monitoring nuclear weapons and nuclear-explosive materials. Washington, DC: NAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy Sciences. (2012). The comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty: Technical issues for the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (2002). Low-yield earth-penetrating nuclear weapons. Science Global Security, 10, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office Technology Assessment. (1991). Verification technologies. Washington, DC: OTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pifer, S. (2010). The next round: The US and nuclear arms reductions after new START (pp. 8–14). Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, T., & Stillman, D. (2009). The nuclear express. Minneapolis, MN: Zenith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richelson, J. (1998). Scientists in black. Scientific American, 278(2), 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbins, F. (2000). Remote sensing. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaff, D., Kim, W., & Richards, P. (2012). Seismological constraints on low-yield nuclear tests. SAGS, 20, 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, G., et al. (2008). Reykjavik revisited: Steps toward a world free of nuclear weapons. Stanford, CA: Hoover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, G., et al. (2011). Deterrence: Its past and future. Palo Alto, CA: Hoover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1980). Doubletalk: The story of SALT I. NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsipis, K., Hafemeister, D., & Janeway, P. (Eds.). (1986). Arms control verification. Washington, DC: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. (1996). Arms control and disarmament agreements. Washington, DC: ACDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, P., et al. (2003). New signatures of underground nuclear tests revealed by satellite radar interferometry. Geophysical Research Letters 30, 2141–2145

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, F., & Sagdeev, R. (Eds.). (1990). Reversing the arms race. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R., & Melton, H. (2008). Spycraft, the secret history of the CIA’s spytechs. NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, W. (2012 March). Conventional arms control in Europe: Is there a last chance? Arms Control Today, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hafemeister .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hafemeister, D. (2016). Verification and Arms Control Treaties. In: Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism in the Post-9/11 World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics