Skip to main content

Positioning by Intersection Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geospatial Algebraic Computations

Abstract

The similarity between resection methods presented in the previous chapter and intersection methods discussed herein is their application of angular observations. The distinction between the two however, is that for resection, the unknown station is occupied while for intersection, the unknown station is observed. Resection uses measuring devices (e.g., theodolite, total station, camera etc.) which occupy the unknown station. Angular (direction) observations are then measured to three or more known stations as we saw in the preceding chapter. Intersection approach on the contrary measures angular (direction) observations to the unknown station; with the measuring device occupying each of the three or more known stations. It has the advantage of being able to position an unknown station which can not be physically occupied. Such cases are encountered for instance during engineering constructions or cadastral surveying. During civil engineering construction for example, it may occur that a station can not be occupied because of swampiness or risk of sinking ground. In such a case, intersection approach can be used. The method is also widely applicable in photogrammetry. In aero-triangulation process, simultaneous resection and intersection are carried out where common rays from two or more overlapping photographs intersect at a common ground point (see e.g., Fig. 15.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Remark: In computing space angles, one should take into consideration the fact that the units of the angles in this example are in gons, i.e., 360 = 400 gons. To obtain the values in radians, one needs to multiply the given gon value by π and divide by 200. In addition, when using Eq. 16.30 to get cos(ψ ij ), consider Fig. 17.1.

References

  1. Awange JL (2003) Buchberger algorithm applied to planar lateration and intersection problems. Surv Rev 37:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Awange JL, Grafarend EW (2005) From space angles to point position using sylvester resultant. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten 112:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  3. Awange JL, Grafarend EW, Fukuda Y (2003) Closed form solution of the triple three-dimensional intersection problem. Zeitschrift für Geodaesie, Geoinfornation und Landmanagement 128:395–402

    Google Scholar 

  4. Awange JL, Fukuda Y, Takemoto S, Grafarend EW (2003) Resultants approach to the triple three-dimensional intersection problem. J Geodetic Soc Jpn 49:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  5. Awange JL, Grafarend EW, Fukuda Y (2004) A combinatorial scatter approach to the overdetermined three-dimensional intersection problem. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini 63:235–248

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baarda W (1967) A generalization of the concept strength of the figure. Publications on geodesy, new series, vol 2, no 4. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baarda W (1973) S-transformation and criterion matrices. Netherlands geodetic commission. Publications on geodesy, new series vol 5, no 1. Rijkscommissie voor Geodesie, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grafarend EW (1989) Photogrammetrische Positionierung. Festschrift für Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c Friedrich Ackermann zum 60. Geburtstag, Institut für Photogrammetrie, Univerität Stuttgart, Heft 14, pp 44–55, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grafarend EW (1990) Dreidimensionaler Vorwaertschnitt. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen 115:414–419

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grafarend EW, Mader A (1993) Robot vision based on an exact solution of the threedimensional resection-intersection. In: Linkwitz K, Eisele V, Moenicke H-J (eds) Applications of geodesy to engineering. Symposium No. 108. Spinger, Berlin/Heidelberg/Newyork/London/Paris/Tokyo/ HongKong/Barcelona/Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grafarend EW, Shan J (1997) Closed-form solution of P4P or the three-dimensional resection problem in terms of Möbius barycentric coordinates. J Geod 71:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grafarend EW, Shan J (1997) Closed form solution of the twin P4P or the combined three dimensional resection-intersection problem in terms of Möbius barycentric coordinates. J Geod 71:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanusch T (2010) Texture mapping and true orthophoto generation of 3D objects. Ph.D. at Technical University of Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kahmen H, Faig W (1988) Surveying. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McGlone CJ (2001) Introduction to modern photogrammetry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Awange, J.L., Paláncz, B. (2016). Positioning by Intersection Methods. In: Geospatial Algebraic Computations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25465-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics