Abstract
An ongoing challenge looms for all scholars and decision-makers due to the momentous increase in the breadth of evidence focusing on important decisions. This is typical of the current era dominated by information, access, and participation. Modern information tools to access and exploit this wealth of data, such as online databases, reference management software, and online data repositories, offer a unique opportunity to maximize the scientific and practical yield of available evidence. However, these instruments must be mastered competently, and the resulting pieces of evidence have to be appraised with full awareness of their strengths and weaknesses. Indeed, decision-makers must be able to appropriately use a variety of study designs in alternating settings or for different goals, without limiting their scope to a single one. We cannot narrow our attention to randomized trials or meta-analyses, in as much as we cannot rely solely on case reports. Moving from individuals to studies combining several groups of people and to reviews combining several trials, umbrella reviews and overviews of reviews represent an additional and even more generalizing stage of evidence synthesis. Despite their novelty, their role in the hierarchy of evidence is becoming more and more established. Even in the most challenging settings (e.g., when the evidence base is inconclusive, inconsistent, or incoherent), meta-epidemiologic studies may provide uniquely original and comprehensive perspectives on important issues and may thus indirectly guide both research and practice. Despite the milestones already met in this field of evidence synthesis, further developments are eagerly awaited and will surely enable more careful design, conduct, and reporting of umbrella reviews, overviews of reviews, and meta-epidemiologic studies, hopefully leading to more accurate and prolific results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rowling JK. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. New York: Arthur A. Levine; 2009.
Rifkin J. The age of access: the new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paid-for experience. Los Angeles: Tarcher; 2001.
Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ, editors. Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2014.
Biondi-Zoccai G, editor. Network meta-analysis: evidence synthesis with mixed treatment comparison. Hauppauge: Nova; 2014.
Ramón y Cajal S. Recuerdos de mi Vida. Madrid: Madrid Imprenta y LibrerÃa de N. Moya; 1917.
Piantadosi S, Byar DP, Green SB. The ecological fallacy. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;127:893–904.
Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:215–20.
Egger M, Smith GD, Sterne JA. Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Clin Med. 2001;1:478–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biondi-Zoccai, G. (2016). Conclusion. In: Biondi-Zoccai, G. (eds) Umbrella Reviews. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25653-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25655-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)