Abstract
Organisations with core capabilities in systems engineering solution development often fail to meet delivery expectations in terms of cost and timeframe. This outcome is viewed as an emergent property of the development organisation, which can be considered a Complex Adaptive System (CAS). The context needed to support complex technical innovation within the organisational CAS appears to be in conflict with a hierarchical bureaucracy in development organisations, whose methods and approaches are best suited to simple and complicated contexts. The paper identifies Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) as a framework that may offer a way forward in this space. The paper describes two industry-based case studies that sought to practically apply CLT, and provides insights that may be useful to other industrialists interested in applying CLT within their contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gilbert, D., Yearworth, M., Oliver, L.: A Systems approach to the development and application of technical metrics to systems engineering projects across an enterprise. In: 12th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (2014)
Cilliers, P.: Complexity and Postmodernism Understanding Complex Systems. Routledge, London (1998)
Rittel, H., Webber, M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973)
Yearworth, M., White, L.: The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237, 932–945 (2014)
Hobday, M.: The Project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Res. Policy 29, 871–893 (2000)
Snowden, D., Boone, M.: A leaders framework for decision-making. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85, 68–76 (2007)
Cowper, D., Elphick, J., Kemp, D., Evans, R.: To V of not to V—That MUST be the question knowing when to apply the right approach. In: Proceedings of INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 24(1), pp. 793–814 (2014)
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., McKelvey, B.: Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadersh. Quart. 18(4), 298–318 (2007)
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R.: Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: a meso model. Leadersh. Quart. 20, 631–650 (2009)
Brown, B.: Complexity Leadership: An Overview and Key Limitations (2011). http://integralleadershipreview.com/3962-learner-paper-complexity-leadership/ (14 April 2015)
Havermans, L.: Leadership in project-based organisations: dealing with complex and paradoxical demands. PhD dissertation, VU University, Amsterdam (2014)
Akgun, A., Keskin, H., Byrne, H., Ilhan, O.: Complex adaptive system mechanisms, adaptive management practices, and firm product innovativeness. R&D Manage. 44, 18–41 (2013)
Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y.: The statistical Mechanics of complex product development: empirical and analytical results. Manage. Sci. 53(7), 1127–1145 (2007)
Hazy, J., Uhl-Bien, M.: Towards operationalizing complexity leadership: how generative, administrative, and community-building leadership practices enact organizational outcomes. Leadership 11(1), 79–104 (2013)
Houglum, D.: Myth-busters: traditional and emergent leadership. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation, VOL. 14(2), pp. 25–39 (2012)
IBM: Capitalizing Complexity, Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officer Study, (2010). http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/ceo/ceostudy2010/ (15 April 2015)
Lichtenstein, B., Plowman, D.: The leadership of emergence: a complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. Leadersh. Quart. 20, 617–630 (2009)
Nugent, P., Collar Jr., E.: The hidden perils of addressing complexity with formal process—a philosophical and empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Complex Systems Design and Management, pp. 119–131. Springer, Berlin (2014)
Schreiber, C., Carley, K.: Leadership style and an enabler of organizational complex functioning. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, vol. 8(4), pp. 61–76 (2006)
Van Oorschot, K., Sengupta, K., Akkermans, H., Van Wassenhove, L.: Get fat fast: surviving Stage-Gate® in NPD. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 27(6), 828–839 (2010)
Acknowledgments
Dawn Gilbert is registered on the Engineering Doctorate (EngD) Program in Systems at the University of Bristol. This work is supported by the University of Bristol, UK Systems Centre, the EPSRC funded Industrial Doctorate Centre in Systems (Grant EP/G037353/1) and Thales UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gilbert, D., Shrieves, L., Yearworth, M. (2016). A Case Study of Applying Complexity Leadership Theory in Thales UK. In: Auvray, G., Bocquet, JC., Bonjour, E., Krob, D. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26109-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26109-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26107-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26109-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)