Abstract
A successful implant treatment presupposes an effective osseointegration, which is the direct apposition of bone to the implant surface. The implant surface plays a huge role in the bone response leading to osseointegration. For this reason, evaluation of chemical and physical characteristics is considered important in order to choose the best implant and obtain optimal clinical results. Although it is not clear which specific surface confers a true advantage, there is a general consensus that a roughened surface gives better results compared to machined one.
Bone remodeling after extraction may have an influence on the implant treatment planning and clinical results. Finally, optimal osseointegration mechanisms, good primary stability, and high bone-to-implant contact (BIC) should guarantee the best results at long term.
A relatively recent technology, the piezoelectric surgery, which has the best cutting efficiency on mineralized tissue without overheating the bone, may contribute to reduce the bone trauma before implant placement. Also, it can aid in inserting the implants in difficult clinical situations like the contiguity to delicate structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve or the maxillary sinus.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
T. Albrektsson, A. Wennerberg, Oral implant surfaces: part 1–review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17, 536–543 (2004)
R. Junker, A. Dimakis, M. Thoneick, J.A. Jansen, Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20, 185–206 (2009)
D.M. Dohan Ehrenfest, P.G. Coelho, B.S. Kang, Y.T. Sul, T. Albrektsson, Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol. 28, 198–206 (2010)
C.N. Eliasa, F.A. Rocha, A.L. Nascimento, P.G. Coelho, Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 16, 169–180 (2012)
A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 25, 63–74 (2009)
B. Bhushan. Princ. Appl. Tribol., 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, NY, pp.181–269 (2013)
M.M. Shalabi, A. Gortemaker, M.A. Van’t Hof, J.A. Jansen, N.H. Creugers. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 85, 496–500 (2006)
M. Aljateeli, H.L. Wang, Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration. Implant Dent. 22, 127–132 (2013)
A. Barfeie, J. Wilson, J. Rees, Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration. Bdj. 218, E9–E9 (2015)
I. Abrahamsson, T. Berglundh, Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20, 207–215 (2009)
S. Renvert, I. Polyzois, N. Claffey, How do implant surface characteristics influence periimplant disease? J. Clin. Periodontol. 38, 214–222 (2011)
J. Mouhyi, D.M. Dohan Ehrenfest, T. Albrektsson, The peri-implantitis: implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspects. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14, 170–183 (2012)
A. Apratim, Zirconia in dental implantology: a review. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 5, 147 (2015)
H.J. Wenz, J. Bartsch, S. Wolfart, M. Kern, Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 21, 27–36 (2008)
Z. Özkurt, E. Kazazoğlu, Zirconia dental implants: a literature review. J. Oral Implantol. 37, 367–376 (2011)
A. Monje, H.L. Chan, P. Galindo-Moreno, B. Elnayef, F. Suarez Lopez del amo, F. Wang, H.L. Wang, Alveolar bone architecture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontol. 86, 1–31 (2015). – epub ahead of print
F. Van Der Weijden, F. Dell’Acqua, D.E. Slot, Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 36, 1048–1058 (2009)
W.L. Tan, T.L.T. Wong, M.C.M. Wong, N.P. Lang, A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23, 1–21 (2012)
M. Caneva, L.A. Salata, S.S. de Souza, G. Baffone, N.P. Lang, D. Botticelli, Influence of implant positioning in extraction sockets on osseointegration: histomorphometric analysis in dogs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21, 43–49 (2010)
C.T. Lee, T.S. Chiu, S.K. Chuang, D. Tarnow, J. Stoupel, Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 9, 914–926 (2014)
C.H.F. Hämmerle, M.G. Araújo, M. Simion, Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23, 80–82 (2012)
C. Tomasi et al., Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a multilevel multivariate analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21, 30–36 (2010)
A. Ma, A. Nhm, P. Agt, W. Duncan, M. Esposito, Interventions for replacing missing teeth : alveolar ridge preservation techniques for oral implant site development. Chocrane Database of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (2012).
G. Vittorini Orgeas, M. Clementini, V. De Risi, M. de Sanctis, Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 28, 1049–1061 (2013)
G. Avila-Ortiz, S. Elangovan, K.W.O. Kramer, D. Blanchette, D.V. Dawson, Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res. 93, 950–959 (2014)
M. Willenbacher, B. Al-Nawas, M. Berres, P. W Kämmerer, E. Schiegnitz, The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta-analysis. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. epub ahead of print
S. Jambhekar, F. Kernen, A.S. Bidra, Clinical and Histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 113, 371–382 (2015)
J.G. De Buitrago, G. Avila-Ortiz, S. Elangovan, Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 144, 1349–1357 (2013)
L. Ev, R.A. Uj, Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol. 2000 68, 122–134 (2015)
D. Weng, V. Stock, H. Schliephake, Are socket and ridge preservation techniques at the day of tooth extraction efficient in maintaining the tissues of the alveolar ridge? Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 4, 59–66 (2011)
G. Agarwal, R. Thomas, D. Mehta, Postextraction maintenance of the alveolar ridge: rationale and review. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 33, 320–324 (2012). 326; quiz 327, 336 ST – Postextraction mai
A. Horváth, N. Mardas, L.A. Mezzomo, I.G. Needleman, N. Donos, Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 17, 341–363 (2013)
I. Abrahamsson, T. Berglundh, E. Linder, N.P. Lang, J. Lindhe, Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 15, 381–392 (2004)
N. Donos, M. Retzepi, I. Wall, S. Hamlet, S. Ivanovski, In vivo gene expression profile of guided bone regeneration associated with a microrough titanium surface. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 22, 390–398 (2011)
M.R. Khan, N. Donos, V. Salih, P.M. Brett, The enhanced modulation of key bone matrix components by modified Titanium implant surfaces. Bone 50, 1–8 (2012)
L. Le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, Y. Amouriq, Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. 23, 844–854 (2007)
V. Dhinakarsamy, R. Jayesh, Osseointegration. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 7, 228 (2015)
M. Gasik, A. Braem, A. Chaudhari, J. Duyck, J. Vleugels, Titanium implants with modified surfaces: meta-analysis of in vivo osseointegration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 49, 152–158 (2015)
F. Javed, H.B. Ahmed, R. Crespi, G.E. Romanos, Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: factors of influence and evaluation. Interv. Med. Appl. Sci. 5, 162–167 (2013)
F. Javed, G.E. Romanos, The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J. Dent. 38, 612–620 (2010)
L.R. Walker, G.A. Morris, P.J. Novotny, Implant insertional torque values predict outcomes. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 69, 1344–1349 (2011)
N. Meredith, Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int. J. Prosthodont. 11, 491–501 (1998)
U. Lekholm, G.A. Zarb, in Patient Selection and Preparation, ed. by P.I. Branemark, G..A. Zarb, T. Albrektsson. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry (Hannover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing Company, 1985), pp. 199–209
M. Marquezan, A. Osório, E. Sant’Anna, M.M. Souza, L. Maia, Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23, 767–774 (2012)
L. Molly, Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 17, 124–135 (2006)
R.M. Shadid, N.R. Sadaqah, S.A. Othman, Does the implant surgical technique affect the primary and/or secondary stability of dental implants? a systematic review. Int. J. Dent. 2014(204838) (2014)
M.C. Goiato, D.M. dos Santos, J.F. Santiago, A. Moreno, E.P. Pellizzer, Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 43, 1108–1116 (2014)
E. Sag et al., Comparative assessments, meta-analysis, and recommended guidelines for reporting studies on histomorphometric bone-implant contact in humans. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 28, 1243–1253 (2013)
H.M. Frost, Bone’s mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat. Rec. 275A, 1081–1101 (2003)
M. Chang, V. Chronopoulos, N. Mattheos, Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 4(3), 142–150 (2013)
L.J. Heitz-Mayifiled, B. Schmid, C. Weigel, S. Gerber, D.D. Bosshardt, J. Jonsson, N.P. Lang, J. Jonsson, Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? an experimental study in the dog. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 15, 259–268 (2004)
F. Isidor, Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 17(suppl), 8–18 (2006)
I. Naert, J. Duyck, K. Vandamme, Occlusal overload and bone/implant loss. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23, 95–107 (2012)
B.R. Chrcanovic, M.D. Martins, A. Wennerberg, Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 17, e1–e16 (2013)
A.B. Novaes, A.M. Marcaccini, S.L. Souza, M. Taba, M.F. Grisi, Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs: a histomorphometric study of bone-implant contact. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 18, 391–398 (2003)
R. Palmer, Evidence for survival of implants placed into infected sites is limited. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 12, 187–188 (2012)
J.A. Waasdorp, C.I. Evian, M. Mandracchia, Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J. Periodontol. 81, 801–808 (2010)
J. Jofre, D. Valenzuela, P. Quintana, C. Asenjo-Lobos, Protocol for immediate implant replacement of infected teeth. Implant Dent. 21, 287–294 (2012)
J.C. Álvarez-Camino, E. Valmaseda-Castellón, C. Gay-Escoda, Immediate implants placed in fresh sockets associated to periapical infectious processes. a systematic review. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 18(5), e780–e785 (2013)
I. Sanz, Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23, 67–79 (2012)
M. Labanca, F. Azzola, R. Vinci, L.F. Rodella, Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 46, 265–269 (2008)
T. Vercellotti et al., Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 25, 543–549 (2005)
N. Saulacic, D.D. Bosshardt, S.S. Jensen, R.J. Miron, R. Gruber, D. Buser, Impact of bone graft harvesting techniques on bone formation and graft resorption: a histomorphometric study in the mandible of minipigs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 26, 383–391 (2015)
C. Stacchi, T. Vercellotti, L. Torelli, F. Furlan, R. Di Lenarda, Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 15, 188–197 (2013)
G. Pavlíková et al., Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 40, 451–457 (2011)
C.C.S. Pereira, W.C. Gealh, L. Meorin-Nogueira, I.R. Garcia-Júnior, R. Okamoto, Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: clinical and biological aspects. J. Oral Implantol. 40, 401–408 (2014)
M. Schlee, M. Steigmann, E. Bratu, A.K. Garg, Piezosurgery: basics and possibilities. Implant Dent. 15(4), 334–340 (2006)
M. Donati, D. Botticelli, V. La Scala, C. Tomasi, T. Berglundh, Effect of immediate functional loading on osseointegration of implants used for single tooth replacement. A human histological study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 24, 738–745 (2013)
R.B. Osman et al., Fractured zirconia implants and related implant designs: scanning electron microscopy analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 24, 592–597 (2013)
M.G. Araújo, J. Lindhe, Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J. Clin. Periodontol. 32, 212–218 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iocca, O. (2016). Bone Response to Implants. In: Iocca, O. (eds) Evidence-Based Implant Dentistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26872-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26872-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26870-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26872-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)