Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most feared health condition women face - evoking anxiety and persistent stigma. However, it is no longer the shameful secret that it once was. As a result of the women’s health movement—both individual advocates and a sisterhood of breast cancer organizations—the discourse has evolved from deformity and victimization to feminine strength, economic power, and beauty. Compared to other health conditions, breast cancer has garnered a disproportionate share of media attention, research funding, and legislative action. The movement’s emphasis on staying positive, wearing pink, and joining the cause has not resonated for all. Alternate groups have chosen rather to celebrate women for their activism, encouraging expressions of sadness, and even anger, and to challenge establishment priorities.
The response to breast cancer is as unique to the individual, as this disease is heterogeneous. Cancer of the breast is not a single disease but rather a spectrum of cancers with a range of highly variable presentations, prognoses, and treatments. The current treatment paradigm requires patient choice at nearly every juncture, adding to the pressure, confusion, and daunting degree of personal responsibility its victims feel. Ultimately, the patient’s capacity to cope with the attendant vulnerability and potential feelings of stigma, anticipates both her ability to complete treatment and thrive in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sontag S. Illness as metaphor. New York: Vintage Books; 1979.
Nowinski J. Rethinking societal attitudes about people who get cancer. Huffington Post. 3 Nov 2011.
Patterson JT. The dread disease: cancer and modern American culture, vol. xii. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1987. p. 380.
NCI. 2015. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/research/researchprogramsfunding.
Klawiter M. The biopolitics of breast cancer: changing cultures of disease and activism, vol. xxxi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 397.
Ehrenreich B. Welcome to cancerland. Harper’s Magazine. November, 2001:43–53.
Covelli AM, Baxter NN, Fitch MI, McCready DR, Wright FC. ‘Taking control of cancer’: understanding women’s choice for mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):383–91.
Tuttle TM, Burke EE. Surgical decision making for breast cancer: hitting the sweet spot between paternalism and consumerism. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):351–2.
WCRF. Available from: http://www.wcrf.org/int/cancer-facts-figures/data-specific-cancers/breast-cancer-statistics.
National Cancer Institute, 1 May 2015. Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.gov.
Tichy JR, Lim E, Anders CK. Breast cancer in adolescents and young adults: a review with a focus on biology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(9):1060–9.
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2015; [April 1, 2015].
Gomez-Raposo C, Zambrana Tevar F, Sereno Moyano M, Lopez Gomez M, Casado E. Male breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36(6):451–7.
Agrawal A, Ayantunde AA, Rampaul R, Robertson JF. Male breast cancer: a review of clinical management. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;103(1):11–21.
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008, 1 July 2015. Available from: http://www.genome.gov/24519851.
Denieffe S, Gooney M. A meta-synthesis of women’s symptoms experience and breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(4):424–35.
Jolie A. My medical choice. The New York Times. May 14 2013;14(05):2013.
King MC, Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A. Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award. JAMA. 2014;312(11):1091–2.
Bleyer A, Barr R, Hayes-Lattin B, Thomas D, Ellis C, Anderson B, et al. The distinctive biology of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(4):288–98.
Johnson RH, Chien FL, Bleyer A. Incidence of breast cancer with distant involvement among women in the United States, 1976 to 2009. JAMA. 2013;309(8):800–5.
Dehal A, Abbas A, Johna S. Racial disparities in clinical presentation, surgical treatment and in-hospital outcomes of women with breast cancer: analysis of nationwide inpatient sample database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139(2):561–9.
Dookeran KA, Silva A, Warnecke RB, Rauscher GH. Race/ethnicity and disparities in mastectomy practice in the Breast Cancer Care in Chicago study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(1):66–74.
Wray CJ, Phatak UR, Robinson EK, Wiatek RL, Rieber AG, Gonzalez A, et al. The effect of age on race-related breast cancer survival disparities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2541–7.
Abstract: Women had worse breast cancer mortality regardless of cancer subtype [press release]. AACR, 15 May 2013.
Rosenbaum L. “Misfearing” — culture, identity, and our perceptions of health risks. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(7):595–7.
Day E. The patient with cancer and the family. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(16):883–6.
Hinton J. Bearing cancer. Br J Med Psychol. 1973;46(2):105–13.
Bell K, Ristovski-Slijepcevic S. Cancer survivorship: why labels matter. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(4):409–11.
Peters-Golden H. Breast cancer: varied perceptions of social support in the illness experience. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(4):483–91.
Carter BJ. Surviving breast cancer: a problematic work re-entry. Cancer Pract. 1994;2(2):135–40.
Ross WS. Crusade: the official history of the American Cancer Society, vol. xx. New York: Arbor House; 1987. p. 283.
Lund CC. The doctor, the patient, and the truth. Ann Intern Med. 1946;24:957–8.
Cotlar AM, Dubose JJ, Rose DM. History of surgery for breast cancer: radical to the sublime. Curr Surg. 2003;60(3):329–37.
Maxine D. “After breast surgery”. Good housekeeping. Sept 1954.
Sorlie T. Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(18):2667–75.
Waljee JF, Ubel PA, Atisha DM, Hu ES, Alderman AK. The choice for breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(9):2477–82.
Mukherjee S. The emperor of all maladies: a biography of cancer. Large print ed. Waterville: Thorndike Press; 2010.
Sorlie T. How to personalise treatment in early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47 Suppl 3:S310–1.
Fisher B, Ravdin RG, Ausman RK, Slack NH, Moore GE, Noer RJ. Surgical adjuvant chemotherapy in cancer of the breast: results of a decade of cooperative investigation. Ann Surg. 1968;168(3):337–56.
Crile G. A biological consideration of treatment of breast cancer, vol. xii. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1967. p. 189.
Crile Jr G. Low incidence and morbidity of local recurrence after conservative operations for cancer of the breast. Ann Surg. 1972;175(2):249–53.
Crile G. What women should know about the breast cancer controversy, vol. x. New York: Macmillan; 1973. p. 179.
Crile G. Surgery: your choices, your alternatives, vol. xvi. New York: Delacorte Press/S. Lawrence; 1978. p. 175.
Veronesi U. Conservative treatment of breast cancer: a trial in progress at the Cancer Institute of Milan. World J Surg. 1977;1(3):324–6.
Veronesi U. Rationale and indications for limited surgery in breast cancer: current data. World J Surg. 1987;11(4):493–8.
Fisher B. Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1977;40(1 Suppl):574–87.
Online NCS. The treatment of primary breast cancer: management of local disease. NIH Consens Statement Online 5 Jun 1979 [Cited year month day] 1979;2(5):29–30.
Kushner R. Breast cancer: a personal history and an investigative report, vol. xiii. 1st ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1975. p. 400.
Kevles BH. Naked to the bone: medical imaging in the twentieth century. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1997.
Komen SG. 2015. Available from: http://ww5.komen.org/uploadedFiles/_Komen/Content/About_Us/Financial_Reports/Susan. G Komen 2013 Annual Report.pdf.
Bell K. The breast-cancer-ization of cancer survivorship: implications for experiences of the disease. Soc Sci Med. 2014;110:56–63.
Ehrenreich B. Bright-sided: how the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined America. 1st ed. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2009. p. 235.
Belkin L. How breast cancer became this year’s hottest charity. New York Times Magazine. 22 Dec 1996,
Warner E. Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):1025–32.
Rabin RC. Dense breasts may obscure mammogram results. NY Times. 16 Jun 2014.
Gard CC, Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Taplin SH, Rutter CM. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) mammographic density and implications for breast density reporting legislation. Breast J. 2015.
Yeh VM, Schnur JB, Margolies L, Montgomery GH. Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women’s perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(3):261–6.
Burstein HJ. The fifth “C” is cost: highlights from ASCO 2011. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(7):691.
Brown B. Power of vulnerability. [Internet]. 3 Jan 2011. Podcast. Available from: https://www.ted.com/speakers/brene_brown.
Chang R. How to make hard choices. [Internet]. June 2014. Podcast.
den Heijer M, Seynaeve C, Vanheusden K, Duivenvoorden HJ, Vos J, Bartels CC, et al. The contribution of self-esteem and self-concept in psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2011;20(11):1170–5.
Vodermaier A, Esplen MJ, Maheu C. Can self-esteem, mastery and perceived stigma predict long-term adjustment in women carrying a BRCA1/2-mutation? Evidence from a multi-center study. Fam Cancer. 2010;9(3):305–11.
Ehrenreich B. Smile or die: how positive thinking fooled America and the world. London: Granta; 2009. p. 235.
Ehrenreich B, English D. Complaints and disorders: the sexual politics of sickness. 2nd ed. New York: Feminist Press; 2011. p. 173.
Graves KD, Jensen RE, Canar J, Perret-Gentil M, Leventhal KG, Gonzalez F, et al. Through the lens of culture: quality of life among Latina breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(2):603–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dodge, D.G., Jarowenko, A.M. (2016). Diagnosed with Breast Cancer: Stigmatized or Member of an Empowered Sisterhood?. In: Parekh, R., Childs, E. (eds) Stigma and Prejudice. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27580-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27580-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27578-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27580-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)