Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ((IDCA))

Abstract

It is clear that within the field of archaeological computational modeling, the detection and reduction of uncertainty have played far too marginal a role. To highlight why it is important to grapple with such uncertainty, this concept is here treated from a broader conceptual perspective.

Perhaps most central to this endeavor is that researchers aiming to reconstruct any system, be it past or present, must confront the fact that uncertainty can never be avoided completely, as the world constitutes a place of nearly limitless possibilities. Moreover, in transforming the natural systems in which we live, we affect infinitely more dimensions of the system than we know, leading to numerous unanticipated consequences. This renders the task of analytically reconstructing the past nearly impossible. This paper discusses uncertainty in relation to traditional, reductionist science as well as with respect to complex systems science. Complex systems meet head on the issue of expanding possibilities, seeking to investigate the breadth and depth of these phenomena. In view of all this, it is argued that, rather than attempt the unattainable by reconstructing models of human reality, archaeological modelers would do well to utilize modeling as a “tool for thought” to enhance interpretations of past socio-natural processes and transform theoretical and methodological approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atlan, H. (1992). Self-organising networks: Weak, strong and intentional. The role of their underdetermination. La Nuova Critica Nuova Seria, 19–20, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraclough, G. (1955). History in a changing world. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, T. (1982). Time resources, society and ecology: On the capacity for human interaction in space and time (Vol. 2). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1967). What is history? London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (2014). The idea of history. London: Martino Fine Books (Original Published 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, L. (2011). The dark abyss of time. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. W., & van der Leeuw, S. E. (2009). Biology is only part of the story…. In A. C. Renfrew & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Sapient mind (pp. 33–49). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. W., & van der Leeuw, S. E. (2015). The extension of social relations in time and space during the Palaeolithic. In F. Coward, R. Hosfield, M. Pope, & F. Wenban-Smith (Eds.), Settlement, society and cognition in human evolution (pp. 31–53). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S. E. (2004). Why model? Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 35, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S. E. (2012). Global systems dynamics and policy: Lessons from the distant past. Complexity Economics, 1(2012), 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S. E. (2014). Transforming lessons from the past into lessons for the future. In A. F. Chase & V. Scarborough (Eds.), The resilience and vulnerability of ancient landscapes: Transforming Maya archaeology through IHOPE (Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Vol. 24, pp. 215–231). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S. E., & McGlade, J. (1997). Archaeology: Time, process and structural transformations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S., & Redman, C. L. (1971). Explanation in archaeology: An explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). Calculus of fuzzy restrictions. In L. A. Zadeh, K. S. Fu, K. Tanaka, & M. Shimura (Eds.), Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes (pp. 1–39). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sander van der Leeuw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Leeuw, S. (2016). Uncertainties. In: Brouwer Burg, M., Peeters, H., Lovis, W. (eds) Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Archaeological Computational Modeling. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27833-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27833-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27831-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27833-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics