Skip to main content

Homostability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Bioinformatics
  • 1708 Accesses

Abstract

Once a speciation process has initiated, other factors may replace (G+C)% as a barrier to reproduction (preventing intergenomic recombination between species). This leaves (G+C)% free to assume other roles, such as preventing intragenomic (e.g. intergenic) recombination within a species. Many organisms have “macroisochores,” defined as long segments of relatively uniform (G+C)% that are coinherited with specific sequences of bases. Isochores may facilitate gene duplication. Indeed, each gene has a “homostabilizing propensity” to maintain itself as a “microisochore” of relatively uniform (G+C)%. The protection, afforded by differences in (G+C)%, against inadvertent recombination, facilitates the duplication both of genes and of genomes (speciation). George Williams’ definition of a gene as a unit of recombination, rather than of function, is now seen to have a chemical basis. For organisms living in extreme environments (e.g. thermophiles), natural selection seems to influence values for (G+C)% less than for (A+G)%.

Genetic information is ‘written’ by a variation in sequence on the one hand, and the physical stability of the double-stranded structure is determined by the base composition on the other hand. … DNA is found to consist of a number of homostability regions which come from homogenous base sequences consisting of 500 base pairs or more. … Biologically, it is hard … to believe that such regional homostability originates in a fundamental characteristic of the genetic code itself. It is quite plausible … that the homostability region plays an important part somewhere in the biological process within which the DNA is closely related. If so, then the evolutionary selective force can be considered to have fixed such regions of DNA. From the size of the homostability region, recombination might be one possible process which is aided by it. In any case, the wobble bases [in codon third position s] must give the necessary redundancy to make a homostability region without spoiling the biological meaning of the genetic code.

Akiyoshi Wada et al. (1975) [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wada A, Tachibana H, Gotoh O, Takanami M (1975) Long range homogeneity of physical stability in double-stranded DNA. Nature 263:439–440 [Some third codon position bases are deemed to “wobble” to better fit the codon to its complementary anticodon sequence.]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forsdyke DR, Mortimer JR (2000) Chargaff’s legacy. Gene 261:127–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodin SN, Parkhomchuk DV (2004) Position-associated GC asymmetry of gene duplicates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 59:372–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuo K, Clay O, Kunzler P, Georgiev O, Urbanek P, Schaffner W (1994) Short introns interrupting the Oct-2 POU domain may prevent recombination between POU family genes without interfering with potential POU domain ‘shuffling’ in evolution. Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler 375:675–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Newgard CB, Nakano K, Hwang PK, Fletterick RJ (1986) Sequence analysis of the cDNA encoding human liver glycogen phosphorylase reveals tissue-specific codon usage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 83:8132–8136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore R C, Purugganan MD (2003) The early stages of duplicate gene evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:15682–15687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Z, Kishino H (2004) Genomic background drives the divergence of duplicated Amylase genes at synonymous sites in Drosophila. Molecular Biology & Evolution 21:222–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montoya-Burgos JI, Boursot P, Galtier N (2003) Recombination explains isochores in mammalian genomes. Trends in Genetics 19: 128–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rozen S, Skaletsky H, Marszalek JD, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Waterston RH, Wilson RK, Page DC (2003) Abundant gene conversion between arms of palindromes in human and ape chromosomes. Nature 423:873–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skalka A, Burgi E, Hershey AD (1968) Segmental distribution of nucleotides in the DNA of bacteriophage lambda. Journal of Molecular Biology 34:1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vizard DL, Ansevin AT (1976) High resolution thermal denaturation of DNA: thermalites of bacteriophage DNA. Biochemistry 15:741–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bibb MJ, Findlay PR, Johnson MW (1984) The relationship between base composition and codon usage in bacterial genes and its use for the simple and reliable identification of protein-coding sequences. Gene 30:157–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wada A, Suyama A (1985) Third letters in codons counterbalance the (G+C) content of their first and second letters. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 188:291–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Kasif S, Cantor CR, Broude NE (2004) GC/AT-content spikes as genomic punctuation marks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:16855–16860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudla G, Helwak A, Lipinski L (2004) Gene conversion and GC-content evolution in mammalian Hsp70. Molecular Biology & Evolution 21:1438–1444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsdyke DR (2009) Scherrer and Josts’ symposium. The gene concept in 2008. Theory in Biosciences 128:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forsdyke DR (2011) The selfish gene revisited: reconciliation of the Williams-Dawkins and conventional definitions. Biological Theory 5:246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalmus H (1950) A cybernetical aspect of genetics. Journal of Heredity 41: 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 24–25. [WD Hamilton was also an important contributor to the selfish gene concept.]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun W, Mao C, Liu F, Seeman NC (1998) Sequence dependence of branch migratory minima. Journal of Molecular Biology 282:59–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karymov MA, Boganov A, Lyubchenko YL (2008) Single molecule fluorescence analysis of branch migration of Holliday junctions: effect of DNA sequence. Biophysical Journal 95:1239–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Galtier N, Lobry JR (1997) Relationships between genomic G+C content, RNA secondary structures, and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44:632–636 [This paper is much cited, but there are serious misinterpretations of the data.]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lambros R, Mortimer JR, Forsdyke DR (2003) Optimum growth temperature and the base composition of open reading frames in prokaryotes. Extremophiles 7:443–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oshima T, Hamasaki N, Uzawa T, Friedman SM (1990) Biochemical functions of unusual polyamines found in the cells of extreme thermophiles. In: Goldembeg SH, Algranati ID (eds) The Biology and Chemistry of Polyamines. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Friedman SM, Malik M, Drlica K (1995) DNA supercoiling in a thermotolerant mutant of Escherichia coli. Molecular & General Genetics 248:417–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forsdyke, D.R. (2016). Homostability. In: Evolutionary Bioinformatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28755-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics