Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pen Pals: An Examination of Human–Animal Interaction as an Outlet for Healthy Masculinity in Prison

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Men and Their Dogs

Abstract

This chapter discusses interactions between dogs and men who may be especially primed for the benefits of human–animal interaction (HAI) and at the same time a potentially risky group to entrust animals to—men in prison. After describing male imprisonment and the impact on expressed masculinity, prison-based animal programs are introduced and discussed. Following this review, an empirical study is described, which examined a dog training program in a men’s prison. Researchers examined specific behaviors emitted by inmates when interacting with dogs, focusing on men in the general population. Findings are discussed in the context of prisonization and toxic masculinity. This chapter concludes with recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All procedures were subject to full review and were approved by the Virginia Tech Institutional Review Board for Research with Human Subjects and the Human Subjects Review Board for the Virginia Department of Corrections.

References

  • Adams, K. (2001, March/April). 2nd chances. Backstretch, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. M., Blascovich, J., Tomaka, J., & Kelsey, R. M. (1991). Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 582–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, F. J. (2012). The relationship of violence to gender role conflict and conformity to masculine norms in a forensic sample. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 20(3), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (2007). Animal assisted activates for at-risk and incarcerated children and young adults: An introductory ethnography of five programs. Paper presented at the National Technology Assessment Workshop on Animal Assisted Programs for Youth at Risk, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazina, C. (1997). The fear of the feminine in the Western psyche and the masculine task of disidentification. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 6, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazina, C. (2003). The cultural myth of masculinity. Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowen, M. (2001, January 16). In prison, a happier trail. Boston Globe, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71, 691-711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Education and correctional populations. Special Report NCJ 195670. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008). Census of state and federal correctional facilities, 2005. Special Report NCJ 222182. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Parents in prison and their minor children. Special Report NCJ 222984. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2014a). Correctional populations in the United States, 2013. Special Report NCJ 248479. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2014b). Recidivism of prisoners release in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Special Report NCJ 244205. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustad, L. K. (1990). Prison programs involving animals. In L. K. Bustad (Ed.), Compassion, our last great hope (pp. 72–73). Renton, WA: Delta Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, T. (2000). Newjack: Guarding sing-sing. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, B., & Morton, L. L. (2003). Children with pets do not show higher empathy: A challenge to current views. Anthrozoös, 16(4), 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A., Brookes, L., Carter, B., Larman, G., & Jackson, D. (2013). Stigma, health and incarceration: Turning the tide for children with a parent in prison. Journal of Child Health Care, 17(1), 3–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, C. (2005). Humanizing prisons with animals: A closer look at “Cell Dogs” and horse programs in correctional institutions. The Journal of Correctional Education, 56(1), 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. J. (2005). Prison, fathers, and identity: A theory of how incarceration affects men’s paternal identity. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men as Fathers, 3(3), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, A. K., Geller, E. S., & Fortney, E. (2007). Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, A. K., Letson, E., & Krog, L. (2015). Development of the human-animal interaction scale: An instrument to quantify human-animal interaction. Poster presented to the International Society on Anthrozoology, Saratoga Springs, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, L., & Delisle, E. (2012). Animal-assisted literacy: A supportive environment for constrained and unconstrained learning. Childhood Education, 88(2), 102–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, G. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86(4), 407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, G. (2011). Animal programs in prison: A comprehensive assessment. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. C. (1978). Therapeutic metaphors: Helping others through the looking glass. USA: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (1997). Psychology and the limits to prison pain: Confronting the coming crisis in eighth amendment law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(4), 499–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., Banks, W., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H., Betchart, N., & Pittman, R. (1991). Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes towards animals. Anthrozoös, 4(3), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1998). Turing points in the lives of young, inner-city men forgoing destructive criminal behaviors: A qualitative study. Social Work Research, 22, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J., & Cressey, D. R. (1962). Thieves, convicts, and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiselica, M. S., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2010). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male strengths: The positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, & Training, 47(3), 276–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupers, T. (2001a). Psychotherapy with men in prison. In G. Brooks & G. Good (Eds.), A new handbook of counseling and psychotherapy approaches for men: A comprehensive guide to setting, problems, and treatment approaches (pp. 170–184). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupers, T. A. (2001b). Rape and the prison code. In D. Sabo, T. A. Kupers, & W. London (Eds.), Prison masculinities (pp. 111–117). Philadelphia, PA: Temple Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupers, T. A. (2005). Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 713–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1998). Desperately seeking language: Understanding, assessing, and treating normative male alexithymia. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneymaker, J. M., & Strimple, E. O. (1991). Animals and inmates: A sharing companionship behind bars. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16(3–4), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, E. (1994). The fear of the feminine and other essays on feminine psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogloff, J. R. (2002). Offender rehabilitation: From “nothing works” to what next? Australian Psychologist, 37(3), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of men’s gender role conflict using the gender role conflict scale: New research paradigms and clinical implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 358–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men’s gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. A new psychology of men, 164–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men's fear of femininity. Sex roles, 14(5–6), 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paluch, J. J. (2004). A life for a life: Life imprisonment: America’s other death penalty. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. S. (2000). Empathy with animals and with humans: Are they linked? Anthrozoös, 13(4), 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. (2001). Cultural construction of manhood in prison. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 2(1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., & Masciadrelli, B. P. (2004). Paternal involvement by US residential fathers: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (4th ed., pp. 222–271). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. L. (1987). The companion animal bonding scale: Internal reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 60, 743–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. L. (1988). The companion animal semantic differential: Long and short form reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(1), 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. L. (1979). The impact of social anchorage on prisonization. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1694A. (UMI No. 79–19, 101).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabo, D., Kupers, T. A., & London, W. (2001). Gender and the politics of punishment. In D. Sabo, T. A. Kupers, & W. London (Eds.), Prison Masculinities (pp. 3–18). Philadelphia, PA: Temple Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiz, R., & Koralewicz, L. (2003). Evaluation research project on New Leash on Life program: Final report. CBR Youth Connect/Colorado Boys Ranch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, E. O. (2003). A history of prison inmate-animal interaction programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers-McCabe, H. M., Van Voorhees, E., & Fournier, A. K. (2005). Prison PUP: An examination of the human-animal bond in an American prison. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. G. (2007). The experiences of offenders in a prison canine program. Federal Probation, 71(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Department of Corrections. (2015). Pen Pals. Retrieved August 13, 2015, from https://vadoc.virginia.gov/offenders/institutions/programs/penpals.shtm

  • Walsh, P. G., & Mertin, P. G. (1994). The training of pets as therapy dogs in a women’s prison: A pilot study. Anthrozoös, 7(2), 124–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced inmates prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, College of Health Sciences & Human Ecology, Bemidji State University, 1500 Birchmont Dr. NE, Bemidji, MN, 56601, USA

    Angela K. Fournier

Authors
  1. Angela K. Fournier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela K. Fournier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA

    Christopher Blazina

  2. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

    Lori R. Kogan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fournier, A.K. (2016). Pen Pals: An Examination of Human–Animal Interaction as an Outlet for Healthy Masculinity in Prison. In: Blazina, C., Kogan, L. (eds) Men and Their Dogs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30097-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation