Skip to main content

Miyazawa-Jernigan Contact Potentials and Carter-Wolfenden Vapor-to-Cyclohexane and Water-to-Cyclohexane Scales as Parameters for Calculating Amino Acid Pair Distances

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 9656))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The difference between amino acid chemical properties that correlate to the exchangeability of protein sequence residues is often analysed using approach proposed by Grantham (1974). His difference formula, i.e., matrix, for calculating the distances between amino acid pairs of the protein consists of three essential amino acid physicochemical properties – composition, polarity and volume, that are significantly correlated to the substitution frequencies of the protein residues. Miyata et al. (1979) re-evaluated this concept, and showed that the degree of amino acid difference is just as adequately explained by only two physicochemical factors, volume and polarity. Miyazawa-Jernigan relative partition/hydrophobic energies (ε = Δe ir ), and Carter-Wolfenden vapor-to-cyclohexane scale (G v>c = ΔGv>c) are two alternative amino acid physicochemical parameters that are strongly correlated to their polarity and volume/mass, respectively. We show that the Miyazawa-Jernigan residue contact potential could be used instead of the Grantham polarity and composition parameters to derive an updated Miyata matrix. This substitution permits Miyata matrix correction for the amino acid parameters of: contact energies, repulsive packing energies, secondary structure energies, and Grantham’s composition property. Distance values calculated between both (classic and updated) Miyata matrices exhibit a strong correlation of r = 0.91. The possibility of analyzing residue distances based on Carter-Wolfenden water-to-cyclohexane (w > c) and vapor-to-cyclohexane (v > c) scales instead of the amino acid polarity and volume parameters is also discussed, and a new distance matrix is derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grantham, R.: Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185, 862–864 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miyata, T., Miyazawa, S., Yasunaga, T.: Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 12, 219–236 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miyazawa, S., Jernigan, R.L.: Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18, 534–552 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyazawa, S., Jernigan, R.L.: Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins 34, 49–68 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leelananda, S.P., Feng, Y., Gniewek, P., Kloczkowski, A., Jernigan, R.L.: Statistical contact potentials in protein coarse-grained modeling: from pair to multi-body Potentials. In: Kolinski, A. (ed.) Multiscale Approaches to Protein Modeling, pp. 127–157. Springer, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, C.W., Wolfenden, R.: tRNA acceptor stem and anticodon bases form independent codes related to protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7484–7488 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer, O., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D.: PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 49, 9 (2001), http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

  9. Štambuk, N., Konjevoda, P.: Prediction of secondary protein structure with binary coding patterns of amino acid and nucleotide physicochemical properties. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 92, 123–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyte, J., Doolittle, R.F.: A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105–132 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose, G.D., Geselowitz, A.R., Lesser, G.J., Lee, R.H., Zehfus, M.H.: Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science 229, 834–838 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Radzicka, A., Wolfenden, R.: Comparing the polarities of the amino acids: side-chain distribution coefficients between the vapor phase, cyclohexane, 1-octanol, and neutral aqueous solution. Biochemistry 27, 1664–1670 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, B., Richards, F.M.: The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55, 379–400 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chothia, C.: The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 105, 1–12 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasegawa, M., Miyata, T.: On the antisymmetry of the amino acid code table. Orig. Life. 10, 265–270 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jayaram, B.: Beyond the wobble: the rule of conjugates. J. Mol. Evol. 45, 704–705 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hodgman, T.C., French, A., Westhead. D.R.: Bioinformatics. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pevsner, J.: Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Green, D.V.S., Segall, M.: Chemoinformatics in lead optimization. In: Bajorath, J. (ed.) Chemoinformatics for Drug Discovery, pp. 149–168. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The support of the Croatian Institute for Toxicology and Anti-Doping, and the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports is gratefully acknowledged (grant No. 098-0982929-2524).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikola Štambuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Štambuk, N., Konjevoda, P., Manojlović, Z. (2016). Miyazawa-Jernigan Contact Potentials and Carter-Wolfenden Vapor-to-Cyclohexane and Water-to-Cyclohexane Scales as Parameters for Calculating Amino Acid Pair Distances. In: Ortuño, F., Rojas, I. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9656. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31743-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31744-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics