Skip to main content

From Winged Lions to Frozen Embryos, Neomorts and Human-Animal Cybrids: The Functions of Law in the Symbolic Mediation of Biomedical Hybrids

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw

Part of the book series: Legisprudence Library ((LEGIS,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter argues that legal discourse offers a vital contribution to the social-cultural symbolisation of biomedical hybrids. Products of biomedical developments, such as human immortal cellines, three parent babies, frozen embryos and synthetic human tissues, appear to be questioning the founding frameworks, categories and distinctions of our moral experience. The main reason is that these hybrid entities go beyond the categorical distinctions between, for example, person and thing, alive and dead, male and female and natural and artificial. Under these circumstances, law’s intricate system of categories and constructions can become of vital importance in the collective effort to come to a cultural-symbolic understanding of these novel entities. In this chapter, law’s symbolic functions in this process are elucidated, analysed and compared to other possible approaches.

“The trouble concerns the fact that the ‘truths’ of the modern scientific world view, though they can be demonstrated in mathematical formulas and proved technologically, will no longer lend themselves to normal expression in speech and thought. The moment these truths are spoken of conceptually and coherently, the resulting statements will be ‘not perhaps as meaningless as a “triangular circle,” but much more so than a “winged lion”’ (Erwin Schrödinger). We do not yet know whether this situation is final. But it could be that we, who are earth-bound creatures and have begun to act as though we were dwellers of the universe, will forever be unable to understand, that is, to think and speak about the things which nevertheless we are able to do.”(Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a previous article I have analysed the symbolic functions of law in light of global reproductive markets and their accompanying streams of reproductive tourism (see Van Beers 2015).

  2. 2.

    See for instance Article 13 Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Council of Europe): “An intervention seeking to modify the human genome may only be undertaken for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic purposes and only if its aim is not to introduce any modification in the genome of any descendants.”

  3. 3.

    See Zippi Brand Frank’s documentary with the same title on the phenomenon of worldwide reproductive markets, in which sperm, egg cells and surrogate mothers are all commercially available (Google Baby, see <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1490675/>).

  4. 4.

    Intersex persons are born with biological characteristics that do not fit squarely in the traditional understanding of male and female.

  5. 5.

    Transsexual persons are born with clear traditionally male or female characteristics, but nevertheless strongly identify with the other sex. Often, though not always, this identification is accompanied by a longing for a sex reassignment.

  6. 6.

    Christine Goodwin v United Kingdom [GC], no 28957/95 (Grand Chamber, 11 July 2002).

  7. 7.

    For instance in Australia, Germany and New-Zealand. In Thailand the third gender may even receive recognition within the Constitution, as the Constitution Drafting Committee will include references to the third gender in its new draft of the Constitution (see http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/16/world/third-gender-thailand/).

  8. 8.

    For example, the Dutch government delegates the regulation of assisted reproduction to a large extent to the medical profession itself. For instance, rules on postmenopausal pregnancies can only be found in professional guidelines, established by the Dutch association of gynaecologists and obstetricians.

  9. 9.

    For instance, according to the organisation Transgender Europe in 2014 21 countries in Europe still required by law that transgender people undergo sterilisation before their gender identity is recognised (see http://www.tgeu.org/sites/default/files/Trans_Map_Index_2014.pdf). Nevertheless, a trend towards legal reform in this area can be detected throughout Europe, with Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands recently abandoning surgery requirements (see Saner 2014).

  10. 10.

    “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

  11. 11.

    Habermas refers to this process as an ‘anticipatory socialisation of unborn life’. As he writes, the parents do not only talk about the child that is growing in utero, in a certain way they also already communicate with it (Habermas 2003, 35).

  12. 12.

    Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Council of Europe), recital.

  13. 13.

    Article 1 Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (UNESCO).

  14. 14.

    For example, rejection of the concept of brain death is regarded as one of the three main arguments from Dutch family members of the deceased against organ donation (see Den Hartogh 2003: 60).

  15. 15.

    In Belgium and the Netherlands, the combination of euthanasia and postmortal organ donation is currently emerging.

  16. 16.

    For instance, in the Netherlands it has recently become possible to legally descend from two women (see Pessers 2013).

  17. 17.

    As Naffine correctly writes about the legal sex difference: “There is no third term, apart from ‘it’, but this would drive the person into property which is why men and women are never described this way. ‘It’ debases” (Naffine 2004: 637).

  18. 18.

    Christine Goodwin v United Kingdom [GC], no 28957/95 (Grand Chamber, 11 July 2002).

  19. 19.

    Vo v. France [GC], no 53924/00 (Grand Chamber, 8 July 2004).

  20. 20.

    Evans v. United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05 (Grand Chamber, 10 April 2007); S.H. v. Austria no 57813/00 [GC] (Grand Chamber, 3 November 2011).

  21. 21.

    Elberte v. Latvia, no 61243/08 (Fourth Section, 13 January 2015).

  22. 22.

    See Den Hartogh (2003): 60.

  23. 23.

    See for further reflection on the distinction between life as zoè and life as bios: Arendt (1998: 96–97); Agamben (1998: 9–14).

  24. 24.

    See most recently Elberte v. Latvia, no 61243/08 (Fourth Section, 13 January 2015).

  25. 25.

    With a term borrowed from Willard Gaylin (see Gaylin 1974).

  26. 26.

    Syn- is for ‘together’ and bol is derived from ballein which is ‘to throw’.

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer. Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beers, Britta van, Luigi Corrias, and Wouter Werner (eds.). 2014. Humanity across international law and biolaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, Britta van. 2015. Is Europe ‘giving in to baby markets’? Reproductive tourism in Europe and the gradual erosion of existing legal limits to reproductive markets. Medical Law Review 2015: 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc. 2004. La Condition Foetale. Une Sociologie de l’Engendrement et de l’Avortement. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A., D. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice. Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burg, Wibren van der. 2001. The expressive and communicative functions of law, especially with regard to moral issues. Law and Philosophy 20: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1972. An essay on man. An introduction to a philosophy of culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Playing God. Genes, clones, and luck. In: Sovereign virtue. The theory and practice of equality, ed. R. Dworkin, 427–452. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Bernard. 1999. La Personne en Danger. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Bernard. 2007. Quand les juristes inventent le réel. La fabulation juridique. Paris: Hermann Éditeurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagundes, D. 2001. What we talk about when we talk about persons. The language of a legal fiction. Harvard Law Review 114: 1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylin, W. 1974. Harvesting the dead. Harper’s, September 23..

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local knowledge. Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Mary Ann. 1987. Abortion and divorce in western law. American failures, European challenges. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. 1983. Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • den Hartogh, G. 2003. Gift of bijdrage? Over morele aspecten van orgaandonatie. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld, W.N. 1923. Fundamental legal conceptions applied in legal reasoning and other legal essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacub, Marcela. 2002. Le crime était presque sexuel. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, Hans. 1974. Against the stream. Comments on the definition and redefinition of death. In Philosophical essays. From ancient creed to technological man, ed. H. Jonas, 132–140. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klink, Bart va. 2005. An effective-historical view on the symbolic working of law. In Social and symbolic effects of legislation under the rule of law, ed. N. Zeegers, W. Witteveen, and B. van Klink. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrusse-Riou, C. 2007. Écrits de Bioéthique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France/Quadrige.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1997. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politiques de la nature. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, F.H. 1957. The creative use of legal concepts. New York University Law Review 32: 909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lembcke, Oliver W. 2013. Human dignity – A constituent and constituted legal principle. Some perspectives of a German discourse. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 129 (Human Dignity as the Foundation of Law), 137:207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, H.S. 1908. Ancient law. Its connection with the early history of society and its relation to modern ideas. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naffine, Ngaire. 2004. Our legal lives as men, women and persons. Legal Studies 21: 621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessers, Dorien. 2013. De Terugkeer van de Bastaard. Nederlands Juristenblad 88: 2189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. 2007. Reflections on the just. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raus, K., S. Sterckx, and F. Mortier. 2012. Continuous deep sedation at the end of life and the natural death hypothesis. Bioethics 26(6): 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, D. 1994. Sujet de chair et sujet de droit. La justice face au transsexualisme. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael. 2007. The case against perfection. Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner, Emine. 2014. Europe’s terrible trans rights record. Will Denmark’s new law spark change? The Guardian 1 September. http://www.theguardian.com/society/shortcuts/2014/sep/01/europe-terrible-trans-rights-record-denmark-new-law. Accessed 24 Feb 2015.

  • Shah, S.K. and F.D. Miller. 2010. Can we handle the truth? Legal fictions in the determination of death. American Journal of Law & Medicine 36: 540–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, M. 2006. Taming Monsters. The cultural domestication of new technologies. Technology in Society 8: 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R. 1995. On the expressive function of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144: 2024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, Alain. 2007. Homo Juridicus. On the anthropological function of law. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Y. 1998a. Le sujet de droit, la personne et la nature. Sur la critique contemporaine du sujet de droit. Le Débat 100: 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Y. 1998b. Introduction du dossier ‘Le droit et la nature des choses’. Enquête 7: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog, Robert D., Franklin G. Miller, and Scott D. Halpern. 2013. The dead-donor rule and the future of organ donation. The New England Journal of Medicine 369: 1287–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Britta van Beers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Beers, B. (2016). From Winged Lions to Frozen Embryos, Neomorts and Human-Animal Cybrids: The Functions of Law in the Symbolic Mediation of Biomedical Hybrids. In: van Klink, B., van Beers, B., Poort, L. (eds) Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw. Legisprudence Library, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33363-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33365-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics