Abstract
Huskey shows how rapid advances in brain-imaging technologies have allowed for the systematic investigation of the mind/brain and researchers are increasingly utilizing these methods to examine the neural basis of human communication behavior. The chapter introduces communication scholars interested in conducting functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations to psychophysiological interaction analyses (PPI). Huskey discusses the methodological particulars associated with using a PPI analysis to test the synchronization theory of flow before concluding with a broader outlook on applications to communication theory and research. Specifically, the chapter discusses how investigations of neural connectivity can be used for theoretical falsification, conceptual refinement, and distinguishing constructs that have similar phenomenological characteristics and behavioral outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashby, F. (2011) Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Bullmore, E. and Sporns, O. (2012) The Economy of Brain Network Organization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13(5): 336–49.
Bassett, D. and Gazzaniga, M. (2011) Understanding Complexity in the Human Brain. Tzrends in Cognitive Sciences 15(5): 200–9.
Bush, K. and Cisler, J. (2013). Decoding Neural Events from fMRI BOLD Signal: A Comparison of Existing Approaches and Development of a New Algorithm. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 31(6): 976–89.
Chee, M., Venkatraman, V., Westphal, C., et al. (2003) Comparison of Block and Event-related fMRI Designs in Evaluating the Word-frequency Effect. Human Brain Mapping 18(3): 186–93.
Chu, C., Tanaka, N., Diaz, J., et al. (2015) EEG Functional Connectivity is Partially Predicted by Underlying White Matter Connectivity. NeuroImage 108: 23–33.
Chua, H., Ho, S., Jasinska, A., et al. (2011) Self-related Neural Response to Tailored Smoking-cessation Messages Predicts Quitting. Nature Neuroscience 14(4): 426–7.
Cisler, J., Bush, K. and Steele, J. (2014) A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Detecting Context-modulated Functional Connectivity in fMRI. NeuroImage 84:1042–52.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., et al. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum).
Craighead, B., Huskey, R. and Weber, R. (2015) Video Game Articles addiction: What Can We Learn From a Media Neuroscience Perspective? Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences 7(3): 119–31.
CsÃkszentmihályi, M. (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (New York: HarperCollins).
Davison, E., Schlesinger, K., Bassett, D., et al. (2015) Brain Network Adaptability Across Task States. PLoS Computational Biology 11(1): 1–14.
DeYoe, E., Bandettini, P., Neitz, J., et al. (1994) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) of the Human Brain. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 54(2): 171–87.
Falk, E., Berkman, E. and Lieberman, M. (2012) From Neural Responses to Population Behavior: Neural Focus Group Predicts Population-level Media Effects. Psychological Science 23(5): 439–45.
Falk, E., Rameson, L., Berkman, E., et al. (2009) The Neural Correlates of Persuasion: A Common Network Across Cultures and Media. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(11): 2447–59.
Fodor, J. (1983) The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Friston, K. (2011) Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review. Brain Connectivity 1(1): 13–36.
Friston, K., Buechel, C., Fink, G., et al. (1997) Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging. NeuroImage 6(3): 218–29.
Friston, K., Mechelli, A., Turner, R., et al. (2000) Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics. NeuroImage 12(5): 466–77.
Gentile, D. (2009) Pathological Video-game Use Among Youth Ages 8 to 18: A National Study. Psychological Science 20(5): 594–602.
Gitelman, D., Penny, W., Ashburner, J., et al. (2003) Modeling Regional and Psychophysiologic Interactions in fMRI: The Importance of Hemodynamic Deconvolution. NeuroImage 19(1): 200–7.
Gu, S., Pasqualetti, F., Cieslak, M., et al. (2015) Controllability of Structural Brain Networks. Nature Communications 6(8414): 1–10.
Harrison, L. and Friston, K. (2004) Effective Connectivity. In J. Ashburner, K. J. Friston, and W. D. Penny (Eds.), Human Brain Function. 2nd ed. (San Diego: Academic Press), pp. 1019–47.
Hermundstad, A., Bassett, D., Brown, K., et al. (2013) Structural Foundations of Resting-state and Task-based Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(15): 6169–74.
Hermundstad, A., Brown, K., Bassett, D., et al. (2014) Structurally-constrained Relationships Between Cognitive States in the Human brain. PLoS Computational Biology 10(5): 1–9.
Huettel, S., Song, A. and McCarthy, G. (2009) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2nd ed. (Sunderland: Sinauer Associates).
Huskey, R., Mangus, M., Yoder, C., et al. (2014) The Neural Correlates of Flow Experiences During Video Game Play. Paper presented at the 64th annual conference of the International Communication Association (Seattle, USA).
Klasen, M., Weber, R., Kircher, T., et al. (2012) Neural Contributions to Flow Experience During Video Game Playing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7(4): 485–95.
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., et al. (2009). Life in the Network: The Coming Age of Computational Social Science. Science 323(5915): 721–3.
Logothetis, N. and Pfeuffer, J. (2004) On the Nature of the BOLD fMRI Contrast Mechanism. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22(10): 1517–31.
Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., Augath, M. et al. (2001) Neurophysiological Investigation of the Basis of the fMRI Signal. Nature 412(6843): 150–7.
Lohmann, G., Erfurth, K., Müller, K., et al. (2012) Critical Comments on Dynamic Causal Modelling. NeuroImage 59(3): 2322–9.
McLaren, D., Ries, M., Xu, G., et al. (2012) A Generalized Form of Context-dependent Psychophysiological Interactions (gPPI): A Comparison to Standard Approaches. NeuroImage 61(4): 1277–86.
Miller, M., Donovan, C.-L., Bennett, C., et al. (2012) Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and Strategy Predict Similarities in the Patterns of Brain Activity Between Individuals. NeuroImage 59(1): 83–93.
Norman, K., Polyn, S., Detre, G., et al. (2006) Beyond Mind-reading: Multi-voxel Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(9): 424–30.
O’Reilly, J., Woolrich, M., Behrens, T., et al. (2012) Tools of the Trade: Psychophysiological Interactions and Functional Connectivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7(5): 604–9.
Petersen, S. and Sporns, O. (2015) Brain Networks and Cognitive Architectures. Neuron 88(1): 207–19.
Ramsay, I., Yzer, M., Luciana, M., et al. (2013) Affective and Executive Network Processing Associated with Persuasive Antidrug Messages. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 25(7): 1136–47.
Richardet, R., Chappelier, J.-C., Telefont, M., et al. (2015) Large-scale Extraction of Brain Connectivity from the Neuroscientific Literature. Bioinfomatics 31(10) 1640–7.
Seelig, D., Wang, A.-L., Jaganathan, K., et al. (2014) Low Message Sensation Health Promotion Videos Are Better Remembered and Activate Areas of the Brain Associated with Memory Encoding. PloS One 9(11): 1–10.
Seung, S. (2012) Connectome: How the Brain’s Wiring Makes Us Who We Are (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Trade).
Sherry, J. (2015) The Complexity Paradigm for Studying Human Communication: A Summary and Integration of Two Fields. Review of Communication Research 3(1): 22–54.
Stanisor, L., van der Togt, C., Pennartz, C., et al. (2013) A Unified Selection Signal for Attention and Reward in Primary Visual Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(22): 9136–41.
Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. New York: Hyperion.
Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., et al. (2014) Neural Correlates of Experimentally Induced Flow Experiences. NeuroImage 86(1): 194–202.
Vezich, S., Falk, E. and Lieberman, M. (2016) Persuasion Neuroscience: New Potential to Test Dual Process Theories. In E. Harmon-Jones and M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Social Neuroscience: Biological Approaches to Social Psychology (New York: Psychological Press).
Wang, H., Benar, C., Quilichini, P., et al. (2014) A Systematic Framework for Functional Connectivity Measures. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8(405): 1–22.
Weber, R., Tamborini, R., Westcott-Baker, A., et al. (2009) Theorizing Flow and Media Enjoyment as Cognitive Synchronization of Attentional and Reward Networks. Communication Theory 19(4): 397–422.
Weber, R., Alicea, B., Huskey, R., et al. (2014a) The Dynamics of Attention in Video game Environments: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Paper presented at the 64th annual conference of the International Communication Association (Seattle, USA).
Weber, R., Huskey, R., Mangus, J., et al. (2014b) Neural Predictors of Message Effectiveness During Counterarguing in Anti-drug Campaigns. Communication Monographs 82(1): 4–30.
Weber, R., Eden, A., Huskey, R., et al. (2015a) Bridging Media Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Media Psychology 27(3): 146–56.
Weber, R., Mangus, J. and Huskey, R. (2015b) Brain Imaging in Communication Research: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Evaluating fMRI Studies. Communication Methods and Measures 9(1–2): 5–29.
Weber, R., Huskey, R., and Craighead, B. (2017) Flow Experiences and Well-being: A Media Neuroscience Perspective. In M. B. Oliver and L. Reinecke (Eds.), Handbook of Media Use and Well-being: International Perspectives on Theory and Research on Positive Media Effects (New York: Routledge), pp. 183–96.
Wood, R. and Griffiths, M. (2007) Time Loss Whilst Playing Video Games: Is There a Relationship to Addictive Behaviours? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 5(2): 141–9.
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R., Nichols, T., et al. (2011) Large-scale Automated Synthesis of Human Functional Neuroimaging Data. Nature Methods 8(8): 665–70.
Acknowledgments
The theoretical rationale and methodological procedures for assessing neural connectivity have been a hot topic of discussion within the Media Neuroscience Lab (http://medianeuroscience.org). Two collaborators deserve special recognition and thanks. René Weber at UC Santa Barbara was the first to introduce me to neural connectivity and has provided helpful guidance for conceptualizing communication phenomena from a connectivity perspective. Michael Mangus at UC Santa Barbara deserves special praise for his technical contributions, particularly the development of automation procedures that make the manipulation of large brain-imaging data sets much more manageable. I am sincerely grateful for their help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huskey, R. (2016). Beyond Blobology: Using Psychophysiological Interaction Analyses to Investigate the Neural Basis of Human Communication Phenomena. In: Kubitschko, S., Kaun, A. (eds) Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40699-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40700-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)