Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 919))

Abstract

There are a large number of search engines designed to take mass spectrometry fragmentation spectra and match them to peptides from proteins in a database. These peptides could be unmodified, but they could also bear modifications that were added biologically or during sample preparation. As a measure of reliability for the peptide identification, software normally calculates how likely a given quality of match could have been achieved at random, most commonly through the use of target-decoy database searching (Elias and Gygi, Nat Methods 4(3): 207–214, 2007). Matching the correct peptide but with the wrong modification localization is not a random match, so results with this error will normally still be assessed as reliable identifications by the search engine. Hence, an extra step is required to determine site localization reliability, and the software approaches to measure this are the subject of this part of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elias JE, Gygi SP (2007) Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 4(3):207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chalkley RJ, Clauser KR (2012) Modification site localization scoring: strategies and performance. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(5):3–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Savitski MM, Lemeer S, Boesche M, Lang M, Mathieson T, Bantscheff M, Kuster B (2011) Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(2):M110.003830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker PR, Trinidad JC, Chalkley RJ (2011) Modification site localization scoring integrated into a search engine. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(7):M111 008078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Spectrum Mill – Agilent Technologies Inc. Available from: http://www.chem.agilent.com/en-US/Products/software/chromatography/ms/spectrummillformassh unterworkstation/pages/default.aspx

  6. Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP (2006) A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 24(10):1285–1292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scaffold – Proteome Software. Available from: http://www.proteomesoftware.com/products/ptm/

  8. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, Mann M (2006) Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127(3):635–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taus T, Kocher T, Pichler P, Paschke C, Schmidt A, Henrich C, Mechtler K (2011) Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J Proteome Res 10(12):5354–5362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Proteome Discoverer – Thermo Scientific. Available from: http://www.thermoscientific.com/en/product/proteome-discoverer-software.html

  11. Marx H, Lemeer S, Schliep JE, Matheron L, Mohammed S, Cox J, Mann M, Heck AJ, Kuster B (2013) A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 31(6):557–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapp EA, Schutz F, Reid GE, Eddes JS, Moritz RL, O’Hair RA, Speed TP, Simpson RJ (2003) Mining a tandem mass spectrometry database to determine the trends and global factors influencing peptide fragmentation. Anal Chem 75(22):6251–6264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker PR, Chalkley RJ (2014) MS-viewer: a web-based spectral viewer for proteomics results. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(5):1392–1396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore KE, Gozani O (2014) An unexpected journey: lysine methylation across the proteome. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839(12):1395–1403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chalkley RJ (2013) When target-decoy false discovery rate estimations are inaccurate and how to spot instances. J Proteome Res 12(2):1062–1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by NIH NIGMS grant 8P41GM103481.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Chalkley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chalkley, R.J. (2016). Modification Site Localization in Peptides. In: Mirzaei, H., Carrasco, M. (eds) Modern Proteomics – Sample Preparation, Analysis and Practical Applications. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 919. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41448-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics