Skip to main content

Grid-Less Imaging with Anti-scatter Correction Software in 2D Mammography: A JAFROC Study Using Simulated Lesions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1916 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a virtual clinical trial study to assess the justification of the grid-less mammography acquisition mode with scatter correction software, as developed by Siemens Healthcare (PRIME mode). Materials and methods: The study was performed on a Siemens mammography unit using the conventional acquisition mode (system 1) and a second system used PRIME. Mean glandular doses (MGD) were compared from data of 5981 images. A paired t-test for all thickness groups (<29 mm, 30–49 mm, 50–70 mm, >69 mm) separately and combined had shown a significantly higher average MGD for system 1 (NON-PRIME) when compared to system 2 (PRIME), with an overall decrease of 11.7 %. The next phase in justification focused on detectability performance, in particular for screening applications. A dataset mimicking an enriched screened population was created by simulating previously developed anthropomorphic mass models and microcalcification clusters in 60 out of 100 normal mammograms of system 1 (NON-PRIME). The same physical lesions were then simulated into 60 out of 100 PRIME, normal mammograms. Care was taken to simulate each lesion model in matched mammograms PRIME-NON PRIME in terms of BI-RADS score, in a region with the same background glandularity (obtained after analysis with Volpara) and in a breast of the same thickness group. All images were visualized with ViewDEX software and four radiologists performed the free search detectability study. A JAFROC analysis was executed and detectability was quantified by means of the AUC. Results: Present approach allowed the realization of paired virtual clinical data sets starting from 200 normal mammograms. The results of all readers separately as well as combined showed approximately the same AUC for PRIME and NON-PRIME (0.57 vs 0.60), and the ANOVA analysis showed no statistical significant difference in detectability of the lesions between PRIME and NON-PRIME (p-value 0.36). The same result was found if the dataset was subdivided for both types of lesions: masses (p-value 0.88) and microcalcification clusters (p-value 0.33). Conclusion: Results state that the MGD is significantly lower in PRIME mode than with the conventional acquisition while lesion detectability remained constant for all four radiologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shaheen, E., Van Ongeval, C., Zanca, F., Cockmartin, L., Marshall, N., Jacobs, J., Young, K.C., Dance, D.R., Bosmans, H.: The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 38(12), 6659–6671 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaheen, E., De Keyzer, F., Bosmans, H., Dance, D.R., Young, K.C., Van Ongeval, C.: The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 41(8), 081913 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salvagnini, E., Bosmans, H., Struelens, L., Marshall, N.W.: Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared. Med. Phys. 39(6), 3167–3180 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Highnam, R., Brady, S.M., Yaffe, M.J., Karssemeijer, N., Harvey, J.: Robust Breast Composition Measurement - Volpara. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 342–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Håkansson, M., Svensson, S., Zachrisson, S., Svalkvist, A., Båth, M., Månsson, L.G.: VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Rad Prot Dosimetry 139(1–3), 42–51 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chakraborty, D.P.: Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free response ROC (JAFROC). Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114(1-3), 26–31 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakraborty, D.P., Berbaum, K.S.: Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med. Phys. 31(8), 2313–2330 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Toroi, P., Zanca, F., Young, K.C., Van Ongeval, C., Marchal, G., Bosmans, H.: Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system. Eur. Radiol. 17(9), 2368–2375 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Bemelmans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bemelmans, F., Van Peteghem, N., Adversalo, X.B., Salvagnini, E., Van Ongeval, C., Bosmans, H. (2016). Grid-Less Imaging with Anti-scatter Correction Software in 2D Mammography: A JAFROC Study Using Simulated Lesions. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics