Skip to main content

Scientific Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability

Abstract

The sustainable development movement originated from the notion that globally industrial development occurring at an accelerated pace created a polluted environment, became a threat to human health and life, caused widening income gaps between the wealthy and the poor, and posed a dangerous depletion of natural resources that sustain life on earth. The Brundtland Commission provided the crucial impetus to the idea of development that is sustainable. United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals were constructed to motivate progress towards sustainability. From an engineer’s viewpoint, one could follow the history of environmental protection in the USA to realize that much work was already done in alleviating the environmental ills to reach a point that is conducive to the adoption of the ideas of sustainable development without radical changes. Industry already has been innovating under the ideas of waste minimization and pollution prevention, and engineering was central to that development.

“It is better to be kind than right.”

— Ratan Tata, industrialist and benefactor

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development adopted its 15th principle as follows: “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.” The Precautionary Principle allows measures that would seem to prevent damage to human health and the environment when the causality between a stressor and the impacts is plausible even in the absence of confirmed scientific evidence.

  2. 2.

    http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

  3. 3.

    Eight Millennium Development Goals are (1) eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, (2) achieve universal primary education, (3) promote gender equality, (4) reduce child mortality, (5) improve maternal health, (6) combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases, (7) ensure environmental sustainability, and (8) develop a global partnership for development).

  4. 4.

    Review of the Targets for the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective, http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/review-of-targets-for-the-sustainable-development-goals-the-science-perspective-2015/SDG-Report.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2015.

  5. 5.

    NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. http://enviroscienceinc.com/services/environmental-compliance-services/. Accessed 27 Sept 2015.

  6. 6.

    The uncertainty of sustainable development was expressed by Hales and Prescott-Allen in this fashion: “Making progress toward sustainability is like going to a destination we have never before visited, equipped with a sense of geography and the principles of navigation, but without a map or compass.”

    – Hales D and Prescott-Allen R (2002) Flying blind: assessing progress toward sustainability. In: Esty DC, Ivanova MH (eds) Global environmental governance: options and opportunities. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. New Haven, pp 31–52).

  7. 7.

    Report on the Environment (2014), http://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator.cfm?i

  8. 8.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_Seattle)

References

Suggestions for Further Reading

  • Anand S, Amartya Sen A (2000) Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev 28(12):2029–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson B-O, Levin S, Maler K-G, Perrings C, Pimental D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268:520–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batterham RJ (2006) Sustainability – the next chapter. Chem Eng Sci 61:4188–4193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society. Sage Publications, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas H, Fath BD (2002) Towards a theory of sustainable systems. Fluid Phase Equilibr 194(197):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro CJ (2004) Sustainable development – mainstream and critical perspectives. Organ Environ 17(2):195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesworth W (2002) Sustainability and the end of history. Am Geophys Inst Geotimes 5:51–52, www.geotimes.org

  • Colombo U (2001) The club of Rome and sustainable development. Futures 33(1):7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • De Paula O, Gabriela N (2000) Ethics: essence for sustainability. J Clean Prod 8(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Soto H (2000) The mystery of capital. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Elinor O, Paul C (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld J (2002) Industrial ecology: coming of age. EST 1:281A

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel TE, Allenby BR (1995) Industrial ecology. Princeton Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S (1997) Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harv Bus Rev 1997:66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins LH (1999) Natural capital. Little Brown and Company, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (1999) Markets and sustainability. Sci Total Environ 240(1-3):75–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houck O (2003) Tales from a troubled marriage: science and law in environmental policy. Science 302:1926–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann MH (2003) The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean Technol Environ Policy 5:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg B (ed) (2004) Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim FT (2009) The conflict over environmental regulation in the United States. Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JD, Toffel TG (2005) Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 39(3):673

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle. North Point Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael AJ, Butler CD, Folke CD (2003) New visions for addressing sustainability. Science 302:1919–1920

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mebratu D (1998) Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18:493–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty P, Honnery D (2001) Rise and fall of the carbon civilisation. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2002) The environment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod P (2005) Why most things fail. Pantheon Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla E (2002) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecol Econ 41(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut J (2000) Industrial management for sustaining the environment. Technol Soc 22(4):467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeski D (2004) Environmentalism and the technologies of tomorrow: shaping the next industrial revolution (edited with Robert Olson). Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven PH (2002) Science, sustainability, and the human prospect. Science 297:954–958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidz D, Willott W (2002) Natural enemies: an anatomy of environmental conflict. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer S, Avery DT (2007) Unstoppable global warming every 1500 years. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lantham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2002) The Earth’s biosphere. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolow R, Andrews C, Berkhout F, Thomas V (1994) Industrial ecology and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson RT (2003) Climate change, the political situation. Science 302:1925–1926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winterton N (2003) Science and sustainability: who knows best. Clean Technol Environ Policy 5:154–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Geldrop J, Withagen C (2000) Natural capital and sustainability. Ecol Econ 32(3):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vig NJ, Kraft ME (1994) Environmental policy in the 1990s. CQ Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sikdar, S.K., Sengupta, D., Mukherjee, R. (2017). Scientific Sustainability. In: Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42719-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics