Skip to main content

A Practical Guide to the Use of Major Elements, Trace Elements, and Isotopes in Compositional Data Analysis: Applications for Deep Formation Brine Geochemistry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Compositional Data Analysis (CoDaWork 2015)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 187))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the geosciences, isotopic ratios and trace element concentrations are often used along with major element concentrations to help determine sources of and processes affecting geochemical variation. Compositional Data Analysis (CoDA) is a set of tools, generally attuned to major element data, concerned with the proper statistical treatment and removal of spurious correlations from compositional data. Though recent insights have been made on the incorporation of trace elements and stable isotope ratios to CoDA, this study provides a general approach to thinking about how radiogenic isotopes, stable isotopes, and trace elements fit with major elements in the CoDA framework. In the present study, we use multiple data sets of deep formation brines and compare traditional mixing models to their CoDA counterparts to examine fluid movement between reservoirs. Concentrations of individual isotopes are calculated using isotopic ratios and global mean isotopic abundances. One key result is that isotope parts (e.g. \(^{18}\)O, \(^{17}\)O, \(^{16}\)O, \(^{2}\)H, \(^{1}\)H, \(^{87}\)Sr, \(^{86}\)Sr) can simply be modelled by the major element concentration (H\(_{2}\)O, Sr) in a clr-biplot as they are perfectly dependent. Another important result is that an ilr transformation of radiogenic isotope parts (e.g. \(^{86}\)Sr and \(^{87}\)Sr in \(^{87}\)Sr/\(^{86}\)Sr) and trace elements can, like stable isotopes in delta notation, be treated as a linear function of the isotopic ratio or trace element concentration, scaled only by a constant. This implies that there are multiple situations in which an ilr transformation provides little additional insight for the analysis of trends: (1) any two parts with low log ratio variance (e.g. an isotope ratio), no matter their concentrations in the solution, (2) any low concentration parts (trace elements) or a ratio of a trace to a major element, no matter the variance of the elements, and (3) large positive ratios (major/trace) over a restricted range of variance. Similarly, a multivariate ilr transformation of a large data set with many parts will also be a simple perturbation if the balances are evenly split between parts. CoDA transformations, however, even if they do not provide new insight in some specific cases, will provide consistent interpretations for all types of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (Reprinted in 2003 by The Blackburn Press), p. 416. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London (UK) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aitchison, J., Greenacre, M.: Biplots of compositional data. Appl. Stat. 51, 375–392 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Buccianti, A., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.: New perspectives on water chemistry and compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 37, 703–727 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chayes, F.: On correlation between variables of constant sum. J. Geophys. Res. 65(12), 4185–4193 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig, H.: Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133, 1702–1703 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engle, M.A., Blondes, M.S.: Linking compositional data analysis with thermodynamic geochemical modeling: oilfield brines from the Permian Basin, USA. J. Geochem. Explor. 141, 61–70 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engle, M.A., Reyes, F.R., Varonka, M.S., Orem, W.H., Ma, L., Ianno, A.J., Schell, T.M., Xu, P., Carroll, K.C.: Geochemistry of formation waters from the Wolfcamp and “Cline” shales: insights into brine origin, reservoir connectivity, and fluid flow in the Permian Basin, USA. Chem. Geol. 425, 76–92 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engle, M.A., Rowan, E.L.: Interpretation of Na–Cl–Br systematics in sedimentary basin brines: comparison of concentration, element ratio, and isometric log-ratio approaches. Math. Geosci. 45(1), 87–101 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egozcue, J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., Barceló-Vidal, C.: Isometric log ratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 35, 279–300 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Faure, G., Mensing, T.M.: Isotopes: Principles and Applications, 3rd edn, p. 928. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., Reimann, C.: The bivariate statistical analysis of environmental (compositional) data. Sci. Tot. Environ. 408(19), 4230–4238 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geboy, N.J., Engle, M.A., Hower, J.C.: Whole-coal versus ash basis in coal geochemistry: a mathematical approach to consistent interpretations. Int. J. Coal Geol. 113, 41–49 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldschmidt, V.M.: Geochemistry, Muir, A. (ed.) Clarendon Press, Oxford (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grunsky, E.C., Kjarsgaard, B.A., Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Thió i Fernández de Henestrosa, S.: Studies in stoichiometry with compositional data. In: 3rd compositional data analysis workshop CoDaWork ’08, p. 7 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grunsky, E.C., Mueller, U.A., Corrigan, D.: A study of the lake sediment geochemistry of the Melville Peninsula using multivariate methods: applications for predictive geological mapping. J. Geochem. Explor. 141, 15–41 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Irving, A.J.: A review of experimental studies of crystal/liquid trace element partitioning. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42(6), 743–770 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen, G.K.S., Rostron, B.J., Duke, M.J.M., Holmden, C.: Chemical profiles of formation waters from potash mine shafts, Saskatchewan. In: Summary of Investigations 2006, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2006-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-7, p. 8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kloppman, W., Négrel, P., Casanova, J., Klinge, H., Schelkes, K., Guerrot, C.: Halite dissolution derived brines in the vicinity of a Permian salt dome (N German Basin). Evidence from boron, strontium, oxygen, and hydrogen isotopes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65, 4087–4101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearson, K.: Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. On a form of spurious correlations which may arise when indices are used in the measurements of organs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 60, 489–498 (1897)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Puig, R., Tolosana-Delgado, R., Otero, N., Folch, A.: Combining isotopic and compositional data: a discrimination of regions prone to nitrate pollution. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Buccianti A. (eds.) Compositional Data Analysis: Theory and Applications, pp. 302–317. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rozanski, K., Araguás-Araguás, L., Gonfiantini, R.: Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation. In: Swart, P.K., Lohmann, K.C., McKenzie, J., Savin, S. (eds.) Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records, pp. 1–36. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sofer, Z., Gat, J.R.: Activities and concentrations of oxygen-18 in concentrated aqueous salt solutions: analytical and geophysical implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 15, 232–238 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sofer, Z., Gat, J.R.: The isotope composition of evaporating brines: effect of the isotopic activity ratio in saline solutions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 26, 179–186 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tolosana-Delgado, R., Otero, N., Soler, A.: A compositional approach to stable isotope data analysis. In: 2nd Compositional Data Analysis Workshop CoDaWork ’05, p. 11 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tolosana-Delgado, R., van den Boogaart, K.G.: Towards compositional geochemical potential mapping. J. Geochem. Explor. 141, 42–51 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Energy Resources Program. The authors appreciate constructive reviews by Ricardo Olea and two anonymous reviewers, as well as useful feedback from the CoDaWork 2015 workshop participants and Allan Kolker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Blondes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (Outside the USA)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blondes, M.S., Engle, M.A., Geboy, N.J. (2016). A Practical Guide to the Use of Major Elements, Trace Elements, and Isotopes in Compositional Data Analysis: Applications for Deep Formation Brine Geochemistry. In: Martín-Fernández, J., Thió-Henestrosa, S. (eds) Compositional Data Analysis. CoDaWork 2015. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44811-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics