Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Web 2.0 Applications for Knowledge Management in Small and Micro Firms: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Knowledge Management in Action

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 3))

  • 1349 Accesses

Abstract

According to many scholars, the characteristics of the new web 2.0 technologies (like e.g. flexibility of contents and knowledge domains, cost efficiency, openness and easy interaction with other systems) make them particularly suitable as a knowledge management (KM) tool for small enterprises. Nevertheless, the empirical evidence (although still little, at present) shows that there are some open questions about how small businesses should implement these new technologies. This chapter compares and contrasts two possible approaches to the introduction of web 2.0 applications as a KM tool: a “top-down” approach, where the application is implemented based on the strict adherence with the top-management views, and a “bottom-up” approach, where the system gradually develops thanks to the initiatives coming from the user level. It also provides real-life case study evidence of the introduction and use of a web 2.0 KM system in the context of a small company. The case-study helps to understand that, due to the nature itself of web 2.0 systems and of the kind of knowledge that these systems may help to share, a successful implementation needs to fit the real needs of end-users. Therefore, a bottom-up approach (where the actual requirements of the system and of the underlying KM processes are derived from the user needs) can be more appropriate than a top-down approach (where users, processes and technologies are designed and planned in advance based on a model of what the company should be). This can be especially true in the case of small companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almeida, F. L. F., & Rocha, R. M. (2011). Introduction of a wiki in an enterprise: Motives and challenges. Journal of Systems Integration, 2(4), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriole, S. J. (2010). Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Communications of the ACM, 53(12), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, G. J., & Connolly, T. M. (2014). Implementing Web 2.0 tools in organisations: Feasibility of a systematic approach. The Learning Organization, 21(1), 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., Paiola, M., & Scarso, E. (2011). KM issues in KIBS companies. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge Management, (pp. 107–114). Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt, U. (2013). Towards value-oriented use of social media for knowledge management in SME. In A. Fred, J. L. G. Dietz, K. Liu, & J. Filipe (Eds.), Knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management (pp. 323–336). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, N. (2008). Enterprise 2.0: How social software will change the future of work. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotsika, F., & Patrick, K. (2013). Collaborative KM for SMEs: A framework evaluation study. Information Technology & People, 26(4), 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). The new SME definition. Brussel: User guide and model declaration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. (2013). Making sense of enterprise 2.0. Vine, 43(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Reinhart, J. (2005). Wiki and the Wiki way: Beyond a knowledge management solution. Information Systems Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, T. P. L. (2009). Wikis as a knowledge management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, M. E., Böhmann, T., & Krcmar, H. (2007). A strategy for knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(6), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, H., & Pfaff, C. C. (2006). The Wiki: An environment to revolutionise employees’ interaction with corporate knowledge. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments (pp. 377–381). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, A. J. (2010). Increasing collaborative knowledge management in your organization: Characteristics of Wiki Technology and Wiki users. In SIGMIS-CPR ’10 (pp. 158–164). Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalonen, H. (2014). A framework for dealing with fundamental knowledge problems through social media. Vine, 44(4), 558–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiniti, S., & Standing, C. (2013). Wikis as knowledge management systems: Issues and challenges. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 15(2), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leedy, P. D., & Omrod, J. P. (2005). Practical research—planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. (2009). WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykourentzou, I., Dagka, F., Papadaki, K., Lepouras, G., & Vassilakis, G. (2012). Wikis in enterprise settings: A survey. Enterprise Information Systems, 6(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Wagner, C., & Yates, D. (2013). The impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloche, J. A., Hasan, H. M., Wills, D., Pfaff, C., & Qi, Y. (2009). Co-creating corporate knowledge with a Wiki. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meske, C., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Adoption and use of social media in small and medium-sized enterprises. In F. Harmsen & H. Proper (Eds.), Practice-driven research on enterprise transformation (pp. 61–75). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Migdadi, M. (2009). Knowledge management enablers and outcomes in the small-and-medium sized enterprises. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(6), 840–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milovanović, M., Minović, M., Štavljani, V., Savkovi, M., & Starčević, D. (2012). Wiki as a corporate learning tool: Case study for software development company. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(8), 767–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mühleisen, B., Schneider, C., Witschel, H. F., & Gutknecht, C. (2013). Success factors of enterprise 2.0. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Graz, September 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujadi, H., Takeda, H., Shakya, A., Kawamoto, S., Kobayashi, S., Fujiyama, A., et al. (2006). Semantic Wiki as a lightweight knowledge management system. In Proceedings of Semantic Web—Aswc (pp. 65–71).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, P., Gagliardi, D., Caliandro, C., Bohn, N. U., & Klitou, D. (2014). Annual report on European SMEs 2013/2014—a partial and fragile recovery. European Commission, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Marqués, D., Soto-Acosta, P., & Merigó, J. M. (2015). Analyzing the effects of technological, organizational and competition factors on Web knowledge exchange in SMEs. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, C. C., & Hasan, H. H. (2011). Wiki-based knowledge management systems for more democratic organizations. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(2), 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razmerita, L., & Kirchner, K. (2011). How Wikis can be used to manage knowledge in SMEs: A case study. Business Information Review, 28(3), 175–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarso, E., & Bolisani, E. (2012). Trust in knowledge exchanges between service providers and clients: A multiple case study of KIBS. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta, P., Perez-Gonzalez, P., & Popa, S. (2014). Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs. Service Business, 8(3), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, F., Aparicio, M., & Costa, C. J. (2010). Organizational Wiki as a knowledge management tool. In Proceedings of SIGDOC, San Carlos, Brazil, September 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, C., & Kiniti, S. (2011). How can organizations use Wiki for innovations? Technovation, 31(7), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2011). Adoption and use of corporate Wikis in German small and medium-sized enterprises. In AMCIS 2011 Proceedings, Detroit, August 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. (2004). Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Chong, C., Choy Chong, S., & Chew Gan, G. (2011). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs among small and medium enterprises. Library Review, 60(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2005). An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiller, M., & Schauer, B. (2011). Adoption, motivation and success factors of social media for team collaboration in SMEs. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies ACM, Graz, Austria. September 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DTG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Ettore Bolisani & Enrico Scarso

Authors
  1. Ettore Bolisani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrico Scarso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Scarso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, Science and Technology, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Remko Helms

  2. School of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington, Lambton Quay, Pipitea Campus, New Zealand

    Jocelyn Cranefield

  3. The Courseware Company, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Jurriaan van Reijsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolisani, E., Scarso, E. (2017). Web 2.0 Applications for Knowledge Management in Small and Micro Firms: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Approach. In: Helms, R., Cranefield, J., van Reijsen, J. (eds) Social Knowledge Management in Action. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45133-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation