Skip to main content

Academic Job Satisfaction and Motivation: Perspectives from a Nation-Wide Study in Public Higher Education Institutions in Portugal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Options: The Academic Profession in Europe

Abstract

The centrality of the faculty role makes it a primary sculptor of higher education institutions (HEIs). The performance of academic staff such as teachers and researchers has an impact on student learning and implications for the quality HEIs and therefore their contribution to society. Thus the academic staff can, with appropriate support, build a national and international reputation for themselves and for the institution in the professional areas, in research and in publishing.

The Portuguese higher education system has been faced with major reforms over the last years, which include the implementation of the Bologna Process, the approval of a new legal regime for the HEIs and the approval of new statutes relating to the academic career in the public HEIs.

Job satisfaction and motivation are viewed as a predictor of positive attitudes at work, productivity, and, consequently, good results for the institutions. The purpose of this chapter is to present and analyse the findings of a nationwide study on satisfaction and motivation of academics in Portuguese public higher education institutions. The data are extensively analysed and findings are presented here, along with the implications they offer to Portuguese public HEIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Bacharel” was a degree achieved after 3 years at HEI before the changes introduced by the Bologna process; “Licenciado” is the Portuguese term for Bachelor; “Mestre” is the Portuguese term for Master; “Doutor” is the Portuguese term for PhD.

  2. 2.

    Agência de Avaliação e Acreditação do Ensino Superior.

  3. 3.

    They were predicted, but never applied.

  4. 4.

    The concept of amotivation is used by Vallerand et al. (1992).

  5. 5.

    According to Malhotra and Birks (2007), although no conclusions can be inferred for the population when working with non-probability samples, as it is the case, it is always possible to draw some conclusions about the behaviour of the population and, therefore, to assume some conclusions regarding the research questions. Please, see Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2007). Marketing research: An applied approach. 3rd Edition. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.

  6. 6.

    See Saris, W., available at http://surveymethodology.eu/conferences/warsaw-2009/sessions/106/).

  7. 7.

    As suggested by Vaus, D. (2004). Analyzing social science data. London: Sage, reprinted, p. 112.

  8. 8.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,84; Explained Variance: 44,4 %

  9. 9.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,95; Explained Variance: 80,8 %

  10. 10.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,92; Explained Variance: 71,9 %

  11. 11.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,90; Explained Variance: 48,3 %

  12. 12.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,86; Explained Variance: 72,7 %

  13. 13.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,79; Explained Variance: 70,5 %

  14. 14.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,91; Explained Variance: 84,6 %

  15. 15.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,83; Explained Variance: 74,6 %

  16. 16.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,93; Explained Variance: 82,1 %

  17. 17.

    Cronbach’ Alpha:0,89; Explained Variance: 68,8 %

  18. 18.

    Cronbach’ Alpha: 0,83; Explained Variance: 54,8 %

References

  • Addio, A. C., Eriksson, T., & Frijters, P. (2007). An analysis of the determinants of job satisfaction when individuals’ baseline satisfaction levels may differ. Applied Economics, 39(1), 2413–2423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (Ed.). (2000). The changing academic workplace: Comparative perspectives. Boston College: Center for International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., & Chait, R. (2001). Introduction. Higher Education, 41, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (Org.) (2003). The decline of the guru: The academic profession in developing and middle-income countries. New York: Palgrave/MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, M. P., & Possamai, F. (2010). Da simplicidade para a complexidade: O trabalho enredado do professor universitário. In M. P. Alves & M. A. Flores (Orgs.) (Eds.), Trabalho docente, formação e avaliação: Clarificar conceitos, fundamentar práticas (pp. 35–51). Mangualde: Edições Pedago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Ferreira, J. F., Machado, M. L., & Santiago, R. (2006). Modelos de governação e gestão dos Institutos Politécnicos no contexto europeu. Castelo Branco: Politécnica – Associação dos Institutos Politécnicos do Centro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, S., Huston, T., & Norman, M. (2005). A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 803–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrier, J., & Musselin, C. (2009). The rationalization of academic work and careers: Ongoing transformations of the profession and policy challenges. In B. M. Kehm, J. Huisman, & B. Stensaker (Eds.), The European higher education area: Perspectives on a moving target (pp. 203–221). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, P., Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuere, L., & Meek, L. (Eds.). (2013). Job satisfaction around the academic world (The changing academy – The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective, Vol. 7). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (2007). The academic profession and increasing expectations of relevance. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (pp. 19–28). Kassel: INCHER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brites Ferreira, J., Seco, G., Canastra, F., Dias, I. S., & Abreu, M. O. (2011). (In)sucesso académico no ensino superior: Conceitos, factores e estratégias de intervenção. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior (RIES), México, IISUE-UNAM/Universia, II(4). Available at http://ries.universia.net/index.php/ries/article/view/91

  • Brites Ferreira, J., Machado, M. L., & Gouveia, O. (2012). Satisfação e motivação dos docentes do ensino superior em Portugal. Revista Ibero-americana de Educação, secção ‘Estudos e Investigações’/Docência Universitária, 58/1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C., & Torres, C. A. (2004). Globalização e educação: Uma introdução. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Orgs.), Globalização e educação: Perspectivas críticas (pp. 11–26). São Paulo: Artmed Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrito, B. (2006). Higher education in Portugal: Recent evolution, democratisation and trends. The Journal of Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities, 3, 242–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capelleras, J. (2005). Attitudes of academic staff towards their job and organization: An empirical assessment. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraça, J. G., Conceição, P., & Heitor, M. V. (1996). Uma perspectiva sobre a missão das universidades. Análise Social, 139, 1201–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli, A., & Teichler, U. (2010). The academic profession: A common core, a diversified group or an outdated idea? European Review, 18(1), S1–S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimanikire, P., Mutandwa, E., Gadzirayi, C. T., Muzondo, N., & Mutandwa, B. (2007). Factors affecting job satisfaction among academic professionals in tertiary institutions in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Business Management, 1(6), 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4(4), 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2006). Conceptions of contemporary European universities: To do research or not do research? European Journal of Education, 41(2), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, D., Machado-Taylor, M. L., Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., & Sousa, S. (2013). Portugal: Dimensions of academic job satisfaction. In P. Bentley, H. Coates, I. Dobson, L. Goedegebuere, & L. Meek (Eds.), Job satisfaction around the academic world (The changing academy – The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective, Vol. 7, pp. 187–208). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1998). A three domain model of teacher and school executive career satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K. O., & Kaplan, D. M. (2005). The career life of academics: Boundaried or boundaryless? Human Relations, 58(6), 699–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, R. (2005). The HR challenge: Some more thoughts. Response to Keynote Address. Seminar on HR issues OECD, Paris, August 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbule, P. E. (2003). Factors related to job satisfaction of academic staff in Nigerian universities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(2), 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (1999). Crisis? What crisis? The academic professions in the “knowledge” society. Higher Education, 38(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2000). Academic staff in Europe: Changing employment and working conditions. In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic work and life: What it is to be an academic, and how this is changing (pp. 7–32). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1999). Managing to motivate: A guide for school leaders. London and New York: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J. B., Machado-Taylor, M. L., Brites, R., & Gouveia, O. M. R. (2012a). O trabalho académico no ensino superior, em Portugal. In C. Leite & M. Zabalza (Coords.), Ensino superior: Inovação e qualidade na docência (pp. 9168–9182). Porto: Edição CIIE – Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas/Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J. B., Seco, G. Abreu, M. O., Dias, I. S., Cadima, R., & Canastra, F. (2012b). Sucesso e satisfação dos estudantes finalistas do Instituto Politécnico de Leiria. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria/Edições Afrontamento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontes, J. F. (2002). La satisfacción en el trabajo de académicos en una universidad publica estatal. Perfiles Educativos, 24(96), 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, J. (2002). I prefer to teach: An international comparison of faculty preference for teaching over research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaz-Pontes, J. F., Padilla- González, L., & Gil-Antón, M. (2007). The increasing expectation of relevance for higher education and the academic profession: Some reflections on the case of Mexico. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (pp. 57–81). Kassel: INCHER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J. M. (2010). Rethinking faculty work and workplaces. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G., & Whitchurch, C. (Eds.). (2010). Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • GPEARI. (2011). Docentes do ensino superior [2001 a 2009]. Lisboa: Gabinete de Planeamento, Estratégia, Avaliação e Relações Internacionais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, XXVII(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1998). Os professores em tempos de mudança: O trabalho dos professores na idade pós-moderna. Lisboa: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). O ensino na sociedade do conhecimento: A educação na era da insegurança. Porto: Porto Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2007). Shifting boundaries and the academic profession. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (pp. 191–204). Kassel: INCHER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2010). Introduction: Change and continuity in academic and professional identities. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 3–12). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. C. (2003). Scientists and satisfaction. Social Studies of Science, 33(1), 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, E. A., & Teichler, U. (2011). What makes academics happy? Factors for academic job satisfaction – An international comparison. EAIR 33rd Annual Forum, Warsaw, 28–31 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D., Meyer, L. H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession and its interface with management: Some introductory thoughts. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (pp. 9–18). Kassel: INCHER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, L. (2012). Patterns of institutional management: Democratisation, autonomy and managerialist canon. In G. Neave & A. Amaral (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009 (pp. 287–306). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, M. L., Meira Soares, V., Brites, R., Brites Ferreira, J., Farhangmehr, M., & Gouveia, O. (2011). Uma análise da satisfação e da motivação dos docentes no ensino superior português. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 17, 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, M. L., Meira Soares, V., Brites Ferreira, J., Brites, R., Farhangmehr, M., & Gouveia, O. M. R. (2013). Job (in)satisfaction among academics in Portuguese higher education institutions. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 2, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado-Taylor, M. L., Meira Soares, V., & Gouveia, O. (2010). The study of academic job satisfaction and motivation: An ongoing study in Portuguese higher education. Global Business & Economics Anthology, B&ESI, II(2), 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A. M., & Santiago, R. (2012). Governance, public management and administration. In G. Neave & A. Amaral (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009 (pp. 227–248). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2007). Marketing research: An applied approach (3rd ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2009). The academic professions in the global era. In J. Enders & E. Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marqueze, E. C., & Moreno, C. R. (2005). Satisfação no trabalho: Uma breve revisão. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 30(112), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (2000a). Changing academic work roles: The everyday realities challenging quality in teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (2000b). Towards new balance or new divides? The changing work roles of academics in Australia. In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic work and life: What it is to be an academic, and how this is changing (pp. 117–145). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meira Soares, V. (2001). The academic profession in a massifying system: The Portuguese case. In J. Enders (Ed.), The academic staff in Europe: Changing contexts and conditions (pp. 233–253). Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meira Soares, V. (2003). The attractiveness of the academic careers in Portugal. Matosinhos: Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meira Soares, V., & Trindade, A. R. (2004). The attractiveness of the academic career. In J. Enders & E. de Weert (Eds.), The international attractiveness of the academic workplace in Europe. Franfurt am Main: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J. C., & Ferreira, J. B. (2006). Globalização e autonomia: Desafios, compromissos e incongruências. In A. F. Moreira & J. A. Pacheco (Eds.), Globalização e educação (pp. 61–86). Porto: Porto Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. (1997). Commitment in organizations. Psychologies, 41(4), 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2007). Transformations of academic work: Facts and analysis. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (pp. 175–190). Kassel: INCHER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2010). The impact of changing recruitment practices on academic profiles. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2009). The academic estate revisited: Reflections on academia’s rapid progress from the Capitoline hill to the tarpeian rock. In J. Enders & J. Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives (pp. 15–35). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. G., Hitchcock, M. A., & Teherani, A. (2000). Faculty satisfaction in academic medicine. New Directions for Institutional Research, 27(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshagbemi, T. (1997). Job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in higher education. Education + Training, 39(9), 354–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshagbemi, T. (1999). Academics and their managers: A comparative study in job satisfaction. Personnel Review, 28(1/2), 108–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshagbemi, T. (2000). How satisfied are academics with their primary tasks of teaching, research and administration and management? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(2), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PORDATA. (2011). Docentes. Lisbon: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Retrieved June 2, 2011, from: http://www.pordata.pt/azap_runtime/?n=26&SubThemeId=43&Varnum=7

  • Rego, A. (2001). Percepções de justiça: Estudos de dimensionalização com professores do ensino superior. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 17(2), 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J. (2005). Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhapparaj, A. S., & Alam, S. S. (2005). Job satisfaction among academic staff in private universities in Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Sousa, S. B., Carvalho, T., Machado-Taylor, L., & Amado, D. (2013). Teaching and research; perspectives from Portugal. In J. Cheol Shin, U. Teichler, W. K. Cummings, & A. Arimoto (Eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education: Systems, activities, nexus, and rewards (pp. 153–176). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, G. M. G. (2007). O desenvolvimento de carreira dos académicos: Uma análise centrada na relação entre o trabalho e a família. Ph.D. Thesis. Braga: Universidade do Minho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seco, G., Pereira, I., Dias, I. S., Casimiro, M., & Custódio, S. (2006). Para uma abordagem psicológica da transição do ensino secundário para o ensino superior: pontos e alçapões. Politécnica – Associação dos Institutos Politécnicos do Centro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R. B. (1998). Para uma análise da satisfação com o trabalho. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 26, 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sledge, S., Miles, A., & Coppage, S. (2008). What role does culture play? A look at motivation and job satisfaction among hotel workers in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1667–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ssesanga, K., & Garrett, R. M. (2005). Job satisfaction of University academics: Perspectives from Uganda. Higher Education, 50(1), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. A. (2005). The job satisfaction of English academics and their intentions to quit academe. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardif, M., & Lassardi, C. (Orgs.) (2008). O ofício de professor: História, perspectivas e desafios internacionais. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (2008). Being an academic today. In R. Barnett & R. Di Napoli (Eds.), Changing identities in higher education: Voicing perspectives (pp. 27–39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2009). Higher education and the world of work: Conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2010). The diversifying academic profession? European Review, 18(1), S157–S179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2012). Teaching versus research: The vulnerable balance. Contribution to the Seminar Challenges and Options: The Academic Profession in Europe. Porto: Centro de Investigação de Políticas do Ensino Superior, 15–16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P. (2012). The changing public-private mix in higher education: Analysing Portugal’s apparent exceptionalism. In A. Amaral & G. Neave (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974-2009 – A nation, a generation (pp. 307–328). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaegen, P. (2005). Academic talent: Quo Vadis? Recruitment and retention of faculty in European business schools. Journal of Management Development, 24(9), 807–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. E., & Sloane, P. J. (2000). Non-pecuniary advantages versus pecuniary disadvantages: Job satisfaction among male and female academics in Scottish universities. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47(3), 273–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D., Dawis, R., England, G., & Lofquist, L. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. (Ed.). (2005). The professoriate: Profile of a profession. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R., & Sarros, J. (2002). The academic work environment in Australian universities: A motivating place to work. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylikoji, O.-H. (2005). Academic nostalgia: A narrative approach to academic work. Human Relation, 58, 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Center for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES) for funding the research project “An Examination of Academic Job Satisfaction and Motivation in Portuguese Higher Education”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria de Lourdes Machado-Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 1

Table 5.8 Satisfaction with teaching climate
Table 5.9 Satisfaction with management of the institution/department/unit
Table 5.11 Satisfaction with non academic staff (administrative staff. technical and laboratorial staff…)
Table 5.12 Satisfaction with physical work environment
Table 5.13 Satisfaction with conditions of employment
Table 5.14 Satisfaction with personal and professional development
Table 5.15 Satisfaction with institutions’ culture and values
Table 5.16 Satisfaction with institutions’ prestige
Table 5.17 Satisfaction with research climate
Table 5.18 Overall Satisfaction
Table 5.19 Overall motivation

1.2 Appendix 2

Survey on Faculty Job Satisfaction in Higher Education – CIPES – Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies

This survey was designed to collect information on your satisfaction and motivation as a faculty member. Your personal identity is not known to participate in it. This questionnaire is applied under the Project PTDC/ESC/67784/2006 – An Examination of Academic Job Satisfaction and Motivation in Portuguese Higher Education (ESMAESP), funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). If you work in more than one higher education institution, please answer reporting your major contract.

1.2.1 A Note on Privacy

This survey is anonymous. The record kept of your survey responses does not contain any identifying information about you, unless a specific question in the survey has asked for this. If you answered a survey that used an identifying token to allow you access, you can be assured that the identifying token is not kept with the answers. It is managed in a separate database and will only be updated to indicate if you completed or not this survey. It is not possible to relate the tokens of identification with the answers to this survey.

1.3 I. Satisfaction Dimensions

  1. 1.

    What is your degree of satisfaction with the following aspects of your job as a faculty member?

    1.1. Teaching climate

    Strongly dissatisfied

             

    Strongly satisfied

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    With the distribution of teaching service for teachers of your department/organizational unit

               

    With the recognition from your peers

               

    With teaching facilities (e.g. classrooms, laboratories, etc.)

               

    With the behaviour of your students in class time

               

    With training of students

               

    With the results of your work as a faculty member

               

    With your degree of autonomy in your teaching practice

               

    With class sizes

               

    With the organization of schedules

               

    1.2. Management of the Institution/Department/Unit

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With those in top management positions in your institution

               

    With those in top management positions in your department/organizational unit

               

    With communication with managers

               

    With the management's response to faculty needs

               

    With the ability of those in positions of management to innovate

               

    With the time that those in management positions take to respond to the needs of faculty

               

    1.3. Colleagues

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With the skills of faculty of your department/organizational unit

               

    With the scientific quality of the faculty of your department/organizational unit in comparison with faculty of other similar institutions

               

    With the pedagogic quality of the faculty of your department/organizational unit in comparison with faculty of other similar institutions

               

    With the interaction between faculty members of different courses

               

    With the cooperation with colleagues from different departments/units

               

    With the openness to change shown by faculty of your department/organizational unit

               

    1.4. Non academic staff (administrative staff, technical and laboratorial staff…)

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    Not applicable

    0

             

    10

    11

    With the cooperation of administrative staff in your institution

                

    With the cooperation of technical-lab staff in your institution

                

    With the performance of non academic staff in your institution

                

    With the adequacy of the number of non academic staff to the amount of existing work

                

    1.5. Physical work environment

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    Not applicable

    0

             

    10

    11

    With the quality of the office

                

    With the adequacy of laboratory equipment to your needs

                

    With the adequacy of computer facilities to your needs

                

    With the adequacy of reviews and books in your institution to carry out your work

                

    With food service (restaurant/bar/canteen)

                

    With the cleanup of the institution

                

    With the equipment available to faculty and their families (eg, gym, nursery, living spaces…)

                

    With the existence of an area to monitor the students (eg, ask questions)

                

    With the fact that you have to share the office

                

    With the existence of space/s to hold meetings

                

    With the size of classrooms

                

    With the availability of parking for faculty

                

    1.6. Conditions of employment

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With your remuneration

               

    With the career opportunities

               

    With job security

               

    1.7. Personnel and professional development

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With the conditions you have to balance work and family life

               

    With the conditions you have for your personnel development

               

    With the conditions you have for your professional development

               

    1.8. Institutions’ culture and values

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With the academic freedom you have

               

    With the participation of faculty of your institution in decision-making processes

               

    With the ability to innovate in your institution

               

    1.9. Institutions’ prestige

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With the prestige of your institution

               

    With the international partners of your institution

               

    With the national partners of your institution

               

    With the efforts of your institution to improve its image

               

    1.10. Research climate

               

    (ANSWER ONLY IF YOU DO RESEARCH)

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With the time you have to do research

               

    With the recognition by the institution of your research work

               

    With the financial resources to do research

               

    With the logistical conditions to do research

               

    With your research outputs

               

    With the degree of internationalization of your research work

               

    With the opportunities you have to do research

               

    With your number of publications/presentations

               

    1.11. General satisfaction

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

             

    10

    With your job

               

    With your institution

               

    With the opportunity you have to update knowledge

               

    With the adequacy of your skills to your teaching practice

               

    With the social prestige of your job

               

    All things considered , how do you rate your overall satisfaction:

     

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

    10

    With your teaching activity

               

    With the research you do

               
  2. 2.

    Would you advise other people to work in your current and primary institution?

    Yes

    O

    No

    O

    I don’t know

    O

  3. 3.

    In your opinion, how important is each of these aspects for students’ academic success?

     

    Not important at all

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Very important

    I have no opinion

    0

    10

    11

    Your knowledge as a faculty member

                

    Your skills as a faculty member

                

    Your motivation as a faculty member

                

    Your satisfaction as a faculty member

                
  4. 4.

    Given the mission and objectives of your institution, what is the importance you give to each of the following aspects?

     

    Not important at all

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Very important

    I have no opinion

    0

    10

    11

    Your teaching activity

                

    The research you do

                

    The support you provide to the community

                

    Your participation in governing bodies

                

1.4 II. Motivation

  1. 5.

    What is your level of motivation for each of the following aspects?

 

Strongly demotivated

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Strongly motivated

0

10

To teach

           

To do research

           

To serve the community

           

To participate in the governing bodies

           

To work in your institution

           

To remain as a faculty member in higher education

           

1.5 III. Satisfaction, Motivation and Performance

  1. 6.

    What is the importance you give to each of the following aspects for faculty performance?

 

Not important at all

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Very important

I have no opinion

0

10

11

The faculty motivation

            

The faculty satisfaction

            

1.6 IV. Academic Decision at Your Institution

  1. 7.

    Distribute 100 points among the options available to characterize the decision-making process in your (main) institution of higher education.

    • In these fields only should be introduced numbers

    • The total must be 100 points

collegial: There are widespread opportunities to participate meaningfully in decision making.

formal/rational: Decision making is formally structured. Problems are analysed. Decisions are made in a logical and reasoned manner.

autonomous: Academic and professional units function with a good deal of freedom in a decentralized or loosely coordinated environment.

autocratic: Decisions are made by higher level administrators with little or no consultation with faculty or lower level academic units.

political: Different people or groups move in and out of the decision making process, wielding varying amounts of power at different times.

Remaining:

Total:

  1. 8.

    What influence do you have, personally, in the formulation of key academic policies at the level of your unit?

Much influence

O

Some influence

O

Little influence

O

No influence

O

  1. 9.

    What influence do you have, personally, in the formulation of key academic policies at the level of your institution?

Much influence

O

Some influence

O

Little influence

O

No influence

O

1.7 V. The New Regulation for Faculty Careers (Answer Only If You Are Professor of Public Higher Education)

  1. 10.

    Do you know the new regulation for faculty careers (Decree-Law No. 205 - university higher education; Decree-Law No. 206 – polytechnic higher education; Decree-Law No 207 - polytechnic higher education, of 31, August, 2009)?

    Yes

    O (go to question 10.1.)

    No

    O (go to question 11)

  2. 10.1

    What is your degree of satisfaction with the following aspects of this new regulation?

     

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

    10

    Evaluation and Performance

               

    Hiring Process

               

    Advancement in the Academic Career

               

    The new regulation for faculty careers in general

               
  3. 10.2

    In your opinion, to what extent the new regulation for faculty careers (Decrees-Law No. 205, 206 and 207 of 31, August, 2009) contributes to facilitate the mobility of faculty between higher education institutions?

    Doesn’t contribute

    O

    Contributes little

    O

    Contributes

    O

    Contributes a lot

    O

    I have no opinion

    O

    Does the new regulation for faculty careers promote inbreeding?

    Yes

    O

    No

    O

    I don’t know

    O

    What is your degree of satisfaction with the practice ofinbreeding”?

     

    Strongly dissatisfied

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Strongly satisfied

    0

    10

    Degree of satisfaction

               

1.8 VI. Academic/Professional Context

If you work in more than one higher education institution, please answer reporting your major contract.

1.8.1 Teaching

  1. 12. 

    Academic position

Full Professor

O

Associate Professor

O

Assistant Professor

O

Invited Assistant Professor

O

Invited Associate Professor

O

Invited Full Professor

O

Visiting Assistant Professor

O

Visiting Associate Professor

O

Visiting Full Professor

O

Assistant

O

Junior Assistant

O

Invited Assistant

O

Reader

O

Monitor

O

Coordinator Professor

O

Adjunct Professor

O

Professor Equiparado-Coordinator, Adjunct, Assistant

O

Other (please specify) ______________________________

O

  1. 13. 

    Type of contract

Indefinite contract with experimental period

O

Indefinite contract without experimental period

O

Fixed term contract

O

Administrative contract (Contrato administrativo de provimento)

O

Other (please specify)____________________________________

O

  1. 14. 

    Validity of your contract

Less than 1 year

O

Between 1 and 3 years

O

More than 3 years

O

  1. 15. 

    Are you with an exclusive regime?

Yes

O

No

O

  1. 16. 

    Working regime

Part-time

O

Full-time

O

Other (please specify)____________________________________

O

  1. 17. 

    How many hours do you usually teach per week:

At night (after 8 pm) ______

During the day ______

Saturday ______

  1. 18. 

    Besides the hours you teach during a week, how many hours do you work per week in average considering all aspects of education (orientation, lesson planning, assessment, monitoring of students…)? ______

  1. 19. 

    Is the work at night (teaching) rewarded at the primary institution where you teach?

Yes

O

No

O

I don’t know

O

  1. 20. 

    In which area/s do you teach?

General Programs

O

Education

O

Arts and Humanities

O

Social Sciences, Commerce and Law

O

Science, Mathematics and Computer

O

Engineering, Manufacturing Industries and Construction

O

Agriculture

O

Health and Social Protection

O

Services

O

Unspecified

O

  1. 21. 

    Is there correspondence between the area/s you teach and your area/s of academic education?

Yes

O

No

O

  1. 22.   

    Does your teaching activity cause stress to you?

Yes

O

No

O

  1. 23.   

    For how many years, including this year, are you teaching in higher education?

Less than 1 year

O

Please indicate the years: ______

 
  1. 24.   

    For how many years, including this year, are you teaching in your current institution ?

Less than 1 year

O

Please indicate the years: ______

 
  1. 25.   

    If you have the opportunity, will you move to another institution?

    Yes

    O

    No

    O

    1. 25.1. 

      If yes, why?

    Select all that apply

    I would like to have better working conditions (e. g. space, workload)

    O

    I would like to work in another geographical location

    O

    I would like to work in another type of institution (e.g. public, private)

    O

    I would like to work in another institution with better reputation

    O

    I would like to have research opportunities

    O

    I am not satisfied with my position

    O

    I am not satisfied with my salary

    O

    I am not satisfied with the quality of my students

    O

    Other (please specify) ______________________________________

    O

1.8.2 Teaching management

  1. 26.  

    Are you responsible for the management of any program?

    Yes

    O

    No

    O

    1. 26.1.

      If yes, what is/are the academic degree/s?

    Select all that apply

    Undergraduate

    O

    Master

    O

    PhD

    O

    Advanced Training Courses

    O

1.8.3 Management

  1. 27.

    What management positions have you been holding in the last five years?

Select all that apply

Coordinator/Director of Department

O

President/School Director

O

School Vice-President

O

School Vice-Director

O

Rector/President

O

Vice-Rector/Vice-President

O

Pro-Rector

O

I have not held management responsibilities

O

Other (please, specify)_________________

O

1.8.4 Research

  1. 28.

    Over the last five years have you been responsible for:

any research centre?

Yes

O

No

O

any funded research project?

Yes

O

No

O

any unfunded research project?

Yes

O

No

O

  1. 29. 

    If you have research tasks/responsibilities, what is the main scientific area in which you do research?

    Mathematics

    O

    Computer and information sciences

    O

    Physical sciences

    O

    Chemical sciences

    O

    Earth and related environmental sciences

    O

    Biological sciences

    O

    Other natural sciences

    O

    Civil engineering

    O

    Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

    O

    Mechanical engineering

    O

    Chemical engineering

    O

    Materials engineering

    O

    Medical engineering

    O

    Environmental engineering

    O

    Environmental biotechnology

    O

    Industrial Biotechnology

    O

    Nano-technology

    O

    Other engineering and Technologies

    O

    Basic medicine

    O

    Clinical medicine

    O

    Health sciences

    O

    Health biotechnology

    O

    Other medical sciences

    O

    Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries

    O

    Animal and dairy science

    O

    Veterinary science

    O

    Agricultural biotechnology

    O

    Other agricultural sciences

    O

    Psychology

    O

    Economics and business

    O

    Educational sciences

    O

    Sociology

    O

    Law

    O

    Political Science

    O

    Social and economic geography

    O

    Media and communications

    O

    Other social sciences

    O

    History and archaeology

    O

    Languages and literature

    O

    Philosophy, ethics and religion

    O

    Art (arts, history of arts, performing arts, music)

    O

    Other humanities

    O

    1. 29.1.

      On average, how many hours do you spend per week with that research activity?______

1.8.5 All Activities in Higher Education

  1. 30.

    Approximately, what percentage of time do you spend , during an academic year, in the following activities (including your national and international involvement)?

    In these fields only should be introduced numbers

    The total must be 100 points

Teaching activities (Including preparations, teaching, evaluation)

Academic and educational advising

Orientation of works/thesis/dissertations

Research

Committee work (national and/or international)

Administrative duties

Professional development

Consulting

Service to the academic community

Community Services

Other

Remaining:

Total:

  1. 31.

    Approximately, what percentage of time would you like to spend , during an academic year, in the following activities (including your national and international involvement)?

    • In these fields only should be introduced numbers

    • The total must be 100 points

Teaching activities (Including preparations, teaching, evaluation)

Academic and educational advising

Orientation of works/thesis/dissertations

Research

Committee work (national and/or international)

Administrative duties

Professional development

Consulting

Service to the academic community

Community Services

Other

Remaining:

Total:

  1. 32. 

    Please tell us the following:

Does your professional activity has an impact on your family life?

Positive Impact (Please describe)_____________________________________________

Negative Impact (Please describe)_____________________________________________

1.9 VII. General Information

  1. 33. 

    Sex

Female

O

Male

O

  1. 34.

    Marital status

Single

O

Married

O

Divorced

O

Widow/er

O

Separated

O

União de facto (living together for more than two years)

O

  1. 34.1.

    Does your partner/husband/wife work? (If you have partner/husband/wife)

    Yes

    O

    No

    O

    1. 34.2.

      Is your partner/husband/wife an academic? (If you have partner/husband/wife)

    Yes

    O

    No

    O

  1. 35.

    Year of birth ________

  1. 36.

    Type of institution

Public University

O

Public Polytechnic

O

Private University

O

Private Polytechnic

O

  1. 37.

    In which institution do you teach? (answers in attachment)

  2. 38.

    Approximately, what is your net salary per month? (The answer is optional) __________

  3. 39.

    Which of the following descriptions comes closest to your feeling about the current income of people living in your house?

The current income allows you to live comfortably

O

The current income is enough to live

O

It's difficult to live with the current income

O

It is very difficult to live with the current income

O

You don’t know

O

  1. 40. 

    What is your degree of education?

    Undergraduate

    O

    Master

    O

    PhD

    O

    Specify the area

    Mathematics

    O

    Computer and information sciences

    O

    Physical sciences

    O

    Chemical sciences

    O

    Earth and related environmental sciences

    O

    Biological sciences

    O

    Other natural sciences

    O

    Civil engineering

    O

    Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

    O

    Mechanical engineering

    O

    Chemical engineering

    O

    Materials engineering

    O

    Medical engineering

    O

    Environmental engineering

    O

    Environmental biotechnology

    O

    Industrial Biotechnology

    O

    Nano-technology

    O

    Other engineering and Technologies

    O

    Basic medicine

    O

    Clinical medicine

    O

    Health sciences

    O

    Health biotechnology

    O

    Other medical sciences

    O

    Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries

    O

    Animal and dairy science

    O

    Veterinary science

    O

    Agricultural biotechnology

    O

    Other agricultural sciences

    O

    Psychology

    O

    Economics and business

    O

    Educational sciences

    O

    Sociology

    O

    Law

    O

    Political Science

    O

    Social and economic geography

    O

    Media and communications

    O

    Other social sciences

    O

    History and archaeology

    O

    Languages and literature

    O

    Philosophy, ethics and religion

    O

    Art (arts, history of arts, performing arts, music)

    O

    Other humanities

    O

    • Specify the year of conclusion of your highest academic degree __________

      GENERAL COMMENTS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Machado-Taylor, M.d.L. et al. (2017). Academic Job Satisfaction and Motivation: Perspectives from a Nation-Wide Study in Public Higher Education Institutions in Portugal. In: Machado-Taylor, M., Soares, V., Teichler, U. (eds) Challenges and Options: The Academic Profession in Europe. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45844-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45844-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45843-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45844-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics